FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Brownstown

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

As the foremost authority on Pedestrian Accident matters, Carlson Bier is well-positioned to serve those in Brownstown navigating personal injury lawsuits. Our team of legal professionals specializes in Pedestrian Accident cases, striving for justice on behalf of our clients. Understanding fully how impactful these incidents can be on one’s life, Carlson Bier has made it its mission to address the individual needs of every client with utmost care and precision. Our extensive track record showcases a history of successful resolutions, making us a top consideration when seeking out representation for your Pedestrian Accident case regardless where you are based or where you live. We employ tactical expertise alongside empathy and insight to ensure that each person we represent feels heard and rightfully advocated for throughout their litigation journey with us. At Carlson Bier, we promise dedicated service tailored specifically towards Achieving optimum results within pedestrian accident litigation parameters; tangibly demonstrating why choosing us would invariably mean entrusting your case into seasoned hands committed wholly to achieving what best serves your interest.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Brownstown Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we’re dedicated to securing your rights and representing your interests in the face of pedestrian accidents. Located at the heart of Illinois, our team of experienced personal injury attorneys understand that accidents can be sudden and life-changing events, often leaving innocent victims burdened with distressing physical injuries, mounting medical expenses, property damage or wage loss.

Pedestrians have as much right to use the roads as motorists, if not more. However, they’re exponentially more vulnerable when it comes to traffic accidents. Lacking physical protection offered by vehicles, pedestrians are exposed to serious risks posed by negligent or reckless drivers. From crosswalk violations and speeding incidents to distracted driving or impaired judgement due to drug/alcohol abuse – there’s a long list of circumstances where drivers bear responsibility for inflicting harm onto unsuspecting pedestrians.

Contributing factors in most pedestrian accident cases include but aren’t limited to:

• Driver distraction: Texting behind the wheel is a common cause.

• Failure to yield before turning: This error can prove especially dangerous while crossing intersections.

• Ignoring traffic signals: When drivers run red lights or ignore stop signs.

• Impaired Driving: Inability caused by alcohol consumption/drug use increases likelihood of catastrophic errors.

In these challenging times post-accident survivor’s primary focus should remain on recovery rather than legal intricacies which could be overwhelming for individuals lacking legal expertise. That’s where our team steps in – relentlessly working towards recouping medical costs and compensation for lost wages; pursuing damages inflicted under ‘pain & suffering’ parameter including psychological trauma endured due to mental anguish – an aspect often overlooked in insurance settlements; ensuring those accountable for the mishap are held responsible irrespective of their insurance statuses.

We believe every victim deserves justice regardless of social standing or financial capacity which is precisely why we work on a contingency fee basis i.e., you don’t pay till we win! With Carlson Bier, you can rest easy knowing that someone knowledgeable is advocating for your rights. Providing you the peace of mind while we relentlessly strive to build a strong case and pursue fair compensation on your behalf.

Remember – report accidents without delay; gather concrete evidence if possible, such as capturing photographs of accident site or noting down important details – these facts play crucial role in building substantial cases. Physicians’ narratives could provide legitimacy to the severity of injuries hence, keep documenting medical visits accurately from start till end. Last but not least – NEVER automatically admit fault at an accident scene instead seek legal advice promptly.

A pedestrian accident doesn’t have to ruin your life or push you into financial disarray. With appropriate legal representation by Carlson Bier’s adept attorneys, it’s possible to secure the just recompense you deserve thereby allowing you to shift focus onto what matters most—your recovery.

Just like every human being is unique so are each pedestrian-accident claims; they vary based on individual circumstances demanding customized tactics revolving around core principles of law. Which is why before reaching out for any settlement options with insurance adjusters commit some time towards consulting a personal injury lawyer thereby ensuring your interests’ protection alongside gaining critical insights about potential outcomes regarding claim settlements.

– Overwhelmed? Don’t be! Connect immediately with our esteemed representative through clicking on the adjoining button thereby understanding the true worthiness of your case in-depth and feel confident prior taking next steps towards your road to justice.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Brownstown Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Brownstown

Areas of Practice in Brownstown

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Expert in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Flame Wounds

Supplying adept legal help for people of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Offering professional legal services for patients affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Accountability

Handling cases involving defective products, providing skilled legal support to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Neglect

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Stumble Occurrences

Skilled in managing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking justice for their damages.

Childbirth Harms

Extending legal help for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Collisions

Incidents: Focused on guiding victims of car accidents obtain fair payout for wounds and impairment.

Scooter Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Semi Collision

Providing expert legal services for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for losses.

Building Site Mishaps

Dedicated to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Head Harms

Focused on offering specialized legal support for individuals suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Proficient in handling cases for clients who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Specializing in legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Fatality

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and expert legal support to ensure redress.

Neural Trauma

Focused on assisting victims with paralysis, offering dedicated legal services to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​