Medical Malpractice Attorney in Astoria

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking justice following a medical malpractice incident, your choice of attorney truly matters. Choose Carlson Bier — highly skilled practitioners in the complex field of Medical Malpractice Law with an unwavering dedication to upholding their clients’ rights. With their base rooted in Illinois law, this exceptional law firm brings unparalleled knowledge and experience to every case they handle. In amending wrongs inflicted by negligent healthcare providers, these determined attorneys can make it right again for the individuals affected— residents within Astoria included. They meticulously analyze each aspect of your case, ensuring not a single detail is overlooked during discussions or courtroom proceedings alike.. Choosing Carlson Bier signifies giving power to fearless advocacy backed by thorough research techniques that unquestionably favor you on any medical misdiagnosis or negligence cases— helping you piece together what’s been lost after such devastating instances without involving unnecessary stressors including locale specifics associated with common practices within legal professional advertising boundaries.

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Astoria Illinois

The Carlson Bier Law Group, a premier personal injury legal team based in Illinois, is your trusted partner when it comes to tackling cases involving medical malpractice. Making sense of such situations can be complex and challenging, even under the best circumstances. That’s why we’re here: to provide expert guidance and support as you navigate these tricky legal waters.

Medical malpractice occurs when a patient experiences harm or injury due to substandard treatment received from their healthcare provider. It becomes pivotal for you being the patient, or family members on behalf of patients, to understand what precipitates medical malpractice claims:

– Negligence: This is essentially care that falls below accepted standards.

– Injury caused by negligence: A claim for medical malpractice isn’t valid without clear proof that the negligence resulted in substantial harm or injury.

– Damages due to Injury: The patient must show definitive proof of harm brought about by negligence.

Awareness about these key baselines helps in building a strong case against medical malpractice. In-depth comprehension often requires professional insight which gets precisely provided through our committed services at Carlson Bier.

In traversing the complexities of Medical Malpractice Lawsuits in Illinois, it aids tremendously having dependable advocates like us on board. There are time restrictions applicable – known as Statutes of Limitation – within which claims need filing after identifying an injury or wrongful death resultant from such negligent acts. Navigating this timeline successfully is essential for achieving rightful justice.

Additionally, understanding Caps on Damages too carry hefty significance for clients pursuing lawsuits concerning medical misconducts; lamentably several individuals remain oblivious about these crucial norms until they end up losing significantly in compensation owing to insufficient awareness.

No two cases share identical details; however with astute preparation plus thoughtful handling optimal outcomes may still get achieved despite numerous intricate variables tying into each lawsuit related to medical Fallacy Cases have significantly focused light upon areas ignored way too long within healthcare industry—all contributing towards better protection for patients upon whom such maintain justice shouldn’t stay confined to diction alone; rather it ought be ensconced in every individual’s right of access to fair and quality healthcare, a mandate having been long due.

Our skilled attorneys at Carlson Bier bring to you decades of legal expertise well-versed with the intricacies involved within medical malpractice claims. Alongside skillful handling of your respective lawsuits, there also rests our staunch commitment to stand by your side all through this journey ahead filled with legal challenges and hurdles. While we cannot guarantee any particular outcome, rest assured knowing that our seasoned team will put their best foot forward in pursuit of favorable results for you.

Importantly each maneuver executed during the lawsuit maintains strict compliance with existing Illinois laws—including rigorous respect regarding prohibitions against false advertisements about office locations—a blatant testament to our unwavering belief in upholding stringent ethical standards while providing superior client services reflecting honesty, transparency, dedication and unquestionable proficiency.

With everything stated hereinabove, it’s time we incorporate action into words—start off by understanding what worth does your case holds—the next step marking commencement of this path leading towards seeking rightful justice from erring medical personnel. Encourage yourself to take that first bold cognitive leap as numerous others did before you… Click on the button below…reveal how much your case is actually worth—it may pleasantly surprise you! We’re here waiting for you at Carlson Bier Law Group—inching closer toward shared dreams transforming today’s reality steeped in ethical frameworks casting long-term impacts benefiting clients like you who repose trust unto us.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Astoria Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Astoria

Areas of Practice in Astoria

Bike Incidents

Focused on legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Giving specialist legal help for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Medical Negligence

Delivering specialist legal services for clients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Fault

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, providing specialist legal support to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Elder Malpractice

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Slip Incidents

Specialist in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking recovery for their harm.

Birth Harms

Offering legal guidance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Collisions

Collisions: Devoted to aiding individuals of car accidents get reasonable recompense for harms and impairment.

Motorcycle Incidents

Dedicated to providing representation for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Semi Collision

Offering experienced legal assistance for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for losses.

Building Site Incidents

Engaged in defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Brain Impairments

Focused on providing compassionate legal advice for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Damages

Skilled in tackling cases for clients who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Specializing in legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Death

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and adept legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Backbone Harm

Committed to representing individuals with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal representation to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer