FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Atkinson

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re seeking legal assistance for dog bite injuries in the Atkinson vicinity, look no further than Carlson Bier. As a premier personal injury law firm of distinction, Carlson Bier is renowned for specializing in dog bite incidents. With meticulous attention to details and an unrelenting pursuit of justice, they stand alongside victims propelling them towards resolution and rightful compensation. Their unparalleled expertise ensures the intricate complexities surrounding every case are efficiently handled, providing clients with much-deserved peace during such challenging times. Using evidence-based strategies coupled with their comprehensive knowledge of Illinois laws pertaining to animal attacks provides their clients an upper hand when seeking recompense for medical bills, emotional trauma or loss of earnings due to incapacitation. Navigating this daunting landscape alone can be overwhelming; Carlson Bier eases these burdens by providing personalized guidance throughout each stage – from initial consultation all through litigation if necessary. Trust the illustrious reputation we’ve built over the years – put your journey towards justice into our capable hands at Carlson Bier today!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Atkinson Illinois

Understanding the gravity and consequences of Dog Bite Injuries is paramount, especially in Illinois. At Carlson Bier, we bring deep expertise and keen insight into this niche area of personal injury law. Representing victims of dog bites isn’t just our profession; it’s our commitment to ensuring that justice is served accurately.

Dog bite incidents are often overlooked or misunderstood due to lack of awareness about the severe physical and emotional harm they can cause. From minor discomfort and fear to major injuries necessitating medical intervention, these events should never be trivialized or neglected. The state law recognizes this, providing several avenues for compensation to dog bite victims within specific regulations.

Firstly, under the Illinois Animal Control Act, liability lies firmly with the pet owner, regardless if there were no previous signs of aggressive behavior displayed by their pet before biting a person without provocation on public property or while lawfully on private property.

Secondly, when a victim files a lawsuit based on “strict liability,” they do not need to prove negligence or fault on part of the dog owner. They only need to validate that they were attacked by the dog causing an injury while at a lawful place conducting themselves peaceably – except in cases where the person bit was committing trespassing or tormenting the animal illegally leading up to incident.

Lastly, besides strict liability claims against owners’ dogs who have bitten people unprovokedly might also be liable for claiming damages under common-law theory which includes proving negligent control over their pets resulting in any serious personal injuries caused thereof such as fractures wounds requiring stitches disfigurement psychological trauma among other possible complications associated with each unique case incident.

Beyond outlining your viable legal options accurately interpreting applicable laws representing you effectively during trial phases through mastery negotiation skills securing most expert testimonies examining extensive medical records fully understanding all contributing factors involved tackling potential defenses raised by opposing counsel etc., Carlson Bier passionately navigate complexities inherent within these specific areas bringing immense value towards working tirelessly towards securing maximum possible compensation.

Our highly skilled and experienced attorneys work diligently to keep victims informed and alleviate their stress during these proceedings, ensuring a smooth journey towards justice.

As a leading personal injury law firm in Illinois, Carlson Bier continues its mission to uphold the rights of dog bite victims. We want every client that walks through our doors to leave with peace knowing they have taken crucial steps forward in seeking deserved compensation for the undue harm caused by dog bites.

No amount can truly compensate for the pain endured from a Dog Bite Injury, however, fair legal recourse can certainly alleviate some heavy burdens linked inherently to such incidents.

Knowing how much your case could be worth is vital within this process. It has inherent emancipatory value – uplifting you from unsettling uncertainty into newfound knowledge wherein affirmative action takes precedence over daunting ambiguity any day!

Now, dare to take that next step forward with us – click on the button below and get an evaluation done today about what your case could fetch in terms of deserving compensation! Here’s not just looking at all legal options but choosing ones resonating most strongly with confidence-assured direction seasoned expertise powerful representations exclusively catering holistically around YOUR needs because YOU matter!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Atkinson Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Atkinson

Areas of Practice in Atkinson

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Flame Damages

Extending adept legal services for people of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Medical Carelessness

Providing dedicated legal representation for clients affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Accountability

Handling cases involving problematic products, extending adept legal assistance to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Trip Occurrences

Specialist in managing trip accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking recovery for their losses.

Childbirth Wounds

Offering legal support for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Incidents

Incidents: Devoted to guiding individuals of car accidents get just payout for damages and losses.

Motorbike Accidents

Expert in providing legal support for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Big Rig Incident

Ensuring experienced legal representation for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for injuries.

Building Crashes

Committed to advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Neurological Traumas

Committed to extending professional legal services for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Harms

Proficient in addressing cases for victims who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Committed to legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Loss

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and adept legal support to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Damage

Expert in defending clients with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal services to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440