FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Bellevue

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Facing a spinal cord injury is daunting, not only due to the physical and emotional trauma but also in terms of navigating legal complexities. This is where Carlson Bier comes into play. We are an experienced personal injury law firm committed to ensuring that individuals suffering from such injuries get the utmost justice they deserve. Our dedicated team has extensive experience with spinal cord cases making us well-equipped to fight fiercely for your rights in court if necessary. With us representing you, rest assured that every detail will be thoroughly examined and strategically used towards your compensation claim’s success regardless of its intricacy or complexity.

Our lawyers’ exceptional track record spans successful outcomes for numerous clients over years stands as testimony to our capabilities in handling such sensitive cases effectively while empathizing with victims’ medical and personal circumstances.

Partnering with Carlson Bier allows access to comprehensive legal support while proceeding through this challenging period after a life-altering incident; lending strength when it matters most – confronting unanticipated changes head-on without worrying about getting justice on your behalf because we make sure no stone remains unturned on this regard.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Bellevue Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that spinal cord injuries are life-altering. As an experienced group of personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, we’re acutely aware of how the physical suffering is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to this type of trauma. Life post-injury often presents itself with overwhelming medical expenses, lost income due to reduced work ability or inability to return to work at all, along with psychological distress and emotional hardship. Our dedicated team places your well-being as our top priority— ensuring you have access to legal resources in order for justice and compensation demands.

Now let’s talk about spinal cord injuries. The complexity lies in their diversity; damage can occur anywhere along the vertebral column, affecting different body systems depending upon which part of the spinal cord gets impaired. Spinal cord injuries primarily come under two categories: complete and incomplete injuries. In a complete injury scenario, there’s a total loss of sensation and function below the level where injury occurs. With incomplete injuries, only partial loss functions exists — meaning individuals still retain some form of sensory or motor function beneath their affected area.

Each individual case is unique, but here are some key aspects that commonly coincide within these categories:

– Quadriplegia: Often resultant from high cervical vertebrae injuries brings about paralysis below neck.

– Paraplegia: Arising from mid-to-lower spine injures triggering lower-body paralysis.

– Autonomic Dysreflexia: Common after severe spinal cord damages — this condition affects involuntary bodily functions like digestion or heart rate.

– Chronic Pain: About 80% report experiencing continual pain post SCI (spinal cord injury).

Spine-related traumas are notoriously difficult to tackle medically and can require accelerated accommodation improvements at home too for increased accessibility needs like wheelchair ramps or adapted bathrooms –adding financial strain onto already pressurized households.

Carlson Bier assists persons dealing with these unanticipated circumstances. Our knowledgeable team is committed to fighting for the rightful compensation you deserve, mitigating additional financial stress that could hinder your recovery process further.

In Illinois, it’s crucial to remember a statute of limitations is in place when dealing with personal injury cases like these; typically, victims have up-to two years from the date their injury occurred to file a lawsuit against guilty parties or insurances. Failing to adhere within this timeframe may waive your right to gain any recompense at all.

We realize reading and fully comprehending legal jargon often poses a challenge when you’re trying to negotiate critical medical procedures or adapt around physical impairments. Our firm prides itself on explaining intricate legal processes in simple, easy-to-understand terms so you can make informed decisions surrounding your case.

Choosing Carlson Bier represents more than just hiring expert attorneys; we offer support throughout multiple facets of the recovery journey – not only pursuing compensation on behalf of our clients but also fostering long-lasting relationships rooted in respect and empathy.

Don’t let potential roadblocks like medical bills, lost wages, insurance claim complexities dissuade you from seeking justice post-Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). Remember — immediate consultation with trained legal advisers educated in Illinois state statutes and SCI specificities helps lay down stronger foundations that ensure quicker resolution for your case.

Click through today – our highly proficient, compassionate lawyers are waiting patiently to guide you towards deserved peace of mind through securing appropriate settlements while tirelessly advocating respecting rights for spinal cord affected individuals in our community. Don’t sit wondering what your case might be worth; knowledge equals power! Click below for an insightful discussion geared towards transforming problematic scenarios into clear-cut solutions catered specifically around individual needs.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Bellevue Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Bellevue

Areas of Practice in Bellevue

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Expert in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Damages

Providing adept legal services for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Medical Incompetence

Delivering experienced legal advice for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Fault

Addressing cases involving defective products, offering adept legal guidance to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Senior Misconduct

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Fall Accidents

Expert in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking redress for their losses.

Newborn Injuries

Extending legal help for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Crashes: Focused on guiding victims of car accidents obtain equitable payout for damages and impairment.

Motorbike Crashes

Specializing in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Truck Accident

Providing adept legal advice for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for harms.

Construction Site Accidents

Concentrated on advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Brain Traumas

Dedicated to extending expert legal services for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Specialized in addressing cases for victims who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Accidents

Expert in legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Wrongful Demise

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and professional legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Trauma

Expert in advocating for individuals with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal services to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440