...

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Berkeley

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’ve experienced a slip and fall accident in Berkeley, finding a trusted law firm that deeply understands the complexities of personal injury law is crucial. That’s where Carlson Bier steps in – an Illinois-based legal powerhouse renowned for its impressive track record with such cases. Our skilled attorneys at Carlson Bier are exceptionally proficient in exploring all avenues to ensure victims get the justice they deserve. Having handled numerous slip and fall accidents, we fully comprehend the devastating aftermath of these incidents on individuals’ lives. We focus not only on liability but also delve into every potential source for compensation including owner negligence or defective conditions contributing to your mishap. When you’re partnered with us, rest assured we will vigorously represent your interests aiming for maximum rightful settlements or jury awards following falls caused by unsafe premises including ice-coated sidewalks, unsecured carpeting amongst others! Trust only Carlson Bier because when it comes down to fighting for justice after a horrific event like this – second best just isn’t good enough.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Berkeley Illinois

Established in Illinois, Carlson Bier law group overshadows the typical personal injury attorney services you might be accustomed to. Specializing predominantly in Slip and Fall Accidents cases, our team of professional attorneys weave a formidable defense this murky area presents. Understanding every nuance involved is not only essential but also forms the foundation of our commitments – such as demonstrating how we place specific emphasis on detailed analyses.

Slip and Fall Accidents pose a staggering number of litigant factors – each crucial to comprehend wholly for an effective strategy formation and execution. This is where Carlson Bier distinguishes itself among other attorney groups by focusing on fine details that make all the difference between winning and losing a case.

Starting with premises liability rules, we ensure victims understand their rights when these accidents happen on someone else’s property. Whether it’s exploring negligence or liabilities stemming from unsafe conditions, every possibility affecting your case gets scrutinized meticulously by our expert team.

We will also delve into the crux of slip and fall accident lawsuits; determining fault scientifically rather erroneously based on claimed facts alone. Winning such lawsuits relies largely on illustrating three key points: First, proving whether there was indeed an “unsafe condition,” next establishing the property owner’s knowledge about said condition yet ignored its rectification timely, and thirdly demonstrating convincingly that this intentional negligence led directly to your accident.

Our lawyers at Carlson Bier Law are adept at collecting substantial evidences required while preparing your lawsuit fostering special emphasis identifying medical treatments advised by professionals post-accident solely as a result of this catastrophic event.

• We pull records indicating immediate Emergency Room visits if any right after the accident.

• Showcasing actual medical bills depicting treatment required following patient assessments lining them realistically against standard costs.

• Harnessing evidence portraying loss incurred due to work absences attributed solely towards recovering from injuries sustained during incidents.

All accumulated resources combined with our seasoned acumen help build a formidable lawsuit primed to yield fair compensation for your losses while recovering from slip and fall accidents.

Carlson Bier Law also counsels you effectively about Illinois Statute of Limitations governing Slip and Fall Accidents. Individual state laws indicate a defined timeframe within which lawsuits can be filed following these incidents. Our representatives ensure your requests commence within these boundaries, circumventing potential dismissals due to late filing.

Furthermore, Carlson Bier separates itself with our unique enunciation of Modified Comparative Fault rule as per the stipulation in Illinois law. This decisive factor influences how fault percentages are divided between parties involved during settlement agreements or court decisions – implying no recovery if an injured party is 50% more at fault. We strive rigorously keeping you informed about legal dynamics constantly that hold a considerable impact on case conclusions.

Composition and delivery of professional advice addressing vital sticking points attributing directly towards cases fairness & success journey is what makes us stand out at Carlson Bier. Ultimately, our chief underlying principle always remains the same: Guiding you expertly when finding yourself embroiled in slip and fall accident lawsuits cum securing rightful compensation preserving dignity under all circumstances unyieldingly.

Take the next step in ensuring justice for your struggles; let us help evaluate the worth of your claim accurately based on our well-structured framework incorporated into our strategic approach, giving precedence additionally for emotional damages endured post-accident beyond mere financial setbacks alone.

Safeguarding interests firmly via championing effective resolutions forms but one half of this exercise as we also aim protecting rights vigilantly every step during this eventful process – Because here at Carlson Bier Law Group, YOU matter first! Click below right now to find out how much weightage could potentially be attributed toward your case effectively – Let’s start this journey together, today!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Berkeley Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Berkeley

Areas of Practice in Berkeley

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Fire Wounds

Offering adept legal advice for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Clinical Carelessness

Delivering experienced legal support for persons affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Accountability

Managing cases involving problematic products, delivering expert legal help to individuals affected by harmful products.

Senior Misconduct

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Trip Injuries

Skilled in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking recovery for their injuries.

Newborn Harms

Offering legal support for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Crashes: Concentrated on aiding clients of car accidents secure just compensation for wounds and harm.

Motorcycle Accidents

Focused on providing representation for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

18-Wheeler Accident

Ensuring expert legal support for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for injuries.

Construction Incidents

Engaged in defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Cerebral Damages

Specializing in delivering expert legal support for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Proficient in addressing cases for people who have suffered damages from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Undeserved Demise

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and expert legal guidance to ensure justice.

Spine Damage

Committed to defending victims with spine impairments, offering expert legal assistance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer