...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Barry

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

As the victim of a dog bite injury, securing qualified legal representation is paramount for ensuring you’re justly compensated. Carlson Bier has proven expertise in this area, specializing in personal injury cases such as your own. Recognized throughout Barry for their formidable skills, they operate within an unyielding commitment to fighting on behalf of those who’ve suffered from canine-related injuries. Their adept team demonstrates a superior understanding and application of Illinois laws concerning these incidents, extending support every step of the way—from collecting evidence and handling negotiations with insurance firms—to guiding you through complex court proceedings should litigation become necessary. As responsible advocates armed with experience and tenacity that sets them apart from other legal teams, Carlson Bier promises comprehensive assistance at all stages — from initial consultation to final resolution— promoting your best interests above anything else. When dealing with dog bite injuries – no matter how simple or severe – it’s crucial to employ proficiency like theirs; because they understand what it takes ensure optimal outcomes in each case’s unique circumstances.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Barry Illinois

Incurring injury from a dog bite can be a devastating experience. This is the realm of expertise that we, at Carlson Bier, consistently navigate and we are highly knowledgeable about laws in Illinois pertaining to such cases. We aim to equip you with adequate information concerning your rights as a victim of Dog Bite Injuries, and provide professional counsel on how to proceed legally.

Under Illinois law, if a dog attack or any other animal-related mishap has taken place which resulted in an injury – minor or severe – the owner should bear responsibility for the financial burden caused by their pet’s action. It doesn’t matter whether it happened at home, in a public place, or elsewhere– regardless of location severity of past behavior exhibited by the dog.

There are several necessary criteria for proving liability after one suffers a Dog Bite Injury. These include,

• Proof that the said defendant is indeed the owner of the canine.

• Establishment beyond any reasonable doubt that there was no provocation towards the animal prior to attack while still adhering to peaceable conduct.

• The occurrence must have happened when lawfully present on either private or public property.

It is also imperative to know there is causation linked between injuries suffered and being bitten by a particular dog. With these facts well laid out with irrefutable evidence like medical records substantiating damage incurred, owners might find themselves liable for damages brought upon third parties as outlined under Animal Control Act provision 16, Chapter 510 act 5/16 (Illinois Compiled Statutes)

Sound legal representation guarantees victims they recover all that’s rightly theirs – not only restricted monetary damages attributed to immediate treatment costs but also compensations factoring in emotional distress suffered due disastrous experiences and life-long consequences lingering thereafter; effects truly affect quality-of-life.

While exploring options available post-trauma emanating from Dog Bite Injuries – ensuring comprehensive understanding regarding intricacies involved within personal injury law isn’t easy but definitely attainable. We, Carlson Bier group are always ready to provide expert legal advice on such matters derived from our long-standing profession in getting victims their due justice.

Believe it or not, these types of injuries rack up millions in medical bills every year across the country. Starting from simple first aid necessities all the way to more extensive care including plastic surgeries, not forgetting psychological assistance needed for trauma management – All these need not be dismissed merely as random incidents; they can indelibly affect one’s emotional well-being and alter future living habits.

At Carlson Bier, we strive to fight tirelessly in securing righteous resolution for victims deeply affected by dog bites; steadfast in committing high standards required while dealing with complexities entailed when traversing this unfortunate chapter of your life journey. Our vast professional experience under Illinois jurisdiction equips us most suitably to handle individual cases with zeal ensuring maximum recovery to alleviate burdens accrued post-injury period.

Journeying through experiences stemming out of Dog Bite Injuries shouldn’t be traveled alone. Protection guaranteed by law remains rightfully yours. As a committed team at Carlson Bier, we aim tirelessly divert appropriate energy towards imposing accountability on those whose negligence brought about unwarranted discomfort within personal spaces – an integral part of our dedicated service offering immense value leading each client along rightful paths towards worthwhile remediation.

Are you curious to know how much your case is worth? Please do click on the button below. Discover the potential compensation value attached to your claim today – We’re here for you!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Barry Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Barry

Areas of Practice in Barry

Bike Mishaps

Expert in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Offering expert legal assistance for individuals of major burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Healthcare Malpractice

Extending expert legal assistance for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Accountability

Managing cases involving unsafe products, providing expert legal guidance to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Trip Injuries

Adept in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking compensation for their suffering.

Newborn Damages

Delivering legal support for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Incidents

Collisions: Committed to guiding victims of car accidents gain equitable payout for hurts and destruction.

Motorcycle Accidents

Committed to providing representation for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Trucking Crash

Delivering expert legal assistance for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for damages.

Construction Collisions

Concentrated on representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Brain Damages

Dedicated to delivering professional legal support for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Damages

Specialized in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unfair Fatality

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and expert legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Harm

Dedicated to defending persons with paralysis, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​