FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Benton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in tackling the complex legal ramifications associated with spinal cord injuries. Regarded as prominent personal injury lawyers across Illinois, our team undoubtedly stands amongst the most equipped and committed when it comes to addressing cases of this gravity. Disregarding geographical boundaries, we have demonstrated a consistent commitment to provide unperturbed support for clients grappling with life-altering situations in Benton and beyond. Supplementing our extensive experience is our dedicated focus on spinal cord related lawsuits which reinforces us as an eminent choice amongst potential claimants residing within Benton’s vicinity.

We proactively merge pragmatic methodology coupled with a compassionate understanding of the human condition to bring high-quality advocacy for your cause. Effectively ushering you through daunting legal proceedings – from claim filing nuances to meticulous deliberation of entitled compensation; Carlson Bier stands stalwartly by your side every step steered towards justice. With Carlson Bier at helm over your Spinal Cord Injury lawsuit, reside confidently within Benton knowing that expert representation is favorably accessible without undue compromise on service quality or proximity.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Benton Illinois

At the eminent law firm of Carlson Bier in Illinois, we specialize in providing an extensive range of legal support, specifically for personal injury cases. As a focused domain within our practice, we maintain a deep understanding and knowledge base centered around Spinal Cord Injuries. Our expert attorneys understand that spinal cord injuries are some of the most severe and life-altering incidents individuals can experience, with repercussions extending well beyond physical trauma.

Spinal cord injuries entail damage to any segment of the spinal cord or nerves at the tail end of the spinal canal. This often results in permanent changes not just physically but also emotionally and mentally for both victims and their loved ones. Poignantly characterized by alterations in strength, sensation, functionality below the site of injury along with loss of movement – either entire / partial (paralysis), conditions stem from various causes namely vehicle accidents, falls involving great heights, sports injuries or violent encounters like gunshot wounds.

Bearing significant expertise on this topic through years of representing clients with such severe afflictions, we comprehend twin types: Complete – leading to no sensory or motor function below level; Incomplete – which varies widely from individual individual wherein few functions may remain operative.

• Symptoms: Generally include extreme back pain/pressure in head/neck/back region; weakness/incoordination/disorganized mobility pattern; numbness/tingling sensation/burning discomfort or loss of bladder/bowel control.

• Treatment: Dependent upon severity it ranges from immobilization for mild injuries supporting recovery while surgery is necessary to remove fragments/pieces causing compression.

• Associated Complications: Secondary medical problems such as respiratory issues/deep vein thrombosis/impaired skin integrity/pain/spasms can occur post-incident urging continued healthcare checks.

Understanding that lawsuits revolving around such mishaps require explicit detail-oriented attention since they have long-term implications affecting future medical treatments moreover rightful compensation needs meting out for maintaining quality living post-injury ensuring best efforts for victim’s recovery, we combine professional and personal touch in handling these cases. Our attorneys work alongside leading medical professionals to comprehend terminology, issues involving both contemporary/ alternative treatments and future prognosis.

At Carlson Bier, we believe that being armed with information empowers our clients to make informed decisions regarding their legal recourse. It equally assists us in preparing an uncompromising case on your behalf. Active participation throughout process implies continuous exchange of knowledge about the aspects of law governing your unique circumstances thereby making the journey less daunting and more recoverable together.

Being a leader in providing prime service through Illinois state for personal injury legal assistance specifically dealing intricately with Spinal Cord Injuries we take immense pride in our diligent efforts contrasted against formidable results achieved so far besides fostering trust & reliable relationships built diligently with each client assuring them of standing by their side every step during this challenging life-altering period.

It is crucial to note that each case differs based on individual scenarios surrounding respective accidents hence requiring bespoke approach while calculating probable settlement sum. As such, understanding value assigned to particular incident’s decided elements within context such as severity type/duration/extensiveness/need lifelong care/accountability percentage plays significant role.

We welcome you now to take the next logical action towards securing your future. Click on the button below! Entrust us at Carlson Bier with finding out how much your case could be worth in terms of financial compensation. Remember it’s not only about considerable settlement; but also intending reassurance giving back control over one’s life post-such debilitating impairments. Together let’s reclaim ensuring best opportunity towards restoring functionality –ultimate benchmark indicating success within important facet called Life.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Benton Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Benton

Areas of Practice in Benton

Bike Incidents

Focused on legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Burn Burns

Offering skilled legal services for people of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Physician Misconduct

Delivering experienced legal support for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Obligation

Addressing cases involving problematic products, offering expert legal services to customers affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Misconduct

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip & Trip Injuries

Adept in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking restitution for their harm.

Infant Injuries

Supplying legal guidance for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Crashes

Mishaps: Concentrated on aiding patients of car accidents obtain equitable remuneration for wounds and losses.

Scooter Incidents

Focused on providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Trucking Crash

Delivering adept legal assistance for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for losses.

Construction Site Accidents

Focused on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Neurological Damages

Committed to delivering professional legal services for persons suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Traumas

Expertise in tackling cases for clients who have suffered harms from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Expert in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unjust Fatality

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and adept legal services to ensure justice.

Spine Harm

Specializing in assisting victims with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​