...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Big Rock

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experience a dog bite injury in Big Rock and require legal recourse? Assets are at risk without expert representation. Enter Carlson Bier- Illinois’s renowned personal injury specialist focusing on Dog Bite Injuries! We understand your anguish, physically and emotionally. You need comprehensive legal guidance to navigate the complex process involved with extracting compensation from liable parties who have contributed to your distress directly or indirectly. Our esteemed attorneys bring vast experience at harvesting proof, identifying liability, negotiating settlements or getting you justice through courtroom trials; all aimed toward ensuring recompense for medical costs, emotional trauma, loss of income amongst others resulting from a frightening canine attack. At Carlson Bier you’re not just another case number but an individual whose rights we zealously protect while walking towards a rewarding conclusion together: A substantial settlement that alleviates monetary burdens imposed by these unfortunate incidents. Choose us as your champions when it comes to addressing dog bite-related woes in Big Rock – because nobody should face such adversity alone!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Big Rock Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that a dog bite injury can be not only physically damaging but also emotionally traumatic. Known for our proficiency in Illinois law and longstanding experience handling personal injury cases, we specialize in providing comprehensive legal support to victims of dog bite injuries. Our seasoned team of personal injury attorneys is dedicated to working relentlessly on our client’s behalf to secure just compensation.

To help educate you about your rights and potential outcomes following a dog bite incident, we’ve compiled a brief rundown of crucial points concerning this type of case. Firstly, understanding liability is critical. In several instances, the dog owner may be held responsible if their pet injures someone. However, ascertaining responsibility can sometimes prove challenging and necessitates thorough investigatory work.

Secondly, the severity of the injury often dictates the nature and amount of compensation one may receive. This covers medical bills incurred due to the initial treatment and subsequent procedures or therapy needed due to complications arising from the incident. Invisible damages such as psychological distress or an inability to return promptly to work are equally viable grounds for restitution.

Thirdly, prompt action significantly influences the success rate in claiming compensation for a dog bite victim. Fast reporting ensures evidence collection such as photographs or witness testimonials, bolstering your claim substantially and making it more robust against counter-arguments asserting that either no harm was done or claiming shared negligence on part of the victim.

Finally, employing specialized expertise proves highly beneficial while navigating complex legal landscapes surrounding such incidents. A skilled lawyer well versed with local laws can guide victims through various intricate facets including insurance claims and negotiation processes.

It’s at this junction where Carlson Bier steps in – underpinning its reputation as an accomplished Personal Injury Attorney firm trusted by countless Illinois residents over numerous decades; by delivering well-grounded advice tailored specifically around each individual scenario.

Our adeptness at strategizing methods most suitable for specific circumstances differentiates us from others – allowing us to optimize the chances of obtaining rightful compensation you are entitled to. We dedicate ourselves entirely to each client’s cause, cementing our place as compassionate advocates for those who’ve unfortunately found themselves on the receiving end of a dog bite incident.

The aftermath of a dog bite can be overwhelming and emotionally charged. Armed with extensive legal know-how and an empathetic approach, Carlson Bier is here to guide you through these choppy waters – turning daunting adversity into navigable paths towards justice.

We welcome your inquiries, whether it’s seeking initial guidance or deciding to go ahead with litigation. As part of our commitment to robust representation and high-quality service, we’re eager to demonstrate how keen understanding and command over Illinois Law can help secure optimal results in challenging cases like these.

When dealing with injury cases, time is of the essence. Every moment lost could potentially rewrite what you stand to gain legally from this unfortunate incident. Therefore, don’t hesitate; take that critical first step now in defending your rights.

In interest of providing detailed assistance tailored specifically around your circumstances—the good folks at Carlson Bier invite you click on the button below. By doing so, we swiftly kick start a comprehensive assessment aimed at determining how much worth your case holds based truly upon individual merits.

Leverage our longstanding experience and expertise in personal injury law by allowing us to champion your case—we believe every victim deserves no less than truly committed representation in their fight for justice! Click the button below right now; let’s define this journey together – aimed genuinely at ensuring that no injury remains uncompensated due under Illinois Law!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Big Rock Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Big Rock

Areas of Practice in Big Rock

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Dedicated to legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Flame Burns

Supplying specialist legal support for individuals of major burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Physician Carelessness

Ensuring professional legal representation for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Fault

Addressing cases involving faulty products, supplying skilled legal support to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Fall Incidents

Specialist in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking redress for their injuries.

Newborn Injuries

Offering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Mishaps: Dedicated to helping sufferers of car accidents obtain just remuneration for harms and destruction.

Scooter Incidents

Specializing in providing legal assistance for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

18-Wheeler Accident

Ensuring professional legal support for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for harms.

Construction Incidents

Dedicated to defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Head Traumas

Dedicated to ensuring professional legal support for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Adept at managing cases for persons who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Death

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and adept legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Spine Injury

Specializing in supporting victims with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​