FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Barry

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been the unfortunate victim of a pedestrian accident in Barry, it’s critical to seek the capable and experienced legal counsel that Carlson Bier can offer. As specialists in personal injury law with a strong emphasis on Pedestrian accidents, our commitment lies in showering clients with formidable legal assistance aimed at securing maximum compensation for all damages sustained. Headquartered in Illinois, we have relentlessly championed the rights of victims across different jurisdictions including Barry – consistently achieving favourable outcomes against insurance companies seeking to undermine your rightful claim. Employing our wealth of experience and meticulous attention to detail, we provide an unmatched level of representation while empathetically easing victims through this daunting process. Stricken by such an incident? Stand up for your rights today! Contact Carlson Bier – not only are we equipped with profound expertise but we inject our passion into every case ensuring justice is served aptly and promptly. Don’t let any semblance of doubt hinder you from making us your preferred choice when chartering these murky waters; choose excellence – Choose Carlson Bier!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Barry Illinois

Navigating the legal landscape following a Pedestrian Accident can be challenging and overwhelming. This complexity calls for expert guidance from experienced attorneys like Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law group based out of Illinois. The team meticulously operates to ensure that your rights are protected and you receive just compensation for your losses.

Characterized by strenuous investigations and often involving multiple parties, pedestrian accidents demand unique attention and expertise. With years of experience upholding client interests in similar situations, Carlson Bier is well-equipped to maneuver through such intricate legal terrains. Litigations related to pedestrian accidents encompass several crucial aspects:

• Determining Fault: Pinning down the party responsible for a pedestrian accident is fundamental to any case. Often split among various roles including drivers, pedestrians themselves or even local municipalities failing to maintain roads, ascertaining fault demands extensive technical knowledge.

• Calculating Damages: While obvious damages involve medical bills and lost wages due to time off work, there could be latent damages like pain suffering or future financial strain resulting from permanent disabilities.

• Insurance Companies’ Responsibilities: Insurers may attempt to offer smaller settlements than victims deserve or avoid paying at all – worrying trials where attorneys at Carlson Bier excel in advocating for clients’ rights.

Understanding that time is of utmost importance in these cases, Carlson Bier ardently pursues swift justice without compromising on securing full compensation rightful provided under Illinois Law. Their contingent fee model ensures the effort put into your case mirrors its significance—absolutely no upfront fees until they secure victory/justice on your behalf.

Yet beyond successful litigation wrapped in professionalism lies empathy—a cornerstone sentiment motivating this proficient attorney group’s operations. Acknowledging the traumatic implications these accidents often impose on those involved (worse still if losing loved ones), post-trauma stress resonance doesn’t go unnoticed at Carlson Bier—the support extended transcends mere financial recuperation efforts covering emotional sustenance too.

If misfortune has placed you under the shadow of a pedestrian accident in Illinois, it’s invaluable to have reliable legal counsel like the team at Carlson Bier guiding your path toward justice. Their vast experience defending clients involved in similar accidents and their unmatched dedication towards upholding client rights make them a trustworthy choice for navigating these painstaking spaces. With their competent assistance combined with thorough knowledge of the nuances related to pedestrian accidents under Illinois law, they could significantly elevate your chances of securing appropriate compensation.

The financial implications associated with pedestrian accidents can be burdening indeed—medical bills piling up and being unable to work just adds more stress during an already-difficult time. But remember—you are not alone; help is at hand. Carlson Bier remains committed to battling against those daunting challenges beside you, unabatedly striving towards attaining deserved relief from suffered economic distresses this unfortunate event might have thrown upon you.

Don’t let uncertainty regarding potential compensation hold you back from seeking deserved justice for wrongs committed against you during such pedestrian mishaps. Take the first step towards understanding your rightful claim today by leveraging our keen expertise in Illinois personal injury law pertaining specifically to pedestrian accidents. We invite you to click on the button below; a simple yet significant move potentially vitalizing Paths leading away from distressing impacts persisting post-accident phase into promising alleys pulsating brighter futures where tranquilities aren’t mere aspirations but tangible realities within reach.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Barry Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Barry

Areas of Practice in Barry

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Focused on legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Flame Burns

Supplying expert legal assistance for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Medical Incompetence

Delivering expert legal services for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Accountability

Managing cases involving unsafe products, extending adept legal services to individuals affected by harmful products.

Senior Neglect

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Slip Occurrences

Professional in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking compensation for their suffering.

Newborn Damages

Providing legal guidance for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Accidents: Dedicated to assisting individuals of car accidents obtain reasonable remuneration for damages and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

18-Wheeler Crash

Extending adept legal support for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for losses.

Construction Incidents

Concentrated on advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Cognitive Injuries

Focused on delivering compassionate legal representation for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Damages

Specialized in addressing cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unfair Passing

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and professional legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Spine Impairment

Specializing in advocating for patients with paralysis, offering expert legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​