...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Bicycle Accidents in Buckley

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When bicycle accidents occur in Buckley, Carlson Bier is the most trusted law firm to turn to. We specialize in ensuring justice for affected cyclists who might be facing issues ranging from recovering damages to navigating legal hurdles. Our experienced attorneys are well-versed with the nuances of bicycle accident laws and intricacies specific to Illinois state legislation. We strive to provide diligent representation dedicated towards achieving favorable outcomes for our clients because we understand the significant impact that a bicycle accident can have on your life – emotionally, physically, and financially. What sets us apart at Carlson Bier is our detail-oriented approach tailored around offering personalized solutions while empathizing with each client’s unique situation following a distressful event such as a bike collision.We commit ourselves relentlessly until justice is served! It’s not about where we are; it’s about where you need us – reassuring legal counsel delivered professionally by Carlson Bier!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Buckley Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the emotional and physical toll of a bicycle accident in Illinois. As a dedicated personal injury law firm, our goal is not only to offer legal guidance but also deliver information that can help prevent accidents and enhance your understanding of existing laws. This valuable knowledge can provide comfort during uncertain times or even when trying to decipher complicated legal jargon.

Bicycle accidents, unfortunately, are common occurrences and often result due to the negligence of other road users. This includes reckless driving by motorists, lack of proper signage on roads or construction sites, flawed road designs or conditions such as potholes—factors often overlooked until an accident occurs. Equally notable is the fact that Illinois doesn’t have a helmet law for bicyclists older than 16 years old which puts at-risk bicyclists amidst vehicular traffic without any form of protective gear.

It’s important to realize what steps one must take immediately after a bicycle accident:

• Contacting authorities right away: So there’s an official record about the incident.

• Documenting everything you remember about the circumstances leading up to the crash.

• Seeking immediate medical assistance: Not all injuries reveal themselves instantly; swift action aids diagnosis.

Understanding what quantifies as negligence is another crucial aspect involved in these unfortunate incidents. A driver who fails to adhere to traffic rules or shows disregard towards bicyclists could be deemed negligent.

At this juncture, let us make it clear- If someone else’s recklessness has caused your accident & resultant injuries, then under Illinois Personal Injury Laws—You do have rights!

We’ve realized over time that insurance companies would rather resolve matters quickly and inexpensively rather than addressing genuine concerns about medical costs & recovery which could include prolonged hospital stays, rehabilitation therapy sessions or even certain lifestyle changes required post-accident.

Illinois follows comparative fault principles wherein if you’re found partially respsonsible for the accident – any damages awarded would be reduced by your percentage of fault. Let’s say, for instance, if you’re determined to be 20% at fault and damages awarded is $100,000 – You would only receive $80,000 after the 20% deduction. However, being assigned blame doesn’t mean you are entirely ineligible or should hesitate from making a claim.

We’re here to make sure you’re treated fairly when it comes to compensation & that your rights are staunchly defended where they need to be.

Our experienced attorneys can assist in many ways from ensuring all accident-related aspects have been considered during evaluation irrespective of whether its lost wages, future medical costs or pain and suffering; all destined towards making an irreproachable case in front of insurance companies and jurors alike.

Further ahead, remember that Illinois has a two-year statute of limitations which means one needs to file their lawsuit within two years following the date of the accident lest face potential dismissal owing to tardiness.

Bringing forth defiant facts about how laws shape outcomes with regards to bicycle accidents should paint a clearer picture – what we haven’t dwelt upon so far are individual cases that each bring personal stories and unshared struggles.We believe those deserve equal attention too.

Whether envisioning safety precautions as regular bicyclists or seeking justice post an accident—Knowledge empowers us! Therefore, Reach out today involving a qualified attorney on your side can drastically improve chances of receiving maximum possible compensation for injuries sustained!

You might just be surprised when you discover what fair recompense entails under the law that considers not just visible wounds but all facets disrupted because life decided conjure an unforeseen event–One minute on a bike ride; Next dealing with life-altered realities!

Before bolting down these pages–Click on the button below now! Seeking aid isn’t limited by conceding weakness but represents recognition about value—Hint: Far greater than mere numbers thrown around courtrooms…

Why not gauge…How much is your case worth? Click below and take the first step towards rightful compensation—A sure stride on path to recovery & justice!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Buckley Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Buckley

Areas of Practice in Buckley

Bicycle Collisions

Expert in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Burn Wounds

Supplying specialist legal support for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Medical Negligence

Providing professional legal assistance for persons affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Fault

Managing cases involving dangerous products, extending expert legal support to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Mistreatment

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Fall Accidents

Skilled in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking redress for their suffering.

Birth Harms

Extending legal guidance for families affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Incidents: Concentrated on guiding victims of car accidents secure reasonable compensation for wounds and destruction.

Scooter Crashes

Specializing in providing legal support for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Semi Crash

Providing adept legal representation for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for harms.

Building Collisions

Concentrated on representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Expert in delivering dedicated legal services for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Wounds

Expertise in managing cases for people who have suffered traumas from dog bites or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Expert in legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Passing

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and adept legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Damage

Dedicated to assisting victims with spine impairments, offering specialized legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​