...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Buda

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re the victim of a dog bite injury in Buda, securing experienced legal representation is essential for your path to recovery. Carlson Bier stands out among law firms dealing with such cases due to their exceptional knowledge and understanding of Illinois’ complex personal injury laws. Their attorneys have years of experience handling dog bite injuries specifically, providing clients not only with strong advocacy but also empathic support during challenging times. They are adept at establishing fault, accurately valuing injuries and relentlessly pursuing the compensation that victims deserve. While some might think any personal injury attorney can manage a dog bite case effectively – they often overlook crucial nuances specific to these types of injuries claims where dedicated expertise truly makes a difference. What sets Carlson Bier apart is the ability to aggressively fight for your rights while seamlessly navigating state-specific regulations on your behalf, making them an invaluable resource when overcoming such traumatic experiences in Buda.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Buda Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury laws and understand that for victims, an incident involving a dog bite can be terrifying, emotionally distressing, and physically injurious. Our Illinois-based law firm is seasoned in all aspects of representing individuals who have suffered due to dog bite injuries. We believe knowledge empowers our clients hence we strive to provide the most valuable educational content about Dog Bite Injuries.

Understanding Dog Bite laws in Illinois requires familiarity with primary areas like liability and statute of limitations. Owners of dogs are typically held liable for any injury or damages caused by their pets under the ‘strict liability’ rule applied within our state. This means it’s not necessary for victims to show evidence that the owner was aware of the animal’s aggressiveness or past violent behavior; simply proving that you were actually bitten is sufficient enough.

The statute of limitations refers to how long following a dog bite you have to make a claim. In Illinois, you have two years from the date of your injury to file a lawsuit against those responsible for your damages.

Dog bites can cause significant physical harm but they also often lead to emotional distress which needs compensation too. These cases can include:

•

Medical expenses: Covers cost from initial emergency care through follow-up visits and other associated medical costs.

• Lost income: Damages may consider both past lost earnings as well as projected future losses.

• Pain and suffering: For enduring physical pain resulting from your injuries

• Emotional distress: Acknowledges psychological impact such as PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder)

Our team at Carlson Bier are experts Let us help ensure you receive adequate compensation if any of these situations apply to your case.

It’s crucial during this process not just assembling hard facts via medical records etc., but also selecting an experienced attorney adept at presenting compelling arguments on why these facts necessitate full compensation.

When choosing legal representation in Illinois for dog-bite-related incidents, what sets Carlson Bier apart?

• We provide personalized attention to every client case.

• Our team is composed of seasoned personal injury lawyers with a focused expertise in Illinois dog bite laws.

• We leverage our vast experience to develop strategic, effective solutions for optimal recoveries.

Remember, you are never just a number or another case for us. At Carlson Bier, our clients’ well-being and pursuit of justice remain at the core of everything we do.

The stakes following a dog bite can be high – health risks, financial burden, emotional trauma. Gathering your life pieces again requires comprehensive compensation aiming beyond mere medical expenses. Your recovery is as important to us as it is to you that’s why at Carlson Bier we aggressively represent our clients’ interests under the law.

Navigate through this challenging phase by choosing knowledgeable legal representation familiar with intricacies of Dog Bite Laws in Illinois. The clear course starts here: leaning on our commitment to delivering unyielding advocacy while holding negligent parties accountable.

If you have sustained injuries due to a dog bite incident we invite you to connect with our experienced team today. It’s essential for understanding all your legal options and fully appreciating how much your case may potentially be worth. Don’t hesitate – take advantage of complimentary consultation offered at Carlson Bier; a discussion with one of our expert attorneys will put light on where and how your journey towards justice begins click on ‘Find out my case worth” button below get started now!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Buda Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Buda

Areas of Practice in Buda

Bicycle Mishaps

Focused on legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or risky conditions.

Flame Damages

Supplying professional legal advice for patients of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Clinical Malpractice

Providing dedicated legal support for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Liability

Handling cases involving faulty products, extending expert legal guidance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Tumble Injuries

Expert in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking justice for their damages.

Infant Damages

Delivering legal aid for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Incidents

Accidents: Concentrated on guiding victims of car accidents obtain equitable settlement for wounds and losses.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Expert in providing legal support for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Semi Mishap

Extending professional legal support for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for damages.

Construction Collisions

Dedicated to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Head Impairments

Dedicated to extending expert legal representation for clients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Injuries

Skilled in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Specializing in legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unfair Passing

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and adept legal assistance to ensure justice.

Backbone Injury

Committed to supporting individuals with paralysis, offering compassionate legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​