FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Bedford Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unfortunate event of a dog bite injury in Bedford Park, secure your rights with Carlson Bier. This exceptional law firm specializes in personal injury cases, particularly those involving animal injuries like dog bites. Navigating the complexities and nuances of Illinois laws to ensure maximum compensation is their strong suit. Our adept attorneys are profoundly skilled to handle every intricacy involving such distressing incidents. As abiding by Illinois advertising restrictions is paramount to us, we diligently serve victims without implying any specific locale allusion; distance doesn’t deter our commitment or affect our expertise in handling dog bite injury cases efficiently and successfully around Bedford Park vicinity . We not only fight for rightful compensation but also help uncover avenues other firms might overlook due to unfamiliarity with canine liability issues. With an impressive track record based on numerous triumphs throughout Illinois, choose Carlson Bier for effective representation that brings real results when it matters most—because being bitten shouldn’t equal being beaten!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Bedford Park Illinois

The Carlson Bier law firm, a renowned Illinois-based personal injury attorney group, thoroughly understands the profound physical and emotional distress dog bite injuries can impose upon an individual. Having years of expertise in this domain, we dutifully assert our relentless commitment to ensuring all possible legal courses are navigated prudently for tackling such tragedies effectively.

Typically, the aftermath of a traumatic dog bite often leaves victims feeling overwhelmed and uncertain about their options. Navigating through medical bills, loss of income due to inability to work or permanent scars can be unnerving experiences. The attorneys at Carlson Beir have built their reputation by championing the rights of dog bite victims thus helping them move forward with assurance.

Recognizing that each case carries unique intricacies, we strive diligently to secure rightful compensation for all our clients. Comprehensive knowledge about dog-bite laws and proven investigative skills enable us to craft robust strategies aimed at successful outcomes. We understand very well how crucial it is for the victim and their loved ones throughout these challenging times.

A pivotal element here is understanding the scope of dog bites law within Illinois:

• Strict Liability: Under Illinois law, if a pet causes harm without provocation while the injured person was behaving peacefully in a location where they were legally allowed to be – then the owner is considered liable.

• Leash Law: As per leash laws formulated in Illinois statutes (510 ILCS 5/6), dogs are always required to be under reasonable control which doesn’t pose threat or damage.

• One Bite Rule: Unlike other jurisdictions adhering one ‘bite rule,’ signifying liability only after previous aggressive behavior or attacks from particular dogs are noted, Illinois abstains from this provision.

No doubt these laws seem convoluted but don’t despair; fighting these battles alongside seasoned lawyers like those at Carlson Bier ensures you’re never alone. Numerous factors impact your claim’s worth – severity of injury; cost incurred due to medical treatments, rehabilitations, therapy; and emotional tribulations. Factoring these variables in, we diligently work towards getting you rightful compensation that mirrors the magnitude of your physical, financial and psychological suffering.

Traversing through this legal terrain aiming for justice shouldn’t be embarked upon alone. Our attorneys at Carlson Bier assure dedicated guidance offering a free initial consultation for understanding claims related to dog bite injuries. We ensure proactive communication is maintained with our clients ensuring they know each step involved in arriving at a fair settlement.

Remember, it’s crucial not to delay action given that any injury claim is subject to a statute of limitation. Consistent delay can significantly affect your eligibility to get rightfully compensated.

Now if you or anyone known to you has endured such harrowing ordeal due to an unfortunate dog attack, don’t let confusion deter you from exploring all possible recourse available by law. Trust Carlson Bier’s proficient personal injury attorneys with their competent legal insights and formidable courtroom representation skills. Even though we are based in Illinois, it doesn’t mean we can’t help those who reside outside our state lines; retaining local counsel allows us to handle cases irrespective of geography!

To end the apprehensions clouding your mind, tap into the wealth of experience our skilled legal team brings together! So why wait? Click on the button below: discover how much your case could potentially be worth! Remember you’ve nothing to lose but potentially plenty gain – time and opportunity waits for none! Allow us at Carlson Bier alleviate your anxieties while advocating tirelessly for gaining justice on your behalf.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Bedford Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Bedford Park

Areas of Practice in Bedford Park

Bicycle Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Extending skilled legal assistance for victims of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Ensuring expert legal assistance for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Fault

Handling cases involving unsafe products, offering adept legal assistance to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip and Stumble Mishaps

Skilled in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking justice for their damages.

Neonatal Injuries

Offering legal aid for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Car Accidents

Accidents: Committed to helping clients of car accidents secure fair compensation for damages and destruction.

Scooter Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal advice for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Truck Mishap

Delivering specialist legal services for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for losses.

Construction Mishaps

Committed to advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Brain Damages

Committed to extending expert legal support for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Traumas

Specialized in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered traumas from dog bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Specializing in legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Fatality

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and adept legal support to ensure justice.

Spine Injury

Dedicated to advocating for patients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440