...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Ashland

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When suffering from the aftermath of a slip and fall accident in Ashland, securing reliable legal representation can make all the difference. Trust Carlson Bier to champion your case with dedication and expertise. Our deep-rooted knowledge in handling personal injury claims, specifically pertaining to slip and fall accidents, position us at the forefront of this specialized field of law. We understand that such incidents can bring unanticipated hardships, both physical and financial. That’s why Carlson Bier takes comprehensive actions to ensure victims receive fair compensation for their predicaments including medical expenses, lost wages or earning capacity as well as pain & suffering caused by negligence or unsafe conditions leading to their mishap. Leveraging our robust legal acumen would seamlessly navigate you through complexities associated with Illinois injury laws while upholding your best interest against insurance companies aiming for minimal payouts. Choose excellence tailored uniquely towards your situation; choose Carlson Bier – dedicated advocates renowned for dealing meticulously in Slip And Fall Accidents.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Ashland Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, a prominent Personal Injury Attorney Group based in Illinois. We specialize in a diverse range of personal injury cases, with a particular expertise in handling slip and fall accidents. These dangerous incidents tend to be far more common than one might think, and the legal complexities surrounding them can often be daunting for victims pursuing compensation.

It’s crucial to understand that slip and fall cases fall under the broader category of ‘premises liability’cases—this means that property owners may be held legally responsible when someone gets injured due to unsafe conditions on their property. The responsibility is not absolute; it varies depending on specific circumstances including location of the accident and whether the victim had any reason to be on the premises.

To establish fault in your case, it’s essential to demonstrate that:

• The property owner/renter was aware or should have been aware about the risk but failed to address or warn others about it.

• The owner/renter caused the perilous condition leading up to harm.

• The negligence of owner/renter was directly related to your misfortune.

Navigating through such claims involves complex legal principles, requiring an experienced attorney like those found at Carlson Bier. We are adept at substantiating these intricate details required for successful outcomes in personal injury cases involving slips and falls.

You’re also entitled by law for potential compensations which could include:

• Medical expenses: covering hospital bills, prescriptions medicines etc.

• Rehabilitation costs: occupational therapy or rehabilitation equipment required post-accidents

• Inability-to-work compensation: losses incurred due lack of ability to perform professional work during recovery

A logical question after reading this would undoubtedly be ‘How much could my case potentially be worth?’ Establishing monetary value associated with your personal injury claim is not a straight-forward process—it largely depends upon specifics tied closely with individual circumstances surrounding your injuries and other impact factors involved. This conversion from experience to numbers involves careful analysis of past, present and future expenses, an evaluation process where our attorneys excel.

At Carlson Bier, we believe that every victim deserves proficient and compassionate representation in their pursuit of justice. Our team comprised of meticulous professionals with comprehensive knowledge about the Illinois law, works relentlessly around the clock for presenting you a rock-solid case on your behalf. We are committed towards ensuring each client feels heard, valued and reassured throughout this emotionally turbulent phase post injuries.

Lastly, bear in mind no two slip-and-falls are identical; hence deriving a firm number off an enterprising guess is not what we offer—we pride ourselves about providing individualized attention devoted to detail-oriented case presentation aiming for maximum recoveries. However do feel free to try clicking on the button below which can give an approximate estimation—providing preliminary ground-work serving as cornerstones for building actionable strategies down our legal highway together!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Ashland Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Ashland

Areas of Practice in Ashland

Bike Mishaps

Proficient in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or perilous conditions.

Flame Damages

Giving expert legal advice for people of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Healthcare Misconduct

Providing dedicated legal services for patients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Obligation

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, providing adept legal services to victims affected by defective items.

Aged Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Stumble Incidents

Expert in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking justice for their suffering.

Newborn Damages

Supplying legal aid for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Crashes

Incidents: Devoted to assisting sufferers of car accidents get equitable remuneration for harms and harm.

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Big Rig Crash

Offering professional legal support for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for harms.

Worksite Mishaps

Committed to advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Head Harms

Focused on providing specialized legal assistance for persons suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Traumas

Specialized in dealing with cases for people who have suffered damages from dog bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Specializing in legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unjust Passing

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and skilled legal representation to ensure redress.

Vertebral Impairment

Specializing in supporting persons with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​