FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Ava

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

After experiencing a pedestrian accident in Ava, choosing Carlson Bier is an optimal decision to protect your rights. As leading personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, we are committed to providing exceptional legal representation for those affected by such unfortunate incidents. Pedestrian accidents often bring significant physical and emotional trauma along with financial implications. Our firm, distinguished by years of successful verdicts and settlements across generous practice areas, offers dedicated support when it counts the most. We seek fair compensation for our clients’ medical bills, loss of income potential,inability to lead an ordinary life and extended rehabilitation costs that arise due to pedestrian accidents; employing measured strategies perfected over decades in civil litigation Despite geographic distance owing to service provisions statewide within Illinois – , developing a solid attorney-client relationship remains foremost for us at Carlson Bier even if you’re located in Ava or anywhere across this great state because every case matters…and so do you!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Ava Illinois

Navigating the aftermath of a pedestrian accident can be overwhelming, making it essential to have dedicated legal experts at your side. Such is the expertise offered by Carlson Bier, your personal injury lawyer group in Illinois. We specialize in representing victims of pedestrian accidents, ensuring that you aren’t left navigating the complex world of insurance and liability alone.

Pedestrian accidents are often treated with heightened severity due to pedestrians’ vulnerability compared to vehicle occupants. The resulting injuries can be catastrophic or fatal, leading to significant medical expenses and emotional trauma. It’s crucial that pedestrian accident victims understand their rights and how they can seek compensation appropriately.

– Most pedestrian accidents occur when drivers fail to yield right-of-way.

– Distracted driving is a leading cause—this includes texting or talking on cell phones while driving.

– Impaired driving involving drugs or alcohol also accounts for many incidents.

– High-speed areas create situations where vehicles cannot stop quickly enough if someone steps out into the street.

When such an unfortunate incident occurs, it’s important not only to obtain immediate medical attention but also get legal representation swiftly. This ensures preservation and collection of any evidence necessary for building a robust case against negligent parties.

In Illinois, Pedestrian Accident Laws operate primarily under comparative negligence and statute of limitations rules:

* Comparative Negligence: This rule allows a damaged party to recover compensation even if they are partially at fault, although their award will shrink in proportion with their degree of responsibility.

* Statute of Limitations: Under this rule in Illinois, you generally have two years from the date of accident occurrence within which you should file a personal injury lawsuit.

Here at Carlson Bier, we work diligently towards securing fair compensation for all our clients’ economic damages (direct financial losses) such as medical bills and lost wages as well non-economic damages (psychological harms) like pain & suffering or emotional distress.

We believe in lending our clients more than just legal representation. We offer guidance, emotional support and ensure your voice is heard in the judicial system. Our dedicated law team works tirelessly to ease the burden of recovery so you can focus on more pressing matters—your health and well-being.

Our collaborative approach involves careful study and evaluation of each case, leveraging our vast experience and knowledge of pedestrian accident laws in Illinois to devise unique strategies that champion our clients’ needs.

Furthermore, to ease any financial strain, Carlson Bier operates on a ‘No Win-No Fee’ basis; we do not charge any fees unless we win compensation for you. This commitment reflects in everything we do—fighting relentlessly against insurance companies who might attempt to undervalue your claim or dismiss it altogether.

We urge you not only to familiarize yourself with rights but also take prompt steps towards safeguarding them by appointing a competent legal ally. Not every personal injury attorney can successfully represent pedestrian accident victims—it takes skill, dedication, meticulousness, empathy – all of which are hallmarks of Carlson Bier.

So don’t wait for the clock to tick further! Reach out today for a free consultation where we will review your case’s merits without obligation. Together we can help assess your situation and learn how much compensation could be rightfully yours—a steppingstone towards holistic recovery.

Click below because YOU deserve adequately compensated for the hardships thrust upon by unforeseen circumstances. Let Carlson Bier guide you through this challenging phase fuelling confident strides into future security and relief.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Ava Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Ava

Areas of Practice in Ava

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Proficient in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Scald Damages

Offering adept legal services for victims of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Physician Negligence

Providing expert legal support for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Responsibility

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, delivering adept legal assistance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip & Stumble Mishaps

Skilled in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking recovery for their losses.

Infant Damages

Supplying legal assistance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Accidents: Dedicated to aiding sufferers of car accidents secure just remuneration for damages and losses.

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

18-Wheeler Collision

Extending expert legal assistance for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for harms.

Building Crashes

Focused on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Brain Impairments

Dedicated to delivering compassionate legal support for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Injuries

Proficient in managing cases for persons who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Specializing in legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Passing

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and adept legal services to ensure justice.

Backbone Harm

Focused on defending patients with paralysis, offering dedicated legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​