...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Ashland

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the traumatic implications of a dog bite injury, it’s crucial to choose a law team equipped with extensive experience and knowledge. Carlson Bier aptly fits this qualification for such significant legal matters in Illinois. Our firm is dedicated solely to personal injury cases, particularly those derived from dog bites. We fully understand how these incidents can cause physical pain, emotional trauma, and financial stress due to medical bills and lost wages if you’re unable to work post-incident. Therefore at Carlson Bier, we ardently fight for your rightful compensation related specifically to Dog Bite Injuries using our sophisticated understanding of animal laws in Illinois. Trust us with your case: we prioritize clients’ needs before everything else; working tirelessly around-the-clock until justice prevails on behalf of our valued client who has suffered due extraordinary circumstances beyond their control. With an impressive record that speaks volumes about our commitment and efficacy when handling these types of cases – underscored by numerous successful outcomes – Carlson Bier unequivocally reflects expertise second-to-none in dog bite injuries litigation within The Prairie State.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Ashland Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are specialized in providing sterling legal services in the wide field of personal injury law. When you find yourself facing a situation related to dog bite injuries, our practiced team based out of Illinois possesses both the knowledge and unparalleled experience to handle such sensitive matters with professionalism and care.

Dog bites can lead to severe physical injuries and emotional trauma. These can range from puncture wounds and lacerations to possible infections or diseases transmitted by dogs such as rabies or tetanus. In severe instances, this might also escalate to nerve damage or even disfigurement which could result in long term impact on your day-to-day activities. Standards for dog owners’ responsibility for their pets vary widely, but Illinois law holds dog owners strictly liable for any harm caused by their dog – an aspect that Carlson Bier champions meticulously in every case we handle.

• The state of Illinois is firm on its legislation holding dog owners accountable for their pet’s actions.

• Pertaining specifically to cases where a dog may have attacked without provocation

• This defines proof required for demonstrating negligence leading to injury

For each unique case we take under our belt at Carlson Bier, the guiding principle remains — advocating tirelessly till justice is served. Our deep understanding of the law helps us navigate through nuances between parties involved and sets us apart from most other law firms.

An inherent part of pursuing a just claim focuses not only on evident physical injury but also brings into spotlight psychological traumas linked with distressing incidents like a violent dog attack. Victims may suffer anxiety, sleep disturbances or even post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) which often go unnoticed while assessing overall damages.

• Above all visible physical injuries there can be unseen psychological impacts.

• It’s crucial these get considered when claiming compensation

• Delayed suffering such as fear towards dogs affecting daily life may develop

Navigating necessary legal processes during these taxing times should not be an added burden fretting you. To alleviate your concerns, Carlson Bier concentrates its expertise to fight for maximum possible compensation, thereby letting you focus on your recovery process.

Once retained as your legal counsel, we efficiently manage all aspects related to the claim – starting from in-depth investigation of the incident that caused the injuries, thorough analysis of applicable laws and flawless execution of the entire litigation process. We leave no stone unturned while gathering potential evidence which boost strength to your case including taking detailed statements from relevant witnesses and meticulous collection of medical records that substantiate claims made.

• Entire dog bite incident probed meticulously.

• Medical documents gathered serving as strong evidentiary tools

• Comprehensive witness testimony aiding towards building a concrete case

Being involved in a traumatic situation like a dog bite injury can be physically daunting and emotionally taxing. At Carlson Bier, our skilled team extends beyond fighting for fair compensation limits; we provide compassionate guidance throughout the journey ranging from understanding complex legalese associated with rightful justice, professional representation at trials or detailed consultation sessions disseminating impactful strategies personalized for each client.

In entrusting us with guarding your rights during this challenging phase, rest assured knowing every intricate detail will be handled by an experienced personal injury attorney unyieldingly dedicated to championing your cause.

Understandably, seeking justice and claiming rightfully due compensations are highly individual processes differing based on unique experiences tied with each incident. To elucidate more about how much possibly could be claimed under Illinois law pertaining specifically to dog bite incidents, we recommend clicking on the button below. Not only can this help you comprehend monetary worth against sustained injuries but also let delve deeper into intricacies involved within this realm of personal injury law.

At Carlson Bier – where integrity meets action; Your justice wouldn’t merely remain fought for; it would indeed await being served!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Ashland Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Ashland

Areas of Practice in Ashland

Cycling Accidents

Expert in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or perilous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Supplying professional legal help for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Hospital Carelessness

Providing dedicated legal services for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Fault

Managing cases involving problematic products, extending adept legal guidance to clients affected by defective items.

Geriatric Abuse

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Slip Occurrences

Expert in handling trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking recovery for their losses.

Infant Damages

Extending legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Collisions

Incidents: Devoted to helping clients of car accidents secure reasonable remuneration for damages and losses.

Scooter Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

18-Wheeler Crash

Ensuring specialist legal assistance for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for harms.

Construction Incidents

Engaged in defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Neurological Impairments

Expert in extending compassionate legal advice for victims suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Injuries

Adept at dealing with cases for persons who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Expert in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Wrongful Loss

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and experienced legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Backbone Impairment

Focused on representing individuals with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal support to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer