...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Bicycle Accidents in Barrington Hills

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the aftermath of a bicycle accident in Barrington Hills, you need exceptional legal advocacy. You require Carlson Bier, an eminent personal injury law firm revered across Illinois for its success and reliability when handling bicycle-related cases. Our lawyers at Carlson Bier are not phased by complex litigation landscape and can seamlessly navigate it to protect your rights and interests. We have consistently demonstrated proficiency in recovering significant damages for victims overwhelmed by medical bills, lost wages, or pain inflicted due to reckless driving around cyclists. Standout capabilities such as high-level negotiation skills and the eager pursuit of justice characterize our attorneys who make sure recouping compensation is never an uphill battle for bicycling enthusiasts on Barrington Hills’ roads. Working actively with cycling communities over time has instilled deep understanding within our team about unique challenges faced during bicycle accidents resulting in optimal assertive action from us – solidly based in professional finesse rather than blind ambition; making Carlson Bier a wise choice if seeking out excellence after being sidelined due to unfortunate cycling accidents.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Barrington Hills Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the profound impact bicycle accidents can have on victims and their families. As devoted personal injury attorneys operating in Illinois, we’re here to consult with you about your rights and legal options after such an unfortunate incident.

Bicycle accidents are complex events that often involve unique dynamics differing significantly from other vehicular incidents. Firstly, bicyclists lack protection compared to drivers within automobiles. They are exposed directly to the hazards around including heavy moving vehicles leading to far more severe injuries when subjected to a collision. Secondly, many drivers hold misconceptions of cyclists’ rights on the road which further inflates their risk quotient.

Understanding these complexities is critical for any victim pursuing justice following a bicycle accident:

– A cyclist has as much right to be on most public roads used by motor vehicles –with only limited exclusions applying.

– Cycling regulations differ across various quadrants even within the same city which could affect liability determination in an accident.

– Bicycle construction with its variable features may play into how an accident transpired; thus requiring insightful scrutiny during investigations.

– Accident scene preservation or evidences therein like tire skid marks could build crucial elements for your case.

Another vital dimension is Illinois Bicycle Rules and Laws which form the foundation for discerning primary fault in bike-related incidents. Detailed rules exist regarding where cyclists should ride in traffic, how they should signal turns or stops, amongst countless other details – becoming decisive factors while asserting negligence by motorists involved.

Insurance matters also gather significant weightage post-bicycle accidents given claim policies varying highly between auto insurance vs cyclist’s coverage. There’s need for careful evaluation of all existing police reports, damage estimates, medical bills coupled with cogent argumentation especially if insurers propose unjust settlements excluding full compensation due for your agonising encounters.

As so much depends upon accurate understanding of Bike laws and relevant Illinois statutes along with robust advocacy skills navigating assiduous processes involved– it helps immensely having experienced personal injury attorney by your side through such testing times. That’s precisely where we, at Carlson Bier step in.

Beyond guiding you ardently about intricate legalities involved, our dedicated lawyers work relentlessly gathering critical evidence, consulting required experts to craft compelling arguments protecting your rights and interests. Whether it entails negotiating with insurers or confronting them in a court of law for fair compensation claim; whether personal, parental accountability is implicated or corporate liability comes under scrutiny – our team presents a formidable front ensuring justice served in each case we undertake.

Coming back to victims of bike accidents looking for expert consultation: If you’ve been injured due to a driver’s negligence while cycling, do not let the adversity sink you into despair or financial distress. Our firm believes fervently that everyone deserves quality representation regardless of their ability to pay upfront which is why we operate on contingency fee basis; meaning you owe us nothing unless we succeed in securing your rightful compensation.

Our track record bears testimony of countless individuals who’ve found clarity amid chaos and recovery from undue hindrances post unfavourable bicycle incidents – thanks largely to our dedicated professional services standing by their side when they needed them most. So if you find yourself searching “Personal Injury Lawyer near me”, remember every second counts!

Let Carlson Bier be your helping hand towards navigating complex yet essential world of claims after unfortunate bicycle accidents within Illinois boundaries. To know more – how much might actually be claims-worthy in context of your specific situation – scroll down now; click on the button below labeled ‘Find Out Case Worth’. You’re just one step away from finding out what could change life’s current trajectory leading towards justified recompense waiting at the other end!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Barrington Hills Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Barrington Hills

Areas of Practice in Barrington Hills

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Providing professional legal help for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Physician Negligence

Offering dedicated legal services for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Accountability

Managing cases involving problematic products, offering professional legal guidance to individuals affected by defective items.

Aged Mistreatment

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Stumble Accidents

Skilled in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking recovery for their harm.

Neonatal Wounds

Supplying legal support for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Incidents: Dedicated to aiding clients of car accidents secure appropriate payout for harms and impairment.

Scooter Crashes

Expert in providing legal support for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Semi Incident

Providing professional legal representation for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for injuries.

Construction Accidents

Concentrated on defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Head Damages

Focused on extending professional legal assistance for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in managing cases for people who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Accidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Passing

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and experienced legal representation to ensure fairness.

Spine Injury

Focused on supporting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​