...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Barrington Hills

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When complications arise from dog bite injuries in Barrington Hills, Carlson Bier emerges as the preeminent choice for skilled legal guidance. Residents reliant on cutting-edge expertise and proven results trust us to navigate complex personal injury laws that Illinois holds. Marshalling years of successful litigation experience, Carlson Bier reduces uncertainties while championing your right to compensation. Our accomplished local team comprehensively understands statutory limits and intricacies in liability claims surrounding dog bite injuries. We are devoted to our clients – vigorously defending their rights while maintaining an unwavering focus on maximum recovery for medical expenses, loss of income or pain endured due to a violent canine encounter. At Carlson Bier, we consistently strive not just for favourable verdicts but also towards ensuring survivors regain confidence post traumatic events such as these incidents bring about by offering unparalleled service quality with determination and empathy at its core. The choice is clear when seeking formidable representation: Choose professionalism; choose resilience; place your faith in justice pursued through Carlson Bier’s matchless acumen within the realm of Dog Bite Injuries Law.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Barrington Hills Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in representing and advocating for victims of dog bite injuries, ensuring their rights under Illinois law are fully protected. We understand the adverse impact that a canine attack can potentially have on an individual’s life – physically, emotionally, and financially. Our dedicated team is committed to providing comprehensive legal support to those affected by such unfortunate incidents.

Dog bite injuries can range from mild scratches to more serious wounds which may require excessive medical treatment including plastic surgery. Furthermore, trauma experienced during a canine attack could lead to enduring psychological distress. Victims might face fear or anxiety post-incident influencing their overall quality of life.

• The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports about 4.7 million dog bites occur annually in the United States.

• Approximately one out of five of these cases becomes infected.

• Children are disproportionately victimized by dog bites compared to adults.

• Over half of dog-bite fatalities occurred at home with familiar dogs.

The above statistics underline the severity and prevalence of such incidents in our communities today. It’s therefore crucial for victims not only to seek immediate medical attention post any canine assault but also consult with an experienced personal injury attorney who understands this specific area of law.

Illinois law iterates a clear stand on dog bite liability through its Animal Control Act which highlights “strict liability”. This implies that as long as the victim did not provoke the animal or wasn’t trespassing when attacked, the owner is held accountable irrespective of whether they were aware of the animal’s aggressive nature or not. While this offers some protection, navigating through these complex legalities often prove daunting without professional guidance. At Carlson Bier, our expertise extends beyond simply being your representatives — we serve as your advocates in understanding and asserting your rights within this unique intersectionality between animal laws and personal injury litigation.

Your choice in legal representation could indeed influence your chances at securing just compensation after falling victim to a dog bite incident. Here’s how Carlson Bier can assist:

• We aid in building strong cases through thorough investigation and documentation of the incident.

• Our legal expertise ensures accurate valuation of damages, determining both tangible costs like past and future medical expenses as well as intangible templates such as emotional distress, pain, suffering or loss of enjoyment of life.

• Moreover, our relentless commitment to your cause extends towards negotiation with insurance companies who might otherwise try minimizing potential claim amounts.

We at Carlson Bier believe it is not just about winning cases but ultimately restoring a sense of safety, dignity and normalcy for those affected by dog bite injuries. You may be inundated with questions post such an unfortunate incident – What are my legal rights? How will I pay for medical treatment? Am I entitled to compensation?

With diligent representation from our experienced personal injury attorneys that specialize in dog bites incidents, we assure answers to these pertinent concerns so you can focus on what matters most – your recovery. Remember you aren’t alone in confronting this ordeal; the dedicated team at Carlson Bier stands ready to offer comprehensive and compassionate legal support.

Potential clients seeking assistance are requested to click on the button below to assess the worthiness of their case. AS-Carlson Bier law firm stands firm not merely based on professional credentials but also due to our unwavering dedication toward client welfare. Quality representation should translate into assurance – assurance that partners in justice genuinely appreciate the trust vested upon them by victims dealing with trauma. Allow us at Carlson Bier opportunity to guide you through post-injury journey proficiently ensuring your entitlements under Illinois law neither overlooked nor undervalued.

Please note: While we strive for excellence in representing personal injury litigants all across Illinois state, we sincerely respect regulatory guidelines pertaining office locations thereby avoiding misleading advertisements regarding our physical presence. However, queries reaching us thus shall receive prompt attention regardless of where they originate from within state jurisdiction – ‘cos empathy mustn’t be bound by geographical boundaries!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Barrington Hills Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Barrington Hills

Areas of Practice in Barrington Hills

Bike Incidents

Expert in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Burns

Giving adept legal help for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Clinical Misconduct

Providing expert legal assistance for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Responsibility

Handling cases involving problematic products, providing expert legal help to customers affected by defective items.

Geriatric Abuse

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Fall Accidents

Expert in handling trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking compensation for their losses.

Neonatal Damages

Providing legal guidance for households affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Crashes

Collisions: Focused on assisting victims of car accidents obtain fair compensation for damages and impairment.

Motorcycle Accidents

Dedicated to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Offering expert legal advice for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for harms.

Building Site Collisions

Focused on supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Head Impairments

Specializing in ensuring expert legal services for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Proficient in tackling cases for clients who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unfair Death

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and skilled legal representation to ensure redress.

Spine Damage

Committed to defending persons with backbone trauma, offering expert legal guidance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer