...

Bicycle Accidents in Bradford

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one are involved in a bicycle accident, securing the right legal representation is crucial. This is where Carlson Bier enters the picture; unwavering champions of victims’ rights with unparalleled commitment and expertise in Bicycle Accident cases. We understand that cycling accidents can be particularly devastating, owing to the vulnerability of cyclists on our roads. That’s why we offer assertive yet compassionate representation aimed at pursuing justice for injured clients in Bradford and beyond. Our team possesses an intimate knowledge of Illinois law regarding cyclist protection which when coupled with our litigation prowess results into formidable legal defense against those responsible for your injuries. With an impressive track record under our belt, choosing Carlson Bier affirms your need for professional help that goes above simply winning cases – we advocate tirelessly until justice prevails. Don’t delay! Let us discuss how best we may advance your interests following such traumatic experiences as bicycle accidents.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Bradford Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the emotional, physical, and financial toll a bicycle accident can impose on your life. Being based in Illinois places us at the heart of an established biking community where unfortunately cycling mishaps occur all too often. As personal injury attorneys specializing in bicycle accidents, our goal is to provide you with essential information and valuable guidance about the legalities surrounding these cases.

Firstly, it’s crucial for cyclers to comprehend that they possess similar rights as automotive drivers on the road. Bicycle riders are bestowed with the entitlements to use both traffic lanes and bike lanes according to Illinois law. In contrast lies obligations that include obeying traffic regulations such as signals or markings, among others.

Understanding liability in a bicycle accident is vital as it directly influences compensation eligibility. If proven that another party was negligent thus causing an accident- be it drivers’ recklessness, poorly maintained roads or flawed equipment- you have grounds for injury claims validation.

Instances of negligence could involve actions like speeding or texting while driving by motorists; potholes that local authorities should have fixed; manufacturing defects attributable toward your cycle manufacturer or supplier among others. Our competent team will dissect all plausible angles ensuring no stone gets left unturned aiming towards securing maximum compensation due you.

However, establishing one’s innocence isn’t straightforward though imperative since judges apply ‘comparative fault’ principles under Illinois jurisprudence when adjudicating bicycle – vehicle -accident causality cases. This principle endows them clearance toward reducing compensation proportionally correlating with your contributory negligence if any. Our adeptness herein emanates from extensive experience bestowing us adept skills indispensable at proving clients’ non-liability thereby upholding rightful compensations awards.

Accordingly, experts recommend seeking immediate legal counsel following a mishap to collect evidence effectively thereby strengthening case credibility significantly when well-documented facts back claim assertions ideally mediated by reliable attorney advisory usherance provided at Carlson Bier.

The aftermath of an accident can be tumultuous – dealing with physical pain, convalescing amid escalating medical expenses all exacerbated by loss of income debilitating. At Carlson Bier, a silver lining awaits you through our much-needed legal assistance. We value your recovery above everything else which underlines our commitment to relinquishing worry off your shoulders facilitating psychological healing conducive for speedy physical recovery.

Further key to note is that statute of limitations stipulates a limited time frame within which bicycle-related claims should get filed- normally two years from incident occurrence date or discovery in Illinois. Act promptly guided by our team eliminating unnecessary court rejections attributable to delays degrading otherwise potent cases.

Being personally injured as one attempts commuting on the city’s bustling streets is unsettling enough without having to navigate intricate laws and regulations single-handedly. Carlson Bier positions itself as the advocate ready to stride with you every step of the process-relieving complexities synonymous with such legal encounters ensuring curtailing distress levels indispensably aiding recovery-maintaining crystal clear communication throughout- seeking justice emphatically aversively toward settlements less deserving than whole rightful compensation due.

Take action today and access expert information tailored specifically for your situation. Discover how Carlson Bier’s consummate skills translate into crucial settlements boosting odds unattainably singlehandedly through clicking on the link below- offering insights revealing possible case valuation owing-due-process facilitated respectively here at Carlson Bier pledging solid standings steadfastly ever-committed towards clients’ pursuit gratification worth met rightfully promising while wrapped diligently cost-effectiveness conscious measures warranting needing assurance-seeking bikers that distinguishing us from competitors promises rewarding outcomes only justifying the very best.

Uncover what your case could be worth -engage pros at Carlsons Beir proffering valuable guidance set footing await navigations made easy covering cycling coverage specified preferences channelled justifiably rightly so.

Our experts are always ready to lend keen ears preceded by responsive actions that affirm our commitment to serving you. With one click on the button below, let Carlson Bier help you determine how much your case is worth and guide you towards a fair settlement or verdict.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Bradford Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Bradford

Areas of Practice in Bradford

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Focused on legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Wounds

Providing expert legal help for patients of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Clinical Incompetence

Ensuring specialist legal support for persons affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Fault

Handling cases involving unsafe products, offering professional legal guidance to customers affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Slip Mishaps

Skilled in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking restitution for their suffering.

Childbirth Injuries

Providing legal guidance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Incidents: Dedicated to helping victims of car accidents get appropriate recompense for injuries and harm.

Motorcycle Crashes

Committed to providing representation for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

Trucking Collision

Offering experienced legal support for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for injuries.

Construction Site Collisions

Focused on advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Cognitive Traumas

Specializing in delivering expert legal advice for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Wounds

Expertise in managing cases for clients who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Committed to legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Fatality

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and experienced legal representation to ensure justice.

Vertebral Trauma

Committed to assisting persons with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal representation to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer