...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Blandinsville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you encounter a harrowing event like a dog bite injury, your primary concern should be your immediate recovery. However, understanding and navigating the legal implications can be equally important for supporting long-term restitution. That’s where Carlson Bier excels as an experienced advocate for victims of dog bites injuries in Illinois. Spearheading your claims with their impressive track record of securing fair compensation, they focus on holding responsible parties accountable whilst maintaining strict adherence to state laws. Specializing in Dog Bite Injury law sets Carlson Bier apart – every case is met with unrivaled expertise derived from years of handling similar incidents successfully. Their unyielding commitment instills confidence in clients seeking justice post-infliction, cementing their position as a leading authority on canine confrontation cases across Illinois’ legal landscape – including delicate situations emerging from areas like Blandinsville and beyond. When entangled in intricate financial aftermaths following Fido’s fierce actions remember: Nobody advocates better than Carlson Bier! Choose them today; let us recover tomorrow together.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Blandinsville Illinois

Carlson Bier, a group of dedicated personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, possesses extensive knowledge and experience in handling cases involving dog bite injuries – an unfortunately common occurrence that can have disconcerting ramifications. Through team collaboration and thorough investigation procedures, we strive to ensure justice prevails for victims of such distressing incidents.

Dog bite injuries are not only physically painful but can also lead to psychological trauma, expensive medical bills, loss of earnings due to required time off work, and other potential complications. Often overlooked is the severity of a dog bite injury’s ability to alter one’s life significantly. In this respect:

• Dog bites might result in fractured or broken bones.

• There’s a risk of rabies transmission if the animal isn’t properly vaccinated.

• Serious infections including Pasteurella or Capnocytophaga could be contracted from a dog bite wound.

• Permanent scarring is likely because dogs have powerful jaws capable of inflicting deep wounds.

What makes Carlson Bier distinctive among personal injury law firms handling dog bite injury cases is our keen understanding of Illinois’ Animal Control Act. The act places strict liability on pet owners for damages in case their animal attacks another person without cause. This ensures protection for innocent victims who suffer harm due to an unprovoked attack by someone else’s dog.

While the responsibility often falls upon pet owners under state law, proving negligence can still prove challenging without experienced legal representation at your side. Simplifying complex legal jargon and intricacies into comprehendible information helps us maintain transparency with our clients:

• Evidence collection: Photos taken immediately after the incident capture inherent proof needed for demonstrating damage extent.

• Witness testimonies: Analysing statements from eye-witnesses supports narration consistency while adding validity to claims handed over court proceedings.

• Expert testimony: Veterinarians and behaviour analysts share insightful knowledge about perturbing behavioural patterns beforehand – strengthening case foundations.

Victims enduring bodily harm through dog bite injuries deserve prompt pursuit of justice and compensation. Carlson Bier stands by our mission to enforce accountability while upholding their rights consciously.

Within the spectrum of personal injury law, understanding your unique case situation is paramount to calculate the amount you’re liable to receive in damages fairly. A myriad components define this sum’s constitution:

• Severity of physical harm.

• Implications on professional life or earning capability.

• Amount spent on medical fees for wound recovery.

• Emotional distress endured.

Dog bite injuries are indeed traumatizing experiences with possible long-lasting impact, which underlines why it’s crucial not to fight alone. The empathetic team at Carlson Bier respects each victim’s story and stays proactive in delivering personalized attention during these challenging times – offering passionate counsel and unwavering dedication until justice has been fulfilled.

A claim evaluation remains key for understanding legal remedies available after enduring such unplanned albeit life-changing incidents. Therefore, we extend an invitation: take a leap forward towards acquiring legal assistance from experienced professionals who stand ready to advocate your rights convincingly and effectively. Don’t wait! Commence your journey back to normalcy by clicking the button below now – discover exactly what you could be entitled to as recompense for your dog-bite induced hardship imposed upon you through no fault of your own; let us at Carlson Bier help ease the path ahead, every step along the way.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Blandinsville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Blandinsville

Areas of Practice in Blandinsville

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Proficient in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Supplying adept legal support for individuals of major burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Clinical Negligence

Extending specialist legal assistance for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Obligation

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, extending professional legal services to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall & Fall Accidents

Skilled in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking redress for their damages.

Birth Traumas

Providing legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Collisions: Focused on guiding clients of car accidents obtain reasonable settlement for hurts and impairment.

Motorcycle Crashes

Focused on providing legal support for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Truck Mishap

Extending professional legal advice for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for losses.

Construction Site Crashes

Dedicated to advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Brain Damages

Dedicated to offering specialized legal representation for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Injuries

Proficient in managing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Committed to legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unjust Fatality

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and professional legal support to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Injury

Dedicated to representing individuals with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer