Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Brookfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the aftermath of a slip and fall accident in Brookfield, having the right legal representation is crucial. It ensures that your rights are protected as you seek compensation for damages and losses incurred. That’s where Carlson Bier enters the picture – renowned throughout Illinois for their expertise, approachability, and commitment to achieving maximum results for personal injury cases of this nature. Their formidable team comprises a wealth of experienced attorneys who understand intimately how to navigate not just complex law scenarios but also efficiently liaise with insurers on your behalf. So why choose Carlson Bier? Unlike many other firms in this arena, they offer personalized attention fueled by an unwavering commitment toward advocating for their clients’ best interests – ensuring every case gets its due diligence without compromise on quality time spent per client.Committed to serving those affected by slip and fall accidents across Brookfield despite being headquartered elsewhere; they remain consistent champions against injustice—always striving towards justice victory.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Brookfield Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we distinctly understand that being in a slip and fall accident can permanently alter your life. As premier personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our chief aim is dedicated to not only seeking justice for our clients but also providing educational content to help clarify the implications of such accidents. A slip and fall accident typically occurs when an individual unexpectedly slips or trips on premises due to hazardous conditions which could range from wet floors, uneven surfaces, poor lighting or even icy patches.

In reality, these merely represent a fragment of the multiple scenarios one may encounter. Given the varying circumstances surrounding such incidents, it stands crucial for potential victims to discern when they would be eligible for compensation following an encounter with a slip and fall occurrence.

• To begin with, for legal purposes ‘fault’ lies at the heart of such incidents. This pertains not to negligence by the victim but rather inadequate attention towards property upkeep by its responsible entity.

• Secondly, while minor bruises or scrapes may not constitute as significant injury enough for filing a claim – fractures, head injuries or any considerable medical implication certainly will.

• Lastly, timing is essential since Illinois law stipulates that personal injury claims need to be filed within two years of experiencing said incident.

We hope this knowledge renders you better equipped if-or ever you are faced with such unfortunate circumstances. Yet if these complex issues amplify your questions instead of addressing them – then who better than an experienced squad from Carlson Bier? We are committed productively complementing detailed statistics & professional insight acquired over years.

Should you find yourself grappling between gauging the extent of liability after encountering such incidents; how much should you settle for in damages or determining if more than one party concurs fault in your situation– allow us to alleviate your burden hand-in-hand making sure each concern is addressed exhaustively down to intricate detail befitting brains behind countless success stories.

Our adept team integrates strategic approach together with unwavering dedication toward providing seamless service, ensuring every client secures their deserved compensation. By incorporating unmatched proficiency in tackling multifaceted issues alongside relentless pursuit of justice – a brighter future emerges for victims of slip and fall accidents.

Sometimes, understanding the law can be a bit complicated especially when recovering from an accident. But with us at Carlson Bier on your side explaining each element until it all makes sense will lead to not only acknowledgment but ultimately pave way towards any deserved claim that might be pending.

At Carlson Bier, we are positioned to extend comprehensive support while willingly extending our time and services through huddle sessions or advice as essentially required. This isn’t about ushering forth another legal contract rather symbolizes nurturing a partnership embarking towards shared success together standing as solid semblance to our years of beheld promise.

We believe passionately that you deserve justice after suffering from a slip and fall accident because nobody should have to feel cornered or overwhelmed by such unfortunate circumstances hence why we invite you to click on the button below; let’s discover exactly how much your case is worth! It is in moments like these where seasoned vigilance backed with stalwart conviction unriddles complexities building a robust legroom tossing aside short-term deal instead culminating into lasting bonds built over trust & respect.

Let us honorably steer your course toward rectifying any past wrongs making sure that even within misspent moments – hope continues shining upon resilient hearts strong enough to welcome better days aligned ahead.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Brookfield Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Brookfield

Areas of Practice in Brookfield

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Focused on legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Providing professional legal support for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Physician Incompetence

Ensuring expert legal services for victims affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Accountability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, offering specialist legal services to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Tumble Occurrences

Expert in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking restitution for their losses.

Infant Wounds

Delivering legal help for households affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Crashes

Accidents: Focused on guiding patients of car accidents secure fair payout for injuries and damages.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Dedicated to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Trucking Incident

Extending expert legal representation for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for damages.

Construction Site Incidents

Committed to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Committed to extending compassionate legal support for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Expertise in addressing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Focused on legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Fatality

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and professional legal guidance to ensure redress.

Neural Damage

Specializing in representing clients with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer