FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Bluford

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to Slip And Fall Accidents, Carlson Bier stands as a beacon of trust and professional integrity. This esteemed personal injury law firm represents clients dealing with these unfortunate situations effectively. Their attorneys are committed to delivering excellent legal service by meticulously investigating your case, providing informed consultation, and building a robust defense strategy in court if necessary. With years of experience in handling Slip And Fall cases statewide including Bluford, they comprehend the intricacies involved at both local and state levels which gives them an edge during negotiations or trial proceedings. They create personalized strategies for each client while ensuring the legal process is seamlessly navigated from inception to completion thereby maximising possible compensation benefits you’re entitled to receive under Illinois law. Opting for Carlson Bier enhances your journey towards justice, their expertise turns stumbling blocks into stepping stones towards rightful compensation after such mishaps occur.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Bluford Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on our commitment to obtaining just and fair compensation for clients who have suffered injuries from slip and fall accidents. Enmeshed in the bustling state of Illinois, our reputable personal injury attorneys firmly believe that no one should bear the burden of an accident that was not their fault. We leverage our vast knowledge, experience, and aggressive litigation skills to yield successful outcomes in the challenging realm of personal injury law.

Understanding what constitutes a slip and fall case forms the cornerstone of assessing where you stand legally after sustaining an injury on another person’s property due to negligence. A slip and fall incident is essentially any situation where you slip or trip over something which directly causes harm to you. This could be an uneven piece of sidewalk, spilled liquids in a grocery aisle, ice left untreated during winter months–any hazardous condition that leads to physical injuries.

Key aspects we typically consider when handling such cases are:

• The liability—was there negligence on part of the property owner or manager?

• The nature and extent of your injuries.

• Evidence available related to your accident.

While these points lay down a simplified understanding of what a typical case involves; real-life applications can often become more convoluted demanding professional expertise to navigate through successfully.

Compensations generally cover not just medical expenses but also lost wages owing to healing time off work, pain suffering caused by physical anguish both immediately following the accident as well as long-term effects resulting therefrom. As trained professionals with years upon years accumulated court-room exposure under our belt here at Carlson Bier – your rights are always protected while aiming towards maximizing potential recovering amount rendering justice for fallout victims who’ve been wrongly injured out- without taking slice out financial burdens dominating today’s world.

Evaluating these matters necessitates meticulous scrutiny and thorough preparation; cornerstones of Carlson Bier’s approach towards every case we handle. Our skilled attorneys invest themselves in digging into every pertinent detail about your case which go beyond ascertaining simply what happened. Proving negligence on part of the property owners demands connecting daunting dots while punctuating with applicable laws – a feat we’ve successfully achieved over time and again for clients.

It’s essential to note that Illinois operates under a modified comparative fault rule in personal injury cases, including slip and fall accidents. This means if you are found to be responsible for only a portion of the accident, you can still collect damages but reduced by your percentage at fault against total award amount. For instance- if awarded $100,000 but were 25% liable- then take home reduction would equal $75,000 instead (less quarter representing faulty behemoth).

Moreover, there’s statute limitations law restricting period when litigation can commence post-incident; hence critical acting fast upon realization needing legal help – another reason getting touch experienced professionals like ours firm becomes essential.

Finally, Let Carlson Bier unburden you from this tumultuous journey riddled with complex labyrinth of rules and regulations towards securing deserved reparations after such unfortunate incidents because no one should stand alone in seeking justice after sustaining personal injuries due to someone else’s oversight or negligence.

We encourage you to make use of our state-of-the-art assessment tool available right below this page—a comprehensive yet simple questionnaire designed to compute tentative estimate regarding how much potentially entitled compensation might amount up-to provided circumstances surrounding incident were reviewed by one our adept Illinois-based attorneys undertaking similar cases on daily basis across entire area—obviously extending well past fictional city called Bluford!

So before waste any more precious healing time stressing over cumbersome paperwork checklists involved kickstarting civil lawsuits amidst rising tensions easily managed interference esteemed team highly efficient lawyers–click button now see much potentially worth!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Bluford Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Bluford

Areas of Practice in Bluford

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Focused on legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Damages

Giving professional legal help for victims of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Healthcare Incompetence

Offering dedicated legal assistance for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Fault

Managing cases involving problematic products, delivering adept legal help to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Abuse

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Tumble Injuries

Specialist in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking restitution for their suffering.

Infant Harms

Offering legal assistance for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Collisions: Focused on assisting clients of car accidents secure equitable settlement for hurts and destruction.

Scooter Accidents

Specializing in providing legal assistance for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Trucking Incident

Offering professional legal representation for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for hurts.

Construction Mishaps

Engaged in defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cerebral Harms

Focused on providing specialized legal support for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Damages

Proficient in addressing cases for persons who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Collisions

Expert in legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Demise

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and professional legal support to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Damage

Specializing in assisting clients with paralysis, offering professional legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​