...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Byron

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury in Byron can be distressing and the aftermath daunting. This is where Carlson Bier steps in, to professionally navigate through the maze of legal procedures on your behalf. Known for their commitment to client care and proven record of successful advocacy with personal injuries, they stand unrivalled as an excellent choice for representation concerning dog bite injuries. Carlson Bier’s attorneys are highly proficient in Illinois law that governs such cases, ensuring due compensation is collected promptly for victims’ physical pain and emotional suffering. Their investigative approach covers all necessary bases including medical expenses, lost earnings, or any other out-of-pocket costs incurred because of a traumatic experience with a canine. Empathetic yet firm when dealing with insurance companies who may try to undercut claims unfairly – each Carlson Bier lawyer works diligently pursuing fair outcomes; you can rest easy knowing experienced specialists efficiently handle every aspect related to your case while continuously striving toward securing maximum entitled legal recompense post-dog-bite incident.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Byron Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our devoted team of personal injury attorneys from Illinois are poised to aid those who have suffered due to dog bite injuries. We recognize the harrowing circumstances victims often face and we are dedicated to providing comprehensive legal guidance and support to help navigate through this complex process.

Dog bites can lead to severe physical and emotional trauma. The nature of such injuries varies, encompassing direct damage where an animal’s teeth break the skin causing puncture wounds or tearing off skin; secondary damage which includes possible infections that might arise when bacteria from a dog’s mouth enters the bloodstream, leading to dangerous medical complications. There also exists damages related with potential lifelong consequences like scarring or psychological affliction further complicating recovery.

Understanding your rights is crucial in these scenarios. Here are some key points:

• According to Illinois Animal Control Act, dog owners hold strict liability for any harm caused by their dogs, regardless if the dog has shown previous signs of aggression.

• Victims can claim for both economic damages (hospital bills or loss of income) and non-economic damages (pain, suffering, mental anguish).

• A statute of limitations applies—victims generally have two years following the incident date to file a lawsuit.

The success of a personal injury case hinges upon evidence-collection in early stages after an incident occurs. Photos documenting injuries and the site of attack, eyewitness accounts if available along with seeking proper medical treatment immediately post-incident greatly strengthen a case against negligent pet owners–all these details sketch a more precise picture facilitating jury empathy.

Mountainous hospital bills coupled with unexpected wages lost tends not only burden already distraught victims but family members as well. At Carlson Bier we assiduously endeavor ensuring justice served entails adequate compensation comparable to losses sustained covering every spectrum—from present medical costs extending into future possible ones tied intricately with rehabilitation efforts alongside pain endured plus disfigurement caused additional accommodation costs associated compensable as elements within settlement estimations.

Regardless the extent of injury or damage, it is essential to consult a personal injury attorney well-versed in local laws. This step escalates chances for victims receiving their rightful compensation more so because typically insurance companies tend to propose minimal settlements hardly covering medical expenses let alone other damages endured.

At Carlson Bier, we take pride in our expert legal team’s capability securing maximum possible compensation for clients ensuring victorious closure to such distressing chapters enabling restoration together with desired tranquility in lives intruded upon by such unfortunate situations. In fact, Illinois law does not cap dog bite injury settlements thus implying greater possibility an experienced attorney can aid yield considerably higher compensations depending on each unique situation attesting obtaining professional legal support pivotal aspect during these trying times.

Ultimately the importance lies in finding dog bite attorneys who prioritize client needs above all else while bringing comprehensive knowledge about associated state laws and possess significant experience dealing with similar cases guaranteeing best potential outcome besides offering emotional reassurances in circumstances already difficult enough–this precisely exemplifies what you can expect from us at Carlson Bier.

Explore further how our dedicated attorneys could help your case—a simple click below will lead you through an evaluation determining likely worthiness of your case intertwined within specific nuances related to individualistic proceedings thus potentially uncovering quantum leaps desired legally equitable strategies that may pave pathways towards better restorative justice previously unimagined. No one should needlessly suffer due to another’s negligence—take action today as coordinated steps forward garner cumulative long-term benefits echoed through enriching journeys back towards normalcy.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Byron Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Byron

Areas of Practice in Byron

Cycling Mishaps

Dedicated to legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or perilous conditions.

Scald Damages

Giving expert legal help for patients of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Hospital Incompetence

Ensuring expert legal services for clients affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Accountability

Handling cases involving problematic products, supplying professional legal guidance to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Trip Mishaps

Specialist in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking recovery for their injuries.

Newborn Traumas

Extending legal guidance for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Crashes: Committed to assisting individuals of car accidents get reasonable remuneration for damages and impairment.

Motorcycle Collisions

Expert in providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Semi Collision

Delivering expert legal advice for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for injuries.

Building Site Collisions

Concentrated on representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Neurological Damages

Specializing in providing expert legal advice for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Wounds

Proficient in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Focused on legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Wrongful Loss

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and skilled legal guidance to ensure redress.

Spine Trauma

Expert in defending patients with backbone trauma, offering professional legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​