FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Auburn Gresham

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with the complexities of dog bite injuries, securing top-tier legal representation should be your first concern. Entrust Carlson Bier – we specialize in excelling where others fall short. Our diligent team comprehends the intricacies of Illinois’ rigorous legal landscape and is committed to vigorously fight for your rights. We strive tirelessly for residents of Auburn Gresham faced with dog bite incidents, meticulously preparing each case as if it were proceeding to court. Given our burgeoning reputation and stringently ethical approach, clients across Auburn Gresham persistently attest to our dedication and proficiency in handling such sensitive matters. Be assured; when you choose Carlson Bier as your counsel, you’re backed by seasoned legal experts who possess proven results in procuring justifiable compensation for their clientele affected by dog bites – invaluable peace-of-mind during challenging times. Engage us without worry or delay–We endeavor not only to meet expectations but transcend them because at Carlson Bier – excellence isn’t a goal; it’s the standard.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Auburn Gresham Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in representing personal injury cases and are committed to defending the rights of those who have fallen victim to dog bite injuries. We understand that being involved in such an incident can be traumatic, often leaving physical and mental scars. As a trusted Illinois-based law firm with highly skilled attorneys, we strive to ensure you receive the fair compensation you deserve.

Dog bites can result in significant harm ranging from minor puncture wounds to severe nerve damage or infection. It’s even possible for victims to contract rabies if the dog hasn’t been vaccinated. Chronic pain, disfigurement, psychological trauma are other common aftereffects of these aggressive encounters with dogs.

It’s important that victims understand they have rights under Illinois law when it comes to dog bite injuries:

• The legal owner of the animal is liable if their pet causes harm without provocation.

• A claim must be filed within two years from the date of the incident.

• If injured while trespassing or provoking an attack, your right to pursue compensation might be limited.

Illinois operates under a “strict liability” rule for dog attacks meaning there’s no need for victims to prove negligence on behalf of the owner as long as three conditions are met:

1. You were behaving peacefully,

2. You didn’t provoke the attack

3. You hadn’t trespassed onto private property without explicit permission at the time of injury

However, navigating the legal terrain can be overwhelming especially when grappling with recovery so having a knowledgeable attorney by your side can significantly increase your chances at securing comprehensive compensation.

Carlson Bier prides itself on providing personalized client service – understanding each case’s uniqueness – and passionately advocating for our clients’ best interests. Our top priority is earning maximum financial returns so you can focus purely on healing both physically and emotionally from this daunting experience.

Particular areas where compensation might be warranted include medical expenses (both current and future), lost wages or employment opportunities, property damage, pain and suffering, psychological counseling, cost of physical therapy or rehabilitation and in some cases punitive damages aimed at punishing particularly negligent dog owners.

Our legal team conducts thorough investigation into each case. Gathering police and medical records, interviewing witnesses, tracking down surveillance footage if applicable – every detail matter immensely to us because it largely contributes to building a compelling lawsuit for you.

In addition to dog bite injuries, Carlson Bier also handles various other personal injury suits like automobile accidents or premises liability claims. Our extensive breadth of focus allows us the opportunity to leverage vast industry knowledge in representing our clients’ best interests at all times. Painstakingly focused on safeguarding your rights under the law our attorneys’ rigorous pursuit of justice is unwavering regardless how hefty or minor damages involved might be.

Ready for action? We invite you now to take the first step towards obtaining the strong advocacy you need after a dog bite injury. Use the button below to get free assessment on what your case is really worth. With no obligations involved – it’s time to explore how Carlson Bier could make meaningful difference in your life today! Trust us with addressing your concerns surrounding these harmful encounters while we pursue just compensation on your behalf relentlessly.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Auburn Gresham Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Auburn Gresham

Areas of Practice in Auburn Gresham

Bicycle Crashes

Proficient in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Burn Burns

Providing professional legal services for patients of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Hospital Incompetence

Delivering experienced legal representation for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Obligation

Handling cases involving dangerous products, delivering adept legal guidance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Abuse

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Trip Occurrences

Specialist in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking restitution for their losses.

Birth Injuries

Delivering legal aid for households affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Crashes

Crashes: Devoted to supporting patients of car accidents obtain fair remuneration for wounds and damages.

Motorcycle Incidents

Specializing in providing legal services for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Offering expert legal support for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for injuries.

Worksite Mishaps

Concentrated on assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Damages

Dedicated to providing dedicated legal assistance for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Harms

Expertise in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Expert in legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Death

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and skilled legal support to ensure justice.

Spine Injury

Focused on representing individuals with paralysis, offering professional legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​