Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Bloomingdale

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the traumatic experience of dog bite injuries in Bloomingdale, you deserve empathetic yet dogged representation. Carlson Bier serve as trusted legal advocates for those subjected to these distressing incidents. Our team boasts an acute understanding of Illinois’ Personal Injury Law, having decades of collective litigation expertise on such matters and a proven record of achieving substantial settlements. The veteran attorneys at Carlson Bier employ their comprehensive knowledge to navigate complicated insurance disputes while ensuring clients receive rightful compensation for medical expenses, trauma, or income loss from incapacitation. Moreover, we conscientiously undertake early case evaluations resulting in robust claim preparations that bear significant influence on outcomes favoring our clientele’s interests.

We ease this challenging process through compassionate counsel coupled with litigative tenacity; forming potent strategies originating from a meticulous study of each distinctive case and unique consequences involved – thereby amplifying chances of success. Victims may confidently stand against callous insurance companies knowing they are backed by Carlson Bier’s exceptional prowess theoretically as well as practically within courtrooms; ultimately delivering justice deserved in these unfortunate scenarios.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Bloomingdale Illinois

At the distinguished law firm of Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on our specialization in handling personal injury cases. Our noteworthy expertise lies in supporting victims of dog bite injuries, an area frequently overlooked by many legal practitioners. Relying on thorough understanding of Illinois state law and superior negotiation skills honed over years of practice, our attorneys focus not only on delivering justice but providing comprehensive educational content to our clients about their rights and intricate details pertaining to this sensitive issue.

A dog bite can be a deeply traumatic event leading not just to physical pain but emotional suffering as well. Unfortunately, the aftermath often unfolds into complex circumstances entailing medical expenses, loss of income due to injury-related incapacity, and potential need for psychological counselling. However, it’s crucial to remember that you don’t have to weather this storm alone – Carlson Bier is here to help you navigate these turbulent waters.

Understanding your rights when it comes down to dog bite injuries is the first step towards seeking justice:

– In Illinois, owners are held strictly liable for their dogs’ actions irrespective of breed or previous behavior.

– Time frame for filing a claim extends up until two years post the incident.

– Potential compensation covers all medical bills and treatment cost including therapy sessions if required.

A keystone factor that might seem daunting but important is proving liability. Do note though that the prerequisite most essential isn’t showing negligence of owner but establishing ownership – something where Carlson Bier’s team could provide invaluable assistance.

Differentiating Dog Bite cases from other general Personal Injury Claims;

– Damages awarded in a typical dog bite case are often higher than standard personal injury suits owing primarily to scarring and disfigurement involved.

– With vast experience under our belt combating such complex cases at Carlson Bier provides unique know-how required for optimum result.

It has been seen time and again that insurance companies try minimising settlements while making use of complicated jargon-filled agreements leaving victims confused & under-compensated. At Carlson Bier, we understand the delicate art of negotiations and are well-versed with crafting solid strategies ensuring a just settlement for our respected clients.

When calculating the value of a dog bite case several factors come into play :

-Severity of the injury.

-Past and future medical expenses.

-Restorative surgery if required, now or in future.

-The impact on victim’s quality of life both physically and psychologically.

You will find that at Carlson Bier every case is treated with utmost attention to detail backed by extensive legal consultation & fact-based evidentiary support. Rest assured your rightful interests will be powerfully represented throughout this challenging journey.

Filing for personal injury claims can be intimidating without understanding the complexities involved but it doesn’t have to be. With seasoned expertise on your side, you would not only know what to expect but also how to handle each hurdle along the way.

On our website, we’ve simplified things further for you with an intuitive system to estimate potential worth of your claim – no commitments needed till you’re ready. This resource aims solely at equipping you better to make informed decisions about proceeding legally post a dog bite incident. If these incidents have hit closer home than it should ever have and left you wondering about what’s next – breathe easy… help isn’t far away!

Clink on ‘Find Out How Much Your Case Is Worth’ button below – let us guide you towards getting what rightfully belongs to you! Trust in Carlson Bier’s profound dedication & unrivalled commitment because when it comes down to safeguarding your rights – nothing else does justice!nThe team here at Carlson Bier understands that navigating Illinois law can feel like a daunting task—but remember: You’re not alone.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Bloomingdale Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Bloomingdale

Areas of Practice in Bloomingdale

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Specializing in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or hazardous conditions.

Fire Burns

Extending expert legal assistance for people of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Physician Malpractice

Delivering dedicated legal advice for clients affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Accountability

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, providing expert legal guidance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Fall and Tumble Injuries

Expert in managing trip accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking redress for their injuries.

Neonatal Wounds

Extending legal help for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Crashes

Incidents: Dedicated to supporting individuals of car accidents get equitable compensation for injuries and impairment.

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal services for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

18-Wheeler Accident

Offering expert legal support for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for hurts.

Building Site Accidents

Concentrated on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Neurological Damages

Focused on delivering expert legal services for clients suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Traumas

Expertise in addressing cases for people who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unjust Loss

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and adept legal representation to ensure justice.

Neural Injury

Expert in assisting victims with spine impairments, offering expert legal guidance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer