FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Assumption

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing and recovering from a pedestrian accident in Assumption, Illinois can be harrowing. In such distressing times, Carlson Bier – your unparalleled partner for personal injury legal cases is just a call away. Our extensive competence in handling pedestrian accidents sets us apart. We’re dedicated to serving our clients with unwavering commitment that goes beyond courtrooms—our job begins the moment an unfortunate event like this happens to you or someone you love.

Carlson Bier’s reputable team of dependable attorneys excels at navigating complex litigation tied with pedestrian law scenarios. While we diligently safeguard your rights, we advocate vehemently for maximum compensation corresponding to damages incurred during the incident.

Trust us as your defenders because every case presents unique circumstances and challenges that are only truly understood through experience and understanding: something our firm prides itself on based on years of success stories. Contact Carlson Bier today: champions when it comes to litigating difficult cases related to pedestrian accidents, and trusted partners who value justice above all else!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Assumption Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we’re deeply committed to providing you with comprehensive and empathetic support in the wake of a pedestrian accident. Based in Illinois, our team of personal injury attorneys possess extensive experience and expertise in handling cases specific to these unfortunate circumstances. Pedestrian accidents are all too common and often result in severe injuries due to the vulnerability of pedestrians amidst heavy motorized traffic.

Your understanding of your rights as a pedestrian is crucial for your claim. By law, drivers have a duty of care towards pedestrians; however, many pedestrian accidents occur due to driver error or negligence such as distracted driving and failure to yield at crosswalks. You may be entitled to compensation if you have been injured due to negligent actions by any party.

Moreover, detailed knowledge about insurance companies can not only help alleviate immediate financial stress but aid in securing adequate long-term coverage for medical treatment and potential loss of earnings linked directly to the incident:

• First-party claims: Your own insurance can cover certain expenses irrespective of fault.

• Third-party claims: Utilize the policy belonging to the person at fault.

In both situations, partnering with a personal injury attorney proves invaluable — negotiating skillfully with insurers could ensure that damages covered include not only immediate costs (such as those relative for hospitalization), but considerations extending beyond initial recovery periods.

Furthermore, proving liability incurs careful groundwork from compiling documents (medical reports) through meticulous inquiries into eye-witness accounts — an unmistakable umbrella protecting your interests against unlikely complications in court proceedings. Our professional team lends itself wholly towards this exhaustive process driven singularly by pursuing justice on behalf of victims unfairly thrust into despair—a promise echoing our unwavering ethos dedicated across Illinois communities.

Understanding complexities surrounding relevant laws is pivotal when navigating pedestrian accident disputes:

• Comparative negligence: Injured parties must prove that they bear less than 50% responsibility for their injuries.

• Duty & breach: Demonstrate how another party’s conduct fell short of expected norms.

• Cause & damages: The faulty party’s actions caused harm, and the damage you suffered is a direct result of these actions.

Guiding you through this labyrinth with unwavering patience and understanding encapsulates our dedicated approach towards cementing justified outcomes. Our team stands unyieldingly alongside victims at every uphill climb through judicial proceedings while aligning ourselves with local laws — an integral segment indisputably dictating success in personal injury claims.

Our pledge to you as a distinguished Illinois based Personal Injury Attorneys extends beyond mere representation. Knowledge, aim to empower by transforming complex legal language into relatable insights capturing the essence about pedestrian accidents. We place immense emphasis on education, firmly believing that informed clients are best positioned to make crucial decisions impacting their lives long-term.

Experience steers us unequivocally towards rehabilitation—restoring dignity often lost amidst episodes triggering personal mishaps—an aspiration voiced wholeheartedly across our practice focusing profoundly on each client’s unique experience, individual expectations leveling grounds for richer two-way dialogue assuring seamless transactions dispelling any potential misunderstandings during case progression.

Carlson Bier nestles completely within life-altering consequences borne by victims seeking justice post pedestrian accidents—a commitment reflecting dominant ethos ingrained deeply alongside providing top notch services—valuing robust partnerships transcending beyond monetary compensation weaving humanistic threads seamlessly aligning with your journey towards recuperation founded upon firm resolves infused around tireless dedication pledged tirelessly in securing warranted justice promised for you, for all Illinois residents approaching uncertain turmoil inherent when entering courts’ arduous demands.

Ultimately though it’s impossible to undo adversity confronted by pedestrians post-accidents, Carlson Bier actively help flip pages moving from debilitating pasts gradually stepping onto hopeful tomorrows—not merely restoring old realities but advocating brighter futures unscarred by unforeseen incidents furiously disrupting harmony.

You do not have to face such demanding circumstances alone. Allow our unparalleled expertise guide your path through these challenging times. We invite you to explore further using our unique case estimation feature available at the click of the button below. Discover how much your case might be worth and begin this important conversation today with Carlson Bier, where you are our greatest priority.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Assumption Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Assumption

Areas of Practice in Assumption

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Expert in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or unsafe conditions.

Fire Injuries

Extending professional legal advice for people of major burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Medical Misconduct

Ensuring experienced legal services for patients affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Fault

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, extending skilled legal assistance to customers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Neglect

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Trip Accidents

Specialist in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking compensation for their injuries.

Neonatal Damages

Providing legal assistance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Incidents

Accidents: Committed to guiding victims of car accidents get just payout for injuries and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Specializing in providing representation for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Semi Crash

Delivering expert legal assistance for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for harms.

Construction Collisions

Dedicated to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Cerebral Impairments

Expert in ensuring compassionate legal services for victims suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Expertise in handling cases for victims who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Dedicated to legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unjust Passing

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and adept legal representation to ensure justice.

Neural Injury

Expert in assisting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​