FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Ashley

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Carlson Bier – a premier Illinois legal institution, is revered for its expertise in handling Dog Bite Injury cases. Leveraging their advanced experience with such concerns, they’ve developed an unparalleled reputation that extends even to the residents of Ashley. As dog attack victims are faced with unique challenges and often incapacitating injuries, having Carlson Bier as your entrusted representative ensures dedicated counsel focused on obtaining maximum benefits for you. They thoroughly investigate each case in order to achieve just compensation from those liable and are astute at maneuvering through the complex web of personal injury law specific to dog attacks. What defines their service is an empathetic approach combined with relentless pursuit against any defendant negligent enough to downplay injuries caused by dogs under their care or control – no matter who they may be: neighbor, friend or stranger near Ashley city limits.. For outstanding representation concerning Dog Bite Injuries, entrust Carlson Bier — where justice is not merely pursued but achieved!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Ashley Illinois

When you or your loved one falls victim to a dog bite injury, the ramifications can be physically, emotionally, and financially devastating. Carlson Bier is committed to providing world-class legal counsel and support for individuals residing in Illinois suffering from such injuries. Our expertise covers a wide spectrum of personal injury cases with particular emphasis on dog bite injuries, an often overlooked area of personal injury law.

Dog bites can lead to severe physical injuries including deep tissue damage, fractures, permanent scarring or disfigurement. Medical treatment can incur substantial costs and recovery periods may result in loss of income. Additionally, the psychological impact – trauma and anxiety – should not be understated. Despite these factors, victims often hesitate to seek compensation through legal avenues due to lack of awareness or fear of lengthy litigation processes.

The attorneys at Carlson Bier are certified experts in unraveling complex personal injury laws pertaining specifically to dog bite injuries in Illinois. They leverage their expansive knowledge base and experience to ensure that victims are justly compensated for their suffering.

• Dog owner liability: In most scenarios involving dog bites, owners will be held accountable for their pets’ behavior irrespective of prior aggressiveness.

• Exceptions include instances where a victim was trespassing or had provoked the animal into attacking.

• Statutes Of Limitations: The timeframe within which a lawsuit must be filed after an incident is strictly regulated by law; typically within two years in Illinois.

• Level Of Damages: Damages awarded vary greatly depending on specific details such as severity of physical harm and psychological distress incurred by the victim.

Negotiating settlements with insurance companies can be overwhelming without skilled legal representation and victims may end up receiving significantly lower compensation than they rightly deserve. The lawyers at Carlson Bier specialize in handling each case individually – calculating medical expenses past and future pain suffering monetary losses traumatic scars inability work amongst many other variables – ensuring all elements the claims thoroughly examined negotiated.

Furthermore being involved with community outreach programs Carlson Bier believes in educating the general public about dog bite laws. Indeed understanding these can exponentially increase prospects of successful compensation claims while fostering safer environments for people and pets alike.

With a solid track record, Carlson Bier has built a credible reputation in representing Illinois residents and is well equipped to provide the compassionate care and aggressive representation needed during such challenging times. Their philosophy revolves around minimizing stress faced by clients during litigation processes enabling them to focus on recovery instead.

By navigating complex legalities, dealing assertively with insurance companies, upholding good communication throughout proceedings, ensuring rightful compensation— all are key deliverables promised by our team at Carlson Bier. When you choose us as your allies in battle against unequipped scenarios like dog bites make sure equip yourself with zealous legal representation committed achieving nothing but best outcome possible.

We invite you to utilise our resources stand not just personal injury victim – but empowered individual ready take head-on fight justice rightfully deserved. Don’t let negligence others pinch moral financial solace life’s unfair surprises steal away peace mind stability deserve remember it’s mere mouse-click away!

At this juncture it’s natural feel overwhelmed uncertain future especially concerning potential burden long-drawn process pursuing litigation alone. That’s where Carlson Bier steps towards being guiding hand empathetic companion through harrowing journey restoring normalcy lives bitten bruised random act animal aggression.

In clicking the button below, we offer an insight into your case value before any formal commitment or payment on your part. Let us be worthy allies in this tough time; let us bring valued expertise to our table with sincerity, tenacity and a steely resolve that your rights will be upheld – no matter what lies ahead!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Ashley Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Ashley

Areas of Practice in Ashley

Bicycle Collisions

Expert in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Flame Traumas

Supplying adept legal help for victims of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Clinical Carelessness

Providing expert legal assistance for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Liability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, offering specialist legal support to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Misconduct

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Stumble Accidents

Professional in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking recovery for their injuries.

Birth Harms

Supplying legal guidance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Crashes: Dedicated to aiding patients of car accidents secure reasonable remuneration for wounds and destruction.

Scooter Accidents

Focused on providing legal advice for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

18-Wheeler Crash

Extending experienced legal support for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for losses.

Construction Site Collisions

Focused on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Brain Injuries

Dedicated to ensuring compassionate legal assistance for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Injuries

Adept at dealing with cases for persons who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Expert in legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unjust Passing

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and experienced legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Focused on supporting persons with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​