FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Batavia

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or a loved one encounter the traumatic event of a dog bite injury in Batavia, it’s essential to seek professional assistance that guarantees lawful compensation. This is where Carlson Bier steps in – an esteemed legal firm specialized in personal injury cases and particularly experienced with Dog Bite Injuries. Leveraging deep understanding and vast expertise, we relentlessly champion for our clients’ rights ensuring they receive the justice they deserve. Our record speaks for itself; prompt response to client enquiries, unconditional commitment to each case, and remarkable success rates set us apart from others. Furthermore, thanks to our extensive knowledge of Illinois laws regarding dog bites injuries such as leash law violations or inadequate fencing perimeters by pet owners, whatever your situation might be there is no better guidance than Carlson Bier’s expert litigators . Remember that time can be crucial in these matters: Contact Carlson Bier today – Serving those affected by canine-caused traumas effectively and efficiently while always prioritizing your best interests.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Batavia Illinois

At Carlson Bier, a reputable personal injury law firm based in Illinois, we understand the physical and emotional trauma dog bite incidents can inflict. Our team is committed to providing our clients with efficient legal procedures that help alleviate their suffering from these unfortunate occurrences.

Dog bites are more common than one might think, often resulting in severe injuries that demand immediate medical attention. Each year thousands of individuals become victims of dog bite injuries, ranging from minor scratches to serious wounds leading to infections or nerve damage. However, understanding the repercussions extends beyond just physical hard – there may be psychological impacts such as fear which may develop into phobias further affecting quality of life.

Countless factors contribute to the severity of dog bites including:

– The breed and size of the dog

– The age and health condition of the bitten individual

– The location and depth of the wound

– Any underlying medical conditions increase susceptibility to infection

As your dedicated personal injury attorneys, we wish to emphasize the potential complications that can follow a dog bite incident:

– Rabies: Although rare, rabies transferred via saliva during a bite remains one fatal risk.

– Infections: Since bacteria inhabit a dog’s mouth they may lead to serious bacterial infections.

– Psychological Trauma: Victims often suffer anxiety and traumatic stress post event.

Proper medical intervention at an early stage is crucial for a prompt recovery process but dwindling finances due to loss work hours or high medical bills should not impede you from seeking justice.

Illinois enforces strict liability laws concerning animal attacks which allow victims rightfully claim compensation for both physical harm endured as well as any psychological distress caused by fear instilled from an attack regardless if it was their first time biting someone expressing violent behavior before demonstrating importance adequate attorney representation when mitigating this headache claim’s complexities delivering apt settlement.

There’s profound misbelief e.g., “Beware owners armed oddly typical one-bite rule.” This points towards ignorance of a misinformed dog owner that you have to show the animal had bitten someone before it attacked you. In Illinois this isn’t true, here, if a dog bites someone without being provoked and the person didn’t trespass or try to commit some other tort in connection with the incident then the dog owner is responsible”

Our pursuit for justice doesn’t stop at just initiating legal proceedings against those rightfully accountable for your injuries; we extend our commitment by ensuring each client’s individual needs are met during their recovery journey. Whether it’s counseling sessions or coordinating with medical professionals, Carlson Bier stands by your side offering comprehensive assistance every step of the way.

The pain caused by a dog bite injury can change lives dramatically but that shouldn’t prevent one from getting what they deserve legally. At Carlson Bier, not only do we stand behind advocating rights personal injury victims but empower them face future confident knowing justice was served their favor.

If you have experienced an unfortunate incident involving a dog bite and require adept legal guidance through these testing times click on the button below. Discover how much your case could potentially be worth and let us utilize our expertise in personal injury law in assisting you every step of his/her healing journey – both emotionally and financially.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Batavia Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Batavia

Areas of Practice in Batavia

Bicycle Collisions

Specializing in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or risky conditions.

Fire Traumas

Offering adept legal services for people of grave burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Physician Carelessness

Delivering professional legal representation for persons affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Obligation

Handling cases involving unsafe products, extending skilled legal help to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Malpractice

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble and Fall Injuries

Adept in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking redress for their suffering.

Infant Harms

Offering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Mishaps: Devoted to helping patients of car accidents gain reasonable recompense for harms and losses.

Motorbike Mishaps

Focused on providing representation for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Big Rig Incident

Extending professional legal services for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for hurts.

Construction Collisions

Committed to supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Brain Impairments

Focused on providing specialized legal services for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Adept at tackling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Unjust Fatality

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and professional legal services to ensure compensation.

Neural Harm

Specializing in representing persons with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440