FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Bushnell

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the unfortunate circumstance of a dog bite injury in Bushnell, seeking representation from competent legal professionals is essential. Carlson Bier are renowned personal injury lawyers who focus significantly on Dog Bite Injuries. Based on Illinois law, this team effectively advocates for clients suffering such injuries, strategically navigating the complexities surrounding these cases to achieve favorable outcomes. Whether dealing with questions about liability or difficulty obtaining proper compensation, count on our experience and unwavering dedication to help guide you through every step of your legal journey. What sets Carlson Bier apart resides not in their location but in their proven track record and commitment towards excellence; they’ve successfully litigated numerous dog bite cases by ensuring each client’s rights are upheld against negligent pet owners or insurance companies unwilling to reimburse due medical expenses fully. As premier choice for handling Dog Bite Injuries matters in Illinois state, choosing Carlson Bier ensures you’re placing trust where it truly counts.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Bushnell Illinois

Understanding the dire consequences that can arise from dog bite injuries are fundamental for anyone who has been a victim of such an unfortunate event. At Carlson Bier we specialize in this niche of personal injury law, leveraging our legal acumen to ensure due compensation for victims located throughout Illinois.

A dog attack is often unexpected and can lead to serious ramifications, both physically and psychologically. Some of these occurrences might be minor, but others can transmute into life-threatening situations or permanent disfigurement. Small children are generally more susceptible to grave injuries as they lack understanding about when it’s safe to approach unfamiliar dogs.

The potential physical impacts might include puncture wounds, infections, nerve damage or even diseases like rabies. The psychological aftermath could potentiate fear towards animals, difficulty sleeping or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Medical bills coupled with emotional therapy may compound quickly leading to overwhelming financial burdens.

• Potential physical impacts: Puncture wounds, Infections, Nerve damage

• Psychological impacts: Fear of animals, Sleep disturbances

• Financial Burden: Accumulating medical bills

Obtaining proper representation during these challenging times is pivotal in ensuring a just and favorable resolution to your claim. What sets Carlson Bier apart is our unrivaled commitment to advocating for our clients’ rights while navigating the complexities of personal injury law intertwined with local ordinances and state laws specific to dog bites

In most cases in Illinois including instances where a hunting or police dog bites someone within their duty – if perchance you’re bitten by a dog while lawfully present in private property or public place, it’s consequential that liability usually falls on the dog owner.

Our team at Carlson Bier is dedicated not only towards securing maximum compensation for your current predicaments but also future costs associated with ongoing medical treatments, loss of income through workplace absences and long-term side effects related to one’s psychological well-being.

Even though each case contains its level of uniqueness, reflecting different dynamic scenarios leading up to the unfortunate incident of a dog bite – at Carlson Bier our approach remains constant – in assuring that justice is served to all our clients while concurrently seeking necessary damages for enduring physical suffering with maximized restitution yields.

We firmly encourage caution when dealing with insurance companies post such tragic incidents. Insurance claims adjusters typically defend their best interests and may not fully comprehend the gravity or cost of your injuries as they offer an initial lesser claim. Our experienced attorneys can aggressively negotiate on your behalf, ensuring you obtain optimal compensation that accurately reflects the full extent of your injury.

Furthermore, considering that Illinois functions under a strict liability law concerning dog bites, this meaning that an injured person doesn’t necessarily have to prove any pre-existing negligence by the dog owner – merely proving they were bitten suffices for legal action. The understanding of these nuances in laws helps us expedite filing procedures and attaining rightful compensation much faster.

Engaging Carlson Bier as your personal injury attorney will grant you access to extensively knowledgeable resources in handling dog-bite cases cohesively across Illinois. Navigating complicated systems while dealing with traumatic experiences can be straining; therefore we pledge unwavering support during every step enveloping empathy, professionalism and result-oriented advocacy

With Carlson Bier on your side, you don’t need to face these proceedings alone. We’re prepared and equipped to stand by you in pursuit of justice while providing comfort and reassurance throughout difficult times.

Ready to find out how much your case might be worth? Click below! Unearth more about possible compensations related to your case along with gaining knowledge packaged as utmost value from seasoned experts. Trust Carlson Bier – Representing resilience through authority in Illinois’s personal injury Law terrain.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Bushnell Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Bushnell

Areas of Practice in Bushnell

Bicycle Mishaps

Expert in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Burn Burns

Offering professional legal advice for people of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Physician Misconduct

Providing professional legal representation for persons affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Responsibility

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, providing skilled legal assistance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Malpractice

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Tumble Occurrences

Specialist in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking justice for their suffering.

Birth Traumas

Supplying legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Car Mishaps

Incidents: Focused on guiding sufferers of car accidents secure appropriate compensation for harms and harm.

Scooter Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Semi Incident

Offering adept legal assistance for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for harms.

Worksite Collisions

Engaged in representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Cognitive Injuries

Committed to delivering expert legal advice for victims suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Damages

Adept at managing cases for clients who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Expert in legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unjust Passing

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and professional legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Committed to supporting patients with paralysis, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​