Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Breese

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a dog bite injury, having the right legal representation to confidently navigate through this strenuous experience is crucial. Carlson Bier’s expertise, widely recognized in Illinois for their unrivaled commitment and dedication to their clients, sets them apart as your optimal choice. Their prominence in handling Dog Bite Injuries cases extends across geographical boundaries and consistently resonates even within communities such as Breese. Attorneys at Carlson Bier understand the intricacies of Illinois law relating to animal injuries profoundly well; hence they are well-equipped to pursue justice while upholding your rights diligently throughout every step of the litigation process or negotiation table. There’s no substitute for top-tier legal assistance when dealing with an unsettling event like a dog bite injury – that’s what you get when choosing Carlson Bier: trusted professionals who genuinely prioritize your interests above all else, dedicatedly seeking fair compensation to ensure recovery doesn’t become another burden on you.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Breese Illinois

At the esteemed law firm of Carlson Bier, our personal injury attorneys are committed to providing comprehensive legal representation for individuals who have suffered from dog bite incidents in Illinois. We stand ready to offer expert advice and guide victims through a notoriously complex legal process, making it as straightforward and understandable as possible.

As trusted personal injury lawyers, we’ve put together concrete insights on dog bite injuries that aim to emphasize their vital importance. Dog bites can cause serious physical damage ranging from minor scratches and puncture wounds to severe lacerations and traumatic tissue loss. As non-trivial as this physical trauma might be, emotional distress often accompanies such incidents which must be duly considered when seeking compensation.

We believe that state specific information empowers victims of dog bite cases considerably. Illinois follows what is termed a ‘strict liability’ rule concerning animal harm. This implies that an owner is held accountable for injuries caused by their pets regardless of whether they were aware or unaware of the animal’s dangerous propensity prior to the incident.

Several key points warrant highlighting within this scope:

• For strict liability rules to apply in your case, you need sufficient proof revealing you were behaving peacefully around the dog before it bit you.

• Showing that there was no provocation on your part is equally paramount which includes not trying to commit a crime at the pet owner’s property at the time.

• A landlord may also be liable for tenants’ dogs if prior knowledge or foreseeability about their aggressive nature existed.

It’s crucial not only to comprehend these regulations but also understand how they might affect your potential claim efficiently once lodged correctly. With Carlson Bier representing you, rest assured knowing we’ll meticulously build up your case putting each aspect into perspective ensuring optimal results are generated every step of the way – all within Illinois’ statute limitations bound by a reasonable timeframe following any suchinstances.

Navigating financial considerations related to medical treatment could be uncharted waters for many victims post-incident. We make it our mission to establish a web of support during such times, tackling costly medical bills and identifying economic impacts relevant. Victims might be eligible for compensation against medical costs incurred, lost earnings due to absence from work, psychological trauma treatment expenses and even non-economic damages affiliated to pain or suffering.

Just as empathy is pivotal in our industry, Carlson Bier’s ethos encompasses positioning clients’ needs first each step along the journey seeking justice. Our relentless dedication lies not only in successfully securing maximum payouts but also in creating a judgement-free environment making victims feel comfortable enough to freely voice their concerns while proceeding with legal channels.

We extend our services beyond simply representing you – having ties with a bevy of accredited physicians and counsellors enables us to connect you directly with professionals who can help overcome physical wounds or emotional stress that are part-and-parcel of these incidents. A multi-faceted approach is often key into easing out the trials dog bite victims face by considering both legal and health-related aspects effectively whilst taking action.

Finally, looking past traditional contingency fee packages that law firms typically offer we embrace a client-first mentality providing affordable yet quality service garnering no charge till victory prevails in your favor. No claims fall too big or small for our consideration – so why wait any longer? Take the first stride joining forces with Carlson Bier today by using this opportunity to understand comprehensively what your case could entitle you towards – click on the button below for an immediate assessment quantifying your potential claim value without obligation! It has never been easier to prioritize your welfare just as importantly as we do here at Carlson Bier – where every case matters heavily regardless their degree.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Breese Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Breese

Areas of Practice in Breese

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Expert in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Flame Damages

Offering skilled legal assistance for people of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Medical Negligence

Offering professional legal representation for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Accountability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, supplying professional legal guidance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Elder Neglect

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Fall and Fall Accidents

Specialist in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking restitution for their losses.

Infant Wounds

Delivering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Accidents: Dedicated to helping victims of car accidents obtain just compensation for harms and harm.

Scooter Accidents

Specializing in providing legal services for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Semi Crash

Providing adept legal assistance for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for damages.

Worksite Incidents

Focused on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Dedicated to offering compassionate legal services for victims suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Damages

Proficient in managing cases for victims who have suffered traumas from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Crashes

Dedicated to legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Demise

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and expert legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Trauma

Committed to representing clients with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer