...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Ava

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you, or a loved one, are dealing with the aftermath of a dog bite injury in Ava, rest assured that professional legal help is within reach. At Carlson Bier, we specialize in representing victims of such incidents effectively and compassionately. Navigating through the nuances of animal law can be overwhelming without experienced guidance. Our dedicated team focuses on this specialized field for Illinois residents providing robust legal support when it matters most. Dog bites can inflict severe physical pain and emotional distress; our commitment is to alleviate these burdens by securing suitable compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, or any related trauma suffered as a result of a canine attack. Furthermore,’ Carlson Bier’s sharp negotiating skills and litigation savvy aim to ensure justice prevails irrespective of how intricate your case might appear initially Therefore when seeking resolute representation after dog bite injuries look no further than the seasoned professionals at Carlson Bier: Serving Illinois diligently.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Ava Illinois

As a leading Illinois-based personal injury law firm, Carlson Bier represents clients who have experienced the unfortunate occurrence of dog bite injuries. Our dedicated attorneys possess unparalleled expertise in this area, demonstrating a superior understanding of the intricacies involved with personal injury cases pertaining to dog bites.

Dog bites can lead to severe physical and emotional trauma. Their impact spans beyond momentary pain or discomfort; victims often face ongoing medical treatments, psychological distress, loss of work days and substantial medical expenses. Irrespective of whether the incident transpired on public or private property, avenues for legal redress can be explored if another party’s negligence contributed to it.

Specifically in Illinois, laws underscore strict liability when assessing responsibility for dog bite occurrences. This means that a dog owner stands liable should their pet cause injury to an individual – not necessarily through biting alone but via actions such as jumping or running into someone. It is imperative for people encountering such situations to familiarize though with certain key aspects:

• Strict Liability: In contrast with the ‘one-bite rule’ enforced by some states wherein owners are only held accountable if aware of the dog’s tendency to bite, Illinois embraces strict liability ensuring responsible parties are held accountable regardless.

• Landlords: Landlords could also bear responsibility under circumstances where they were cognizant about a tenant’s dangerous pet yet failed to take necessary action.

• Contributory Negligence: Potential compensation could diminish or be eliminated entirely if it is proved that the injured party provoked the animal intentionally.

These elements underline how multifaceted legal matters correlate with dog-bite incidents can be; however, approaching them isn’t as overwhelming as one might think when aligned with suitable representation like our skilled team at Carlson Bier.

With us by your side tackling key tasks becomes hassle-free – ranging from gathering information surrounding the event (witness stories and medical reports), countering contributory negligence claims safeguarding fair compensation based on total damages both short and long term.

Seeking the assistance of qualified legal counsel ensures that victims are aptly empowered to pursue just compensation. Navigating the aftermath of a dog bite is undeniably daunting, but you don’t have to do it alone. This process involves numerous complexities that require intimate knowledge of respective laws, regulations and procedures – exactly what we at Carlson Bier bring to the table for our clients.

Injuries incurred from dog bites can be traumatic and life-changing; subsequently voicing your situation through competent representation is crucial in ensuring fair restitution rooted in justice rather than intimidation or ignorance of your lawful rights.

It’s important to remember, however, that every case is unique with varying circumstances dictating potential outcomes. Therefore, having a dedicated team with comprehensive knowledge assists in drafting reliable strategies according to each case’s distinct aspects.

At Carlson Bier, we understand these profound implications related to personal injury incidents like dog bites. With compassion and resilience ingrained in our ethos, rest assured we stand ready not merely as advisors but allies in this challenging journey toward rightful resolution.

Discretion and dedication form the backbone of our services – promising absolute confidentiality concerning all details entrusted upon us whilst earning your trust by prioritizing your best interests through every stage within this journey comprising claim filing up till ensuing litigation representation.

Lastly, expedited action is absolutely critical when tackling any sort of personal injury incident including dog bites – particularly given statutory time frames implemented by Illinois law enforcing specified windows for lawsuit initiation post-incident occurrence hence avoid unnecessary impediments down line on account delayed actions leading potentially missed opportunities meaningful closure make note sow seeds fruitful resolution today by taking first step forward with Carlson Bier part team click button below attain personalized valuation regards possible worth ensuing case .

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Ava Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Ava

Areas of Practice in Ava

Bicycle Mishaps

Expert in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Providing specialist legal services for people of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Medical Carelessness

Ensuring dedicated legal advice for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Obligation

Addressing cases involving faulty products, extending specialist legal guidance to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Abuse

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble & Fall Mishaps

Adept in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking compensation for their suffering.

Infant Wounds

Offering legal support for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Accidents: Devoted to supporting victims of car accidents receive appropriate payout for wounds and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Semi Crash

Providing expert legal representation for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for losses.

Construction Site Accidents

Focused on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Brain Harms

Specializing in providing dedicated legal advice for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Traumas

Skilled in tackling cases for victims who have suffered damages from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Crashes

Specializing in legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Undeserved Demise

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and professional legal support to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Damage

Dedicated to supporting persons with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​