...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Beckemeyer

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with the distressing aftermath of a dog bite incident in Beckemeyer, consider partnering with Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law firm specializing in Dog Bite Injuries. Our seasoned team strategizes solutions informed by Illinois laws and utilizes distinct expertise acquired from handling previous cases effectively. We empathize with your trauma and align our goal towards securing rightful compensation for you to aid medical expenses, loss of income or any other impacts caused due to this unfortunate event. Skilled at navigating complex legal jargon for simpler understanding, Carlson Bier stands committed to helping victims regain normalcy after such experiences. Despite not being physically located in Beckemeyer, we offer seamless communication channels ensuring constant updates about case progressions from anywhere within Illinois; showing that geographical location doesn’t eclipse our commitment to service quality or fervor justice pursuit represents one primary reason why choosing Carlson Bier can make all difference for individuals combating aftermaths of incapacitating dog bite incidents.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Beckemeyer Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law and understand the complexities surrounding dog bite injuries. Our Illinois-based team is dedicated to delivering exceptional legal assistance that comprehensively addresses your specific circumstances. Dog bites can lead to severe physical trauma, emotional scars, and financial burdens due to medical expenses and loss of income. Navigating these challenges requires an experienced hand like ours who can adeptly guide you through the legal maze.

The nature and extent of injuries resulting from a dog bite can frighteningly vary. These might range from minor cuts or bruises to more life-altering complications such as nerve damage, facial injuries, infection risk, psychological distress, or in extreme cases – fatalities. As professional constant champions for victims’ rights, Carlson Bier recognises that thorough understanding of both statutory language and court interpretations are fundamental in proving liability for a dog bite incident under multiple doctrines including Negligence per se and Common-Law Negligence.

Moreover, we realize that one encounter with canine terror could dramatically impact your day-to-day operations leaving you grappling with:

• Unanticipated Medical Bills: Extensive treatment such as stitches, vaccination shots and cosmetic surgery are pricey necessities.

• Emotional Distress: Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) often follows traumatic incidents leading to increased mental health concerns.

• Lost Wages: Time spent recuperating may interrupt income flows creating another source of stress.

If perhaps there was contributory negligence involved; maybe insufficient warning signs were erected around the errant pet – we ensure meticulous analysis so critical evidence won’t be overlooked.

Illinois enforces strict liability regarding animal attacks meaning if an unprovoked dog causes injury while off-leash on public property or whilst unlawfully on private premises – its owner is directly responsible for damages incurred irrespective if they had prior knowledge about their pet’s propensity for violence. The Landlord Liability principle also adds levels to this equation which may hold landlords accountable depending on identifiable negligence.

Choosing Carlson Bier means choosing relentless advocates committed to securing full and fair compensation. Our exceptional legal resources coupled with seasoned trial experience empower us to design personalized strategies suitable for your distinctive circumstances. Whether advising clients about viable defense angles; shedding light on Statute of Limitations; or assisting victims decipher complex insurance policies, we take immense pride in providing quality counsel.

We believe that justice is blindly determined by intent and action – not strength or size. Hence, whether the perpetrator was a ferocious breed or a minimum-sized mutt, its past demeanor undeniably irrelevant if harm was inflicted unprovoked. It’s our mission to make certain that our community remains safe through stringent regulation enforcement – thereby enhancing responsible pet ownership.

The process of securing representation for your dog bite injury case should be stress-free and focused on healing instead of burdened by the nuances of litigation jargon. At Carlson Bier, simplifying this process begins from the first free consultation until maximum possible recovery – because we understand that you didn’t deserve it; no one does.

The pain and trauma from sustaining a dog bite can be overwhelming as burdens continue to multiply. However, you don’t have to face this alone! Reach out to Carlson Bier today for hard-hitting representation upholding strong ethical standards yet sympathetically prioritizing your best interest above all else.

Intrigued? We bet you are! For individualized legal guidance accurately estimating what your case could potentially be worth simply click the button below. Remember: Great virtues like justice will always triumph over aggression perpetuated without provocation so let’s collaborate at being victors in justice pursuit together!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Beckemeyer Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Beckemeyer

Areas of Practice in Beckemeyer

Bike Crashes

Proficient in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or perilous conditions.

Burn Wounds

Extending professional legal services for victims of severe burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Hospital Misconduct

Extending dedicated legal representation for patients affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Fault

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, providing professional legal services to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall and Trip Occurrences

Expert in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking recovery for their losses.

Newborn Harms

Offering legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Collisions: Committed to assisting victims of car accidents get just recompense for injuries and damages.

Motorcycle Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Providing specialist legal representation for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for losses.

Worksite Collisions

Dedicated to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Damages

Committed to delivering specialized legal support for patients suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Traumas

Adept at dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered damages from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Specializing in legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Passing

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and professional legal support to ensure justice.

Vertebral Damage

Dedicated to assisting individuals with paralysis, offering compassionate legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer