...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Burlington

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the aftermath of a dog bite injury, it’s crucial to secure responsive, expert legal support. With Carlson Bier’s proven track record in handling personal injury cases across Illinois, choosing our dedicated team for your dog bite injuries case simply makes sense. We understand that such incidents can significantly impact both physical and psychological well-being; thus we strive to ensure optimal outcomes for affected parties. Our professional attorneys are equipped with extensive expertise specific to Illinois Dog Bite Laws – fortifying your chances of compensation for damages incurred by negligence or misconduct related to pet ownership. As seasoned practitioners within varied jurisdictions of this state, from small towns to bustling cities alike alongside renowned resilience and relentless commitment, let Carlson Bier staunchly represent you on the path towards justice and healing regarding canine-inflicted harm. Succinctly put: if you need a lawyer experienced in addressing Dog Bite Injuries in Illinois efficiently – it’s time you consider connecting with the unmistakable excellence of Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Burlington Illinois

Navigating the aftermath of a dog bite injury can be confusing and distressing. At Carlson Bier, a reputed personal injury attorney group in Illinois, we understand this complexity and strive to make your legal journey less daunting. Our expert lawyers specialize in managing dog bite injuries cases and are dedicated to ensuring that your rights aren’t compromised.

Dog bites often lead to serious physical harm like infections, scarring, nerve damage or even psychological trauma such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). These matters necessitate immediate attention not only for medical care but also legal consultation. As the victim of a dog bite incident, you should know that you have specific rights under Illinois law.

• The ‘one-bite rule’ does not apply in Illinois. You don’t have to prove that the owner knew their dog was dangerous.

• You could recover financial compensation if you were peacefully conducting yourself when bitten.

• If you didn’t provoke the dog before it attacked, you could seek restitution.

This information is crucial when handling your case because an efficiently presented claim could potentially cover your medical expenses, future treatment costs – if necessary – lost wages due to inability to work during recovery and pain/suffering endured owing to the hostile encounter.

No amount of caution can guarantee complete protection against canine aggression; dog owners must bear the onus for their pet’s behavior. However, understanding these laws can help ensure that victims receive fair assessment and just settlement – something that our adept attorneys at Carlson Bier diligently work towards. We represent clients with determination and tenacity while navigating intricate legalities delicately contextualized within individual circumstances of each case.

While hiring an attorney might seem like an added pressure amidst getting back on track health-wise post-injury, having Carlson Bier by your side offers comprehensive support crucial for attaining seamless resolution along with securing maximum possible damages. Here’s how we bring unparalleled value:

• Unwavering focus: Dog bite cases form a primary vertical of our practice, so we’re on top of all related updates.

• Skilled negotiation: Our attorneys prove instrumental in negotiating fair settlement amounts.

• Savvy trial representation: We’ll be prepared to go to court if the case cannot be resolved via an agreement.

At Carlson Bier, we don’t outsource work. Instead, you’ll have experienced personal injury lawyers working throughout your case investigation. They’ll deal effectively with law enforcement agencies and insurance companies while maintaining compassionate communication with you.

Our intent is not merely to legally represent but become reliable partners helping victims navigate aftermaths compassionately yet assertively. By meticulously documenting incidents and injuries, conducting comprehensive analysis for potential claim validity and ensuring claims are accurately valued respecting medical costs as well as pain/suffering endured by clients, our proficient legal team extends unparalleled support mapping complex litigation journeys.

Remember that time is critical when it comes to dog bite cases in Illinois – there’s a particular period within which one needs to file a lawsuit; failure would mean forfeiting potentially owed compensation rights. Be assured that at Carlson Bier, our priority is safeguarding your interests!

Injuries resulting from dog bites can inflict immense physical trauma and induce significant economic setbacks due to treatment expenses and lost income during recovery periods. Yet among these challenges lies a beacon of hope – justice! Consult professional attorneys like us who specialize in this particular area for achieving favorable outcomes.

Justice might seem elusive post-trauma but trust Carlson Bier’s collective experience spanning years handling numerous successful dog bite cases could translate into justice served for you too! Click the button below now to find out how much your case could potentially be worth! Confront circumstance assertively – secure maximum possible damages allowing swift recuperation without unreasonable financial constraints through expert legal assistance from Carlson Bier!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Burlington Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Burlington

Areas of Practice in Burlington

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Specializing in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Burn Burns

Extending adept legal advice for victims of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Medical Malpractice

Extending experienced legal representation for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Liability

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, providing adept legal help to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Tumble Mishaps

Skilled in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking recovery for their suffering.

Infant Injuries

Providing legal support for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Accidents: Focused on guiding patients of car accidents obtain appropriate recompense for injuries and impairment.

Scooter Collisions

Specializing in providing legal assistance for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Truck Incident

Delivering expert legal support for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for injuries.

Building Collisions

Dedicated to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Injuries

Expert in providing specialized legal services for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Wounds

Skilled in handling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Dedicated to legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Passing

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and experienced legal representation to ensure redress.

Neural Harm

Dedicated to advocating for patients with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​