FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Aviston

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating the aftermath of a dog bite injury can be an overwhelming process, but you don’t have to face these challenges alone. The dedicated attorneys at Carlson Bier have extensive experience in this precise area of personal injury law. Handling such sensitive cases with the utmost diligence, expertise and compassion is their hallmark. Their meticulous understanding of the nuanced Illinois laws surrounding dog bite injuries enables them to vigorously advocate for their clients’ rights while obtaining optimal settlements. With Carlson Bier adeptly leading your case, rest assured that they will leave no stone unturned when it comes to securing your lawful compensation for medical expenses, wage loss and emotional trauma resulting from a traumatic canine attack incident. They stand ready to offer reliable legal advice on liability issues and potential lawsuit avenues too; meticulously guiding you toward hopeful resolution throughout every step of complex litigation landscape. Should Aviston residents find themselves suffering from such unfortunate incidents, permit Carlson Bier’s proficient team – well-versed in Illinois statutes -to assist towards achieving justice deserved by each client involved in dog-bite related incidents.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Aviston Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our highly skilled team of personal injury attorneys is committed to ensuring justice for victims of dog bite injuries across the state of Illinois. As your dedicated representatives, we bring years of experience navigating the complexities of personal injury law to deliver exemplary results that cater to your unique situation and needs.

Dog bite injuries can be severe, often leading to serious complications beyond physical wounds including emotional trauma, fear and anxiety disorders. Our thorough understanding of these outcomes puts us in a distinctive position; allowing us to tackle not only the immediate circumstances but also future implications caused by such injuries.

In Illinois, certain key factors must be considered when pursuing legal outcomes for dog bite incidents:

• Strict Liability Rule: In Illinois, the law holds dog owners strictly liable for any harm their pets cause irrespective of the animal’s past behavior.

• No Provocation: The victim must demonstrate that they did not provoke the attack and were conducting themselves peacefully before sustaining the injury.

• Legally Present: Victims should typically have been legally present at the location where the attack happened – either having explicit permission from the property owner or being on public property.

Pursuing compensation for dog bite injuries has several advantages. First, it serves as reparation for medical expenses incurred—leaving no stone unturned from hospital bills down to recovery therapies. Additionally it provides financial support during recuperation periods which might involve absence from work translating into lost wages or income. It further accounts for pain and suffering endured by victims due to such traumatic incidents—a factor often overlooked outside legal rehabilitative ambits.

Notwithstanding these potential benefits & legal frameworks, prevailing in a dog bite lawsuit requires detailed knowledge about intricate components rest within State laws coupled with an adept ability in litigation practice—which is exactly what you get partnering with Carlson Bier’s experienced Personal Injury Attorneys.

One thing crucial to note is that time is integral in all these proceedings. Filing a claim post sustaining a dog-bite injury must adhere to the statute of limitations established in Illinois which is within 2 years from when the injury occurred. Delaying this could resultantly threaten your eligibility to pursue for compensation.

To comprehend how liability rules apply to a specific case, courts consider numerous factors including location of the accident, any contributory negligence on part of the victim and breed-specific legislation among other components. Seeking professional help thus allows thorough evaluation and interpretation factoring these different elements thereby ensuring all bases are covered in course to seeking justice as well as potential compensation.

While every dog bite case is unique & distinct it fundamentally boils down to – effective negotiations with insurance companies or competent representation if matters escalates into litigation…that’s where we at Carlson Bier comes into play—offering personalized legal services backed by solid professional acumen to support you through this daunting process; turning unpredictable hurdles into achievable milestones!

Even though convenient geographical proximity remains important while selecting representation, our Team abides strictly with Illinois state laws refraining from false promotions about our physical presence—in order to uphold both professionalism and integrity.

Navigating around legalese post traumatic incidents could be overwhelming without proficient counsel. Let us at Carlson Bier shoulder this burden alongside you; assisting not only in deciphering legality measures but also steering steadily towards an optimal outcome beneficial for yourself.

At times one might underestimate gravity of their situation, leaving unclaimed what rightfully belongs to them! Hence click below NOW,in order to discover the potential worth your case holds– Informative, clear-cut appraisal just a click away!– Tailored specifically for YOU by legal experts excelling at such assessments! All aforementioned information garners vital importance honed through stringent laws that protect YOU because YOUR well-being matters most importantly. So don’t wait anymore; take control TODAY with Carlson Bier, personal injury attorneys committed sincerely towards helping you reclaim your life’s equilibrium post challenging times such as these!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Aviston Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Aviston

Areas of Practice in Aviston

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Proficient in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Traumas

Providing adept legal advice for individuals of major burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Medical Carelessness

Offering expert legal assistance for persons affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Responsibility

Managing cases involving faulty products, supplying specialist legal guidance to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Abuse

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Fall Injuries

Specialist in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking compensation for their losses.

Infant Harms

Providing legal guidance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Accidents: Focused on helping sufferers of car accidents gain just recompense for damages and losses.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Focused on providing representation for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

18-Wheeler Crash

Delivering adept legal representation for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for harms.

Worksite Mishaps

Dedicated to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Head Traumas

Dedicated to delivering dedicated legal assistance for clients suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Harms

Skilled in dealing with cases for people who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Jogger Incidents

Committed to legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Demise

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and professional legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Damage

Committed to assisting clients with backbone trauma, offering professional legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​