Bicycle Accidents in Bunker Hill

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve experienced a bicycle accident in Bunker Hill, your ideal legal representation is within reach with Carlson Bier. Our extensive expertise in personal injury law and proven track record for successfully representing bicycle accident victims make us the best choice as your advocate. We comprehend fully how traumatic such an incident can be, both physically and emotionally. At Carlson Bier, we’re committed to asserting your rights and securing maximum compensation on your behalf. Knowledgeable about Illinois’ complex traffic laws that affect cyclists, our highly skilled lawyers will offer personalized advice tailored to suit each unique case scenario while ensuring compliance with legal procedures After all, fair justice should never be compromised when it comes to seeking rightful redress after bicycle accidents! Trusting Carlson Bier means choosing peace of mind—a team that uses strategy deeply rooted in legality and compassion combined with aggressive negotiations against responsible parties or insurers till justice is delivered. Choose dedication; choose excellence; choose Carlson Bier: championing justice for bicycle accident victims diligently.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Bunker Hill Illinois

The law firm of Carlson Bier prides itself on being champions for victims of personal injury, with a special focus on bicycle accidents here in Illinois. Our experienced team tirelessly advocates for the rights and interests of those who have been injured, and we understand the complexities and nuances that often accompany cases linked to bicycle accidents. Such incidents are far from uncommon; encompassing a variety of situations where negligence leads to unnecessary harm.

Bicycle accidents can emerge out of numerous scenarios: they may involve other cyclists, pedestrians, motor vehicles or even faulty cycling equipment. Despite increasing cyclist safety measures and heightened awareness campaigns, the disturbing reality is that even a leisurely ride around your block could take an unexpected turn leading to severe consequences including injuries or the loss of life.

Illinois adheres firmly to its comparative fault system when determining responsibility in bicycle accident cases. This implies that if you – as a cyclist – were partially responsible for causing the accident, any compensation awarded would consequently be reduced by your degree of fault. An intricate understanding and adept navigation within this rigid framework demands expert legal representation such as ours at Carlson Bier.

In our pursuit for justice robustly rooted in fairness, we work industriously through various stages from establishing liability through thorough investigations involving police reports reviews, scene reconstruction experts and witness testimonies among others; rigorous assessment of medical requirements based not just on immediate care but also considerations towards long-term treatment plans; right up to meticulous deliberations when negotiating settlements.

The severity condition post-accident could encompass anything from minor concussions or fractures heading into more serious repercussions like brain trauma or spinal cord injuries. In some unfortunate instances, these mishaps have also led to fatalities leaving families dealing with an irreparable emotional void coupled with financial instability due to lost income sources:

• Treatment expenses – These relate directly to medical interventions required immediately after the incident plus potential ongoing care provisions.

• Lost wages – Compensation accounts both for pay missed because at-work time and potential future earnings if your ability to work is affected.

• Pain and suffering – This non-economic damage is intended to compensate for physical discomfort, mental anguish, stress among others incurred due to the accident.

The Carlson Bier personal injury attorneys steadfastly understand that while the legal fight might seem like a daunting mountain of complex procedures, our diligence assures you of sound guidance towards navigating through various stages from documentation up until negotiations or even trials if required. Our main pursuit always remains achieving the best possible outcome thereby lessening at least one aspect of worries during these trying times.

We stand beside you combining decades of experience along with compassionate representation making sure that your interests remain paramount in all proceedings. You focus on healing while we adhere to ensuring justice rendering those responsible accountable and most importantly – procuring rightful compensation aimed at aiding better recuperation paths exonerating undue financial burdens off your shoulders.

We encourage you to further explore how exactly do we accomplish this by clicking the button below. Understandings can provide comfort when dealing with tragedies, and we sincerely hope that this insight into bicycle accidents has proved valuable. For a detailed, personalized analysis of what your case could potentially be worth; please take advantage of our free initial consultation offer extended specially for offering solace during these difficult times because at Carlson Bier – We are here for You!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Bunker Hill Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Bunker Hill

Areas of Practice in Bunker Hill

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Focused on legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Supplying skilled legal services for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Clinical Malpractice

Offering dedicated legal services for victims affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Fault

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, extending skilled legal assistance to consumers affected by defective items.

Geriatric Misconduct

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Slip Mishaps

Professional in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking justice for their injuries.

Birth Harms

Providing legal assistance for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Collisions

Incidents: Dedicated to guiding clients of car accidents get equitable recompense for hurts and impairment.

Bike Accidents

Specializing in providing legal assistance for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Ensuring experienced legal representation for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for injuries.

Construction Site Accidents

Concentrated on assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Neurological Injuries

Expert in extending dedicated legal support for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Injuries

Skilled in managing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from dog bites or creature assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Focused on legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Death

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and skilled legal representation to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Injury

Focused on advocating for persons with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer