FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Astoria

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating life after a Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) can be an emotional, physical, and financial challenge. You need an experienced attorney who understands the complexity of these cases. Carlson Bier is your best choice when it comes to selecting legal representation for spinal cord injuries in Astoria. Our team includes skilled professionals who have dealt magnificently with SCI disputes all over Illinois, earning us respect and trust among communities we serve.

Why choose Carlson Bier? Our expertise has repeatedly proven invaluable throughout the complexities of SCI lawsuits — winning substantial settlements or trial awards for our clients. We understand the intricate medical aspects of SCIs, which enables us to present compelling claims on behalf of our clients.

Our commitment goes beyond winning: through every aspect of your case – from consultations to courtroom representation – we ensure you are treated with utmost care and dignity that you deserve. Trust your case only to Carlson Bier – a law firm well-versed in advocating for individuals impacted by spinal cord injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Astoria Illinois

As distinguished personal injury attorneys, our commitment at Carlson Bier is driven not merely by legal finesse but also with a deep sense of empathy for those who have suffered serious injuries. We are located across Illinois and specialize in various domains of personal injury law such as car accidents, workplace injuries, medical negligence, and wrongful death.

Spinal cord injuries—the domain that we will explore today—are among the most challenging hardships someone may face due to their far-reaching impact on all aspects of life. It is a complex area within the umbrella of personal injury cases due to both its medical intricacies as well as detailed application under Illinois law. Understanding spinal cord injuries can be confusing and frightening, yet this understanding is crucial for victims seeking rightful compensation.

A spinal cord injury occurs when there is damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves at the end of the spinal canal (cauda equina). The severity varies from temporary numbness or paralysis to complete immobility. Precise diagnosis requires expert analytical prowess from healthcare professionals alongside meticulous attention to detail and understanding from your chosen attorney. Key factors contributing to Spinal Cord Injuries include:

• High-impact collisions during vehicular accidents

• Falls, particularly in workplaces or construction sites

• Sports accidents involving high velocity impacts

• Violent incidents resulting in puncture wounds

• Medical negligence leading to surgical errors

Although couldn’t reverse these catastrophes’ physical damage entirely till now with modern medicine’s development pace—we aim to ensure relief for victims by helping them secure substantial financial compensation following their traumatic ordeal. As intense advocates for your right, we navigate through complex proceedings leveraging extensive knowledge of laws around spinal cord damages within Illinois jurisdiction.

Furthermore, while calculating claims linked with spinal cord injuries—multi-faceted aspects like ongoing costs associated with treatment or rehabilitation procedures; loss-of-income due unsafe work conditions; mental anguish inflicted by drastic lifestyle changes due physical independence limitation must taken into account—an attorney firm’s expertise undoubtedly becomes crucial. We at Carlson Bier are well versed with intricate laws surrounding these matters and ensure each case is pursued with relentless determination bearing an empathy-infused perspective.

In the aftermath of spinal cord injuries, complete understanding of your rights and legal recourse can be a beacon of hope amid uncertainty. Having a qualified team behind you—one like that of Carlson Bier—brings assurance that your needs will not only be comprehended but also fervently advocated for.

Partnering with experienced legal counsel should look beyond mere transactional requirement—it ought to involve trustworthy advisors diligently working towards getting rightful settlement for life-altering events victims have undeservedly experienced. This philosophy is practice in our law firm day-after-day—every client’s individual story deeply resonating within us propelling fight for justice relentlessly tooth-and-nail.

Thank you taking precious time learning about Spinal Cord Injuries how adept personal injury attorneys like us could help navigate through complex recovery process proving guiding light during toughest times. To get stark estimation around possible compensation figures-your injury deserves—a specially designed tool awaits below just click away ready reveal potentially life-changing possibilities. Empower yourself armed by knowledge don’t let circumstances overpower intrinsic resilience strength humans have—we’re here to provide expert advisement when needed most ensuring right always triumphs over rough trial tribulation rigged against innocent victims.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Astoria Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Astoria

Areas of Practice in Astoria

Bike Incidents

Focused on legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Flame Burns

Giving professional legal help for patients of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Clinical Malpractice

Extending expert legal representation for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Accountability

Handling cases involving dangerous products, delivering professional legal help to consumers affected by defective items.

Geriatric Neglect

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Trip Occurrences

Skilled in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking justice for their harm.

Newborn Damages

Supplying legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Incidents

Mishaps: Committed to helping victims of car accidents obtain reasonable payout for hurts and damages.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Committed to providing legal assistance for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Big Rig Crash

Ensuring experienced legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for losses.

Construction Collisions

Concentrated on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Head Harms

Focused on ensuring dedicated legal support for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Injuries

Specialized in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog bites or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Crashes

Dedicated to legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Wrongful Passing

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and skilled legal support to ensure fairness.

Neural Damage

Expert in supporting individuals with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​