...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Ashton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with dog bite injuries in Ashton, count on the legal expertise of Carlson Bier. Our law firm excels in personal injury cases, particularly focusing on dog bite incidents. Our seasoned attorneys understand the trauma and physical impact suffered by victims post a canine attack. The severity magnifies when it pertains to children or seniors and we stand committed to fighting for their justice competently.

At Carlson Bier, we attribute our success to an intimate understanding of Illinois laws surrounding pet ownership liabilities. We diligently assist clients navigate through this complex web ensuring they receive deserved compensation per Illinois regulations.

Our strategies encapsulate objective evidence presentation including medical records testimony from eyewitnesses if need be. Combining years of experience with specialist knowledge ensures effective representation optimizing your chances at successful restitution.

Choosing Carlson Bier means electing undeterred advocacy that ardently champions your interests from beginning till end regardless of opposition strength – insurance companies or owners reluctant accepting accountability.

We aren’t just lawyers; we’re authorities in this niche battlefield where negotiation meets indisputable fact-finding tactics! Garnering victories across diverse scenarios has strongly cemented our view: defending Dog Bite Injury Victims is not only necessary but humane too!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Ashton Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the trauma of being a victim of an unprovoked Dog Bite Injury. As Illinois-based personal injury attorneys specializing in this field, we are dedicated to offering our comprehensive legal services and helping you navigate through these complex legal matters.

Dog bites can result in an array of severe wounds ranging from physical scarring to psychological damage; it’s not just about dealing with the immediate pain and suffering, but often also managing long-term impact on emotional health, work capability, and overall quality of life. Unaware dog owners, negligent management by animal care facilities or public spaces failure to ensure safety regulations can all potentially contribute toward such unfortunate incidents.

Let’s delve into some key factors involved:

• Dog owner responsibility: In Illinois, dog owners are held legally responsible if their dog causes injuries to another person without misconduct on the part of the victim or provocation towards the dog.

• Timeframe for filing a claim: The statute of limitations stipulates that a lawsuit has to be filed within two years from the date of the incident.

• Understanding damages: Damages for a dog bite injury may encompass medical costs incurred for treatment now and for any future complications resulting from the injury. It includes lost wages during recovery time too. Pain and suffering is another significant factor where compensation might be awarded by courts taking into account both physical pain/discomfort as well as mental distress.

In fact choosing us as your representation assures you access not only to vigorous advocacy aiming at winning you rightful compensation but also compassionate guidance throughout your journey from consultation stage right up until successful resolution of your case. Our confidence comes from our seasoned experience handling diverse personal injury cases including those pertaining specifically to canine-related injuries. We strongly believe in continuous learning process which aids us dynamically adapt our strategy based on each unique case narrative thereby ensuring most favorable outcomes for our clients available under appropriate state laws.

So let’s examine exactly how we bring value-addition when on your side:

• Vast industry knowledge plus connections with critical resources such as medical professionals attesting injuries, dog bite injury specialists for providing authentic evidence.

• Dedicated case preparation goes into gathering and analyzing facts, preparing a methodical timeline of the events to present your situation in most reliable light before jury or during settlement negotiations.

• Our aim is not just limited to win compensation but also maintain transparency about legal steps involved enabling you to make informed decisions at every stage.

At Carlson Bier, protecting clients’ rights and safety are our foremost commitment. We understand that managing post-injury stress can indeed be overwhelming hence not having financial burden compound that hardship is what we strive for. Allow us to build a solid defense case maximizing your chances of substantial monetary reparation.

Our pledge remains consistent – If we don’t win, you owe us nothing! Hence you may rest assured knowing there’s no risk when you decide to let us fight on your behalf.

Being victims and suffering traumatic experience isn’t easy but remember help is available; don’t feel alone in this journey! Stand up for justice by clicking on the button below and finding out what compensation could be secured for your ordeal – because you truly deserve it!

Law should serve as an avenue for healing and hope rather than intimidation which Carlson Bier aims at making certain with our personalized approach towards each client’s unique circumstance. Click below now… review how much value lies within your claim… because genuine professional representation costs only if results are won!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Ashton Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Ashton

Areas of Practice in Ashton

Bike Mishaps

Expert in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Flame Injuries

Providing adept legal help for victims of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Medical Malpractice

Providing dedicated legal advice for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Fault

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, offering skilled legal help to customers affected by faulty goods.

Elder Malpractice

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Slip Injuries

Adept in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking compensation for their suffering.

Newborn Damages

Offering legal help for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Accidents: Devoted to assisting patients of car accidents get equitable payout for wounds and losses.

Motorbike Incidents

Expert in providing legal services for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Trucking Accident

Ensuring expert legal advice for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for harms.

Building Site Incidents

Committed to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Cerebral Harms

Specializing in offering dedicated legal representation for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Harms

Adept at addressing cases for victims who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Demise

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and skilled legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spine Damage

Focused on assisting individuals with paralysis, offering professional legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​