FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Bradley

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When the unforeseen happens, such as enduring a dog bite injury in Bradley, you need competent representation to navigate through the legal complexities. Look no further than Carlson Bier—their mastery of Dog Bite Injuries law positions them strategically to advocate fiercely for your rights. This esteemed Illinois-based law firm carries an unrivaled reputation owing to their deep dedication and relentless drive towards seeking justice for those dealing with personal injuries. Their proficiency uniquely equips them with insights on Illinois’ intricate laws regarding dog bites thus ensuring maximum compensation for their clients’ pain and suffering. One can hardly ignore the glowing testimonials pouring forth from satisfied clients who have experienced first-hand how splendidly this team negotiates desirable resolutions amidst distressing circumstances. Stakeholder relationships are key here; expect nothing short of warmth, empathy, transparency – hallmarks that stand integral to good lawyering at Carlson Bier—an undoubtedly sound choice when considering counsel following a dog bite incident within Bradley’s vicinity or beyond its geographical confines.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Bradley Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are renowned leaders in the arena of personal injury law. Our specialty lies in representing victims of various accidents, including those suffering from Dog Bite Injuries – a complex yet prevalent subset of personal injury cases unique to Illinois.

When a dog attacks or bites an individual, it’s more than just physical injuries they sustain. Such incidents embody acute emotional trauma that could plunge multiple lives into disarray. At our esteemed Carlson Bier firm, located right here in Illinois, we possess matured expertise in handling these sensitive cases.

Several facets constitute the intricate premise of Dog Bite Injuries and its subsequent lawful proceedings. Educating yourself about key elements can aid you immensely in comprehending your situation and deciding on legal recourse.

• Severity of Injury: If a dog bite has led to severe harm like bone fractures, nerve damage or long-lasting scars, it substantially strengthens your case.

• Liability Examination: Establishing ownership of the dog is pivotal before proceeding with any claim.

• Notion of Provocation: Did the injured person provoke the attack? If so, this may drastically impact their compensation rewards.

• Statute Of Limitations: A lawsuit for Dog Bite Injuries must be filed within two years from your injury date under Illinois law.

Demystifying these aspects may help you grasp crucial context necessary while pursuing legal action. Moreover, understanding how these factors interplay enables you to gauge the potentiality contained within your particular circumstances better.

Comprehending legalese or figuring out if you have a valid claim can often become overwhelming without professional assistance – which brings us to why choosing an experienced attorney matters significantly. With expert representation like Carlson Bier by your side furnishing high-quality guidance and assistance every step along the way – anxiety can historically turn into assurance.

At our distinguished law firm headquartered right here in Illinois – not Bradley – we transcend typical legal boundaries through unparalleled dedicated service boasting timely driven results made achievable by our deeply ingrained firm-wide ethos. Our unwavering commitment to protecting clients’ rights, combined with impeccable legal strategies perfected over years of practice in the arena of Dog Bite Injuries litigation, has cemented us as formidable influencers within this robust field.

Fighting for your rightful compensation in a Dog Bite Injury case should not feel like having another tooth being pulled out– it should be about understanding, empathizing and alleviating your pains while simultaneously seeking judicial equity on your behalf. We believe tirelessly advocating for these justice-serving notions forms an integral part of being personal injury lawyers.

As you browse through informative content relevant to the sensitive subject matter Dog Bites Injuries right here on our website – we invite you to take a moment acknowledging the stark value it brings into comprehending your current predicament’s depth while arming yourself better when faced with such unfortunate occurrences.

Having shared considerable knowledge elements associated with these distinct cases – remember that no article could ever offer comprehensive guidance compared to speaking directly with one of our expert attorneys. Each dog bite case is unique; hence personalized advice from seasoned professionals remains indispensable across all circumstances.

At Carlson Bier, measuring success isn’t merely about winning lawsuits – rather ensuring each client feels understood, revered and adequately represented at every juncture from beginning till end.

Allow us to patiently stand by you, relentlessly fight for your rights while leveraging our respected legal proficiency towards attaining substantial compensations commensurate with damages sustained by innocent victims of Dog Bite Injuries. Thanks entirely owing down to esteemed clients such as yourselves – honoring invaluable trust placed within us continuously fuels higher standards borne service commitment pledged by Carlson Bier daily.

More poised now than perhaps before pursuing restitution rights post adversity? Keenly interested in discovering potential claim worthiness? Encouraged heartily now more than ever rightly knowing that someone’s there dedicated solely towards serving personal interests?

Consider clicking on the button below – let expert counselors at Carlson Bier provide rightful clarity about claim suitability related to your unique circumstances. Your just dog bite compensation could be merely a click away – mooted forward by none other than Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law firm headquartered in Illinois, always on your side.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Bradley Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Bradley

Areas of Practice in Bradley

Bike Accidents

Specializing in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Flame Injuries

Supplying skilled legal assistance for people of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Hospital Incompetence

Extending expert legal services for victims affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Fault

Managing cases involving faulty products, offering specialist legal assistance to victims affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Abuse

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Trip Occurrences

Skilled in managing trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking compensation for their damages.

Newborn Harms

Supplying legal guidance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Mishaps: Devoted to supporting clients of car accidents obtain just compensation for wounds and losses.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Dedicated to providing representation for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Big Rig Crash

Ensuring experienced legal services for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for hurts.

Construction Site Collisions

Concentrated on defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Neurological Traumas

Focused on offering professional legal representation for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Expertise in managing cases for victims who have suffered harms from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Committed to legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unjust Fatality

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and skilled legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spine Injury

Focused on assisting victims with paralysis, offering specialized legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​