Bicycle Accidents in Berwyn

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re a cyclist in Berwyn faced with the challenging aftermath of an accident, Carlson Bier is your ideal ally. As respected motorcycle accidents attorneys, we are deeply knowledgeable about Illinois laws and regulations pertaining to such incidents. Bicycle mishaps can have severe implications, often leading to hefty medical bills along with physical injuries or psychological trauma. Our proficient team at Carlson Bier passionately advocates for cyclists’ rights safeguarding your interests in these complex litigation processes. With our superior legal expertise and dedicated customer service, we’ll guide you through each step verifying that justice is served and fair compensation acquired. Trust us to handle the intricacies associated with proving fault in bicycle accidents while keeping your best interest at heart throughout the process. Your safety on roads matters to us; therefore we fight relentlessly defending victims of careless drivers or city negligence causing biking accidents right here in Illinois without imposing any undue stress on our clients during this distressing period.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Berwyn Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we observe a stark increase in bicycle-related accidents over the years. As a premier law firm specializing in personal injury suits, it is our duty to inform and protect your rights while demystifying the complexities of bicycle accident cases.

Bicycle accidents can happen for several reasons: reckless drivers who fail to give way to cyclists, vehicle doors opening unexpectedly into a cyclist’s path, or even poor road conditions contributing to dangerous cycling situations. Each case has its individual characteristics that merit attention and customized representation.

Injuries resulting from these incidents range from minor cuts and bruises to severe medical conditions such as fractures, brain injuries, or spinal cord damage. The gravity of these potential outcomes necessitates an understanding of your legal options post-accident.

• One crucial aspect is determining liability – figuring out who was at fault for the accident.

• Understanding what compensation you’re entitled to – losses may not only be physical things but also intangible factors like loss of work income due to injury.

• Accessing evidence in support of your claim; this involves requests for CCTV footage or witness statements that corroborate your story.

• Negotiating with insurance companies on claims – insurers often try to minimize payouts by downplaying severity or casting doubt on details presented by victims without representation.

Our experienced team at Carlson Bier assesses each facet meticulously and builds strong claims founded on clear points of evidence. We follow up relentlessly on every lead so that you don’t have time wasted dealing with red tape when focusing on recovery should be uppermost.

Another critical factor routinely overlooked but integral in ensuring justice served revolves around nuances dictated by specific laws within Illinois regarding bike accidents—provisions our adept lawyers will interpret and apply they deem fit.

For instance:

• Whereas common sense suggests motorists would usually be held liable given size difference amongst others; it isn’t always straightforward according to Illinois statutes.

• Additionally, mastery of local regulations relating cycling paths versus shared roads and restrictive zones, interpretation of right-of-way situations against complex junction design layouts – all exemplify elements requiring specialist understanding.

Dedicated law-abiding cyclists have been our clients who found themselves entangled in legal claims far too dense for lay comprehension. It isn’t merely about familiarity with Illinois’ book of laws; rather, it’s about applying that knowledge to construct water-tight cases truly representative of your predicament.

At Carlson Bier, we ensure not only fair representation but also compassionate support grounded on shared understanding of the trauma you’ve endured. By guiding you each step personally rather than treating you as a statistic amidst faceless accident data, our aim is to make the process as comfortable as it can be for those bearing physical and emotional scars alike.

In this light, one might wonder what costs such premium service entails. Complicated legal battles ordinarily extend over long periods warranting substantial fees – surely getting through aftermath restorative treatment alone is weighty enough without enduring other hefty charges.

It’s here where Carlson Bier reaffirms its commitment towards genuinely affordable justice: Our fee system operates under a “No win-No fee” policy meaning clients aren’t obligated by any upfront cost until case concludes satisfactorily in their favor – True testament to confidence we continue placing within competence displayed consistently throughout decades-long histories delivering fruitful outcomes.

Taking the initiative to reach out best empowers people affected negatively by these incidents in reclaiming what rightfully belongs them. The sooner professional help is sought, the better chances improve concerning claim success and maximum compensation awards presented timely on merit-based grounds.

Do take advantage now by clicking below thus enabling us determine just how much worth does your case hold exactly – Your pursuit of justice well-deserved starts today with Carlson Bier leading effective recovery campaigns guaranteed targeted entirely at ensuring reinstitution prevails both inside and outside courtrooms across dynamic environments governed exclusively by Illinois jurisprudence rules embedded firmly within core ethical framework guidelines diligently adhered to by each legal practitioner representing our esteemed institute.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Berwyn Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Berwyn

Areas of Practice in Berwyn

Bicycle Incidents

Proficient in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or unsafe conditions.

Flame Damages

Supplying skilled legal support for patients of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Hospital Negligence

Providing professional legal representation for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Obligation

Managing cases involving faulty products, providing adept legal help to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Slip Occurrences

Specialist in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking justice for their losses.

Neonatal Injuries

Delivering legal help for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Collisions: Focused on supporting victims of car accidents obtain just compensation for injuries and losses.

Bike Crashes

Committed to providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Offering adept legal assistance for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for damages.

Building Accidents

Engaged in supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Cognitive Damages

Dedicated to extending compassionate legal services for patients suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Skilled in handling cases for victims who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Expert in legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Passing

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and expert legal representation to ensure restitution.

Neural Impairment

Specializing in representing patients with vertebral damage, offering expert legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer