...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Bluford

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the momentary chaos that follows a dog bite incident, it’s crucial to secure proficient legal counsel. That’s where Carlson Bier enters the frame – renowned for their success in managing Dog Bite Injuries cases within Illinois. Their strong reputation is built on delivering empathetic yet determined representation for victims of dog bite injuries. They understand such experiences can be traumatizing and work tirelessly to ensure clients receive the compensation they so justly deserve.

While offering comprehensive knowledge about Illinois law specifics related to canine attacks, they boast an impressive track record of successful verdicts and settlements in this domain. Choosing Carlson Bier means choosing unwavering dedication towards defending your rights after a gruesome event like a dog attack.

Despite your location within Bluford or any other achievable city by commute within the state’s geography; one thing remains constant: outstanding commitment from Carlson Bier attorneys serving as reliable pillars throughout even most tough legal battles which are often strewn across the aftermath of these unfortunate incidents — making them an excellent consideration if you’re seeking standout representation for a Dog Bite Injuries case in Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Bluford Illinois

Understanding the legal implications and rights following a dog bite injury can be an overwhelming task. Dog bites, though seemingly innocuous, can result in severe physical and emotional trauma requiring medical attention and often long-term care. Here at Carlson Bier, we specialize in assisting victims of such unfortunate incidents navigate these complexities with a sharp focus on their individual needs.

Dog bites often lead to a cascade of consequences, ranging from painful puncture wounds to debilitating infections or devastating scars. Additionally, victims may experience post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety around dogs or generalized fear stemming from the incident. Suffice it to say that the direct and indirect impacts of these injuries make them far more serious than one might initially perceive.

• Direct costs: Medical bills for treatment immediately after the bite, including any necessary surgeries.

• Indirect costs: Subsequent need for therapy or reconstructive surgery, cost of medication, and mental health counseling if required.

• Losses incurred: Loss of work hours during treatment and recovery period; potentially loss of future income if the injuries are disabling.

But there’s good news – Victims have rights under Illinois law which provides protections for those injured by pets belonging to others. This falls under a fairly strict liability statute where dog owners become liable for any injuries caused by their pets – regardless of prior knowledge about your pet’s viciousness.

At Carlson Bier law firm based in Illinois, our seasoned personal injury attorneys thoroughly understand these statutes pertaining to dog bite claims and are committed to ensuring that individuals who suffer such misfortunes receive rightful compensation as mandated by Illinois State laws. Our team continually strives to offer professional guidance through every step of this often-complicated process so that you can focus solely on your recovery while we follow up on navigation for maximum possible compensation.

Our expertise isn’t just limited towards fighting your case aggressively but also encompasses comprehensive understanding as well as an apt analysis skills leveraged both inside as well as outside courtroom settings. We follow an empathetic and client-focused approach where open communication is at the core of our relationship building strategy, meaning your well-being and best interests are our utmost priority.

• Previous Case Success: Our track-record speaks for itself; we’ve successfully represented a number of victims in similar situations.

• Exceptional Communication: We’ll keep you properly updated about all proceedings related to your case while also offering effective legal & procedural advice as needed.

• Contingency Based Fees: You owe us nothing until we win your case, ensuring that you can prioritize your resources on recovery rather than worrying about legal fees.

Receiving fair compensation following a dog bite injury requires experienced legal representation. At Carlson Bier, we believe that no victim should face their pain alone or untreated due to monetary constraints. That’s why it’s integral to us that each client receives the justice they deserve – healing physically and mentally without financial stress feeding into those wounded emotions. If you or a loved one has suffered from a non-fault dog bite injury, remember that professional help is just a click away to find out how much your case could potentially be worth—with absolutely no obligation from you unless we win.

So don’t wait! Start your journey towards rightful compensation by understanding what kind of settlement might be possible in accordance with Illinois law standards. Our expert attorneys are ready to provide personal attention and guidance through this complex process—Feel confident in clicking the button below to reach out for an evaluation completely free-of-charge because here at Carlson Bier, success in assisting clients reclaim their peace of mind post-injury isn’t just our practice—it’s our passion.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Bluford Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Bluford

Areas of Practice in Bluford

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Burns

Supplying professional legal services for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Ensuring dedicated legal assistance for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, offering adept legal help to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Neglect

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Stumble Occurrences

Professional in handling trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking justice for their injuries.

Neonatal Traumas

Supplying legal assistance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Accidents

Incidents: Concentrated on guiding individuals of car accidents secure appropriate remuneration for damages and impairment.

Scooter Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal support for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

18-Wheeler Accident

Delivering expert legal assistance for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for damages.

Building Collisions

Dedicated to advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Neurological Impairments

Focused on ensuring expert legal representation for clients suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Harms

Skilled in managing cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Specializing in legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Undeserved Demise

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and adept legal services to ensure justice.

Backbone Injury

Committed to defending victims with spine impairments, offering expert legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​