...

Bicycle Accidents in Cahokia

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When incidents like bicycle accidents occur in Cahokia, it is crucial to have representation that knows the local legal landscape and can advocate for you. That’s why Carlson Bier has devoted their practice to personal injury law, focusing on helping victims of bike accidents receive the compensation they deserve. With a strong track record of staging successful claims for clients across Illinois, they are adept at establishing liability and assessing damages effectively. The attorneys at Carlson Bier possess extensive knowledge about traffic regulations governing bicycles, as well as how medical assessments work following an accident related injuries. They are committed to guiding each client through every step of their case – from filing claims against culpable parties to tenaciously pursuing rightful settlements during negotiations or trials if necessary.They go above and beyond for all those affected by cycling mishaps , upholding principles with integrity and determination.This unwavering dedication makes Carlson Bier an excellent choice when seeking legal advice after a Bicycle Accident in Cahokia area.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Cahokia Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on being Illinois’ premier personal injury attorney group. As seasoned litigators in the challenging field of bicycle accident cases, our firm brings a wealth of legal knowledge and tactical acumen to best serve your interests. With us representing you, you get more than just an advocate; you walk hand-in-hand with a partner dedicated to unearthing all possible avenues for compensation after an injurious bike accident.

In the thriving state of Illinois, bicycling has become not only a fitness activity but also a primary mode of transportation for numerous individuals. However, this rise in popularity correlates to an unfortunate increase in biking accidents. Many factors come into play leading up to these tragic incidents: conflict with traffic regulations, poor infrastructure design such as insufficient or non-existent cycling lanes and motorist negligence are often major contributors.

It’s essential during these times that victims understand their rights within Illinois law. Primarily:

– The Illinois Vehicle Code declares bicycles as vehicles, affording cyclists the same rights on the roadways as motorists.

– Cyclists are entitled to use any section of the roadway except where expressly prohibited.

– Motorists must provide at least three feet (about one meter) clearance while overtaking a cyclist.

Now let’s delve deeper into some fundamental aspects surrounding bicycle accidents. One key point is establishing liability – who was at fault? In most cases involving motor vehicle-bicycle collisions, recklessness or inattention from motorists often leads to cyclist injuries due their slim protection against impacts compared cars’ reinforced metal frames.

Another issue concerning bicycle accidents relates to damages – what sort of losses have occurred because of the accident? Damages can be both economical like medical bills or loss in earning capacity; and non-economic such as emotional distress or loss of enjoyment from life’s activities following severe injuries sustained. Helping clients compile comprehensive documents and presenting strong argumentation are cornerstones for achieving fair compensations

Understanding insurance coverage can also be bewildering. Depending on the case, different insurance policies can come into play, such as auto insurance of the at-fault driver, medical payment coverage or even homeowner’s insurance for bicycle damage in cases where the accident occurs close to home.

Dealing with a cycling accident can be stressful & overwhelming; however, you don’t have to face this journey alone. At Carlson Bier we understand every detail matters when it comes to justice and rightful compensation. With decades of experience and a mindset devoted solely to representing injury victims we are committed to handling all aspects of your claim attentively and professionally.

Effective protection against negligent parties is not just about achieving monetary compensations; it’s also about fostering safer roads for all users in Illinois through precedents that deter irresponsible behaviors leading to needless accidents. Your case may mark an important step towards attaining more respect for cyclists’ rights on our roads.

Laws regarding personal injuries from bike accidents can be complex and frequently change. That’s why our team persists in continual legal education, sturdily keeping pace with amendments so we consistently provide top-notch representation regardless of how laws evolve over time.

The path ahead might appear daunting without skilful navigation but rest assured: backed by deep commitment, tenacious litigation efforts, and an unwavering dedication to your wellbeing – you’ll never walk alone once entrusting us with your cause.

Your claim isn’t merely a file digit in our folders – it embodies deeply personal experiences that deserve care respect & understanding through each step along this challenging road aiming toward brighter days.

Ready to gauge the potential worth of your case? Here’s good news! The cumbersome task of figuring out compensation averages needn’t hang over you any longer. Now you can simply click on the button below which will lead you through uncomplicated steps designed specifically to calculate an estimate quickly and definitively.

While their accuracy isn’t absolute these results tend raise awareness concerning full-width of potential compensations which victims may overlook while burdened by aftermaths from an unfortunate accident.

So take the first step toward a resilient future today. With Carlson Bier, stand united against negligence and injustice on Illinois’ roads. Together we can achieve more than just compensation – but a change towards safer streets for all.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Cahokia Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Cahokia

Areas of Practice in Cahokia

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Proficient in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Giving expert legal support for victims of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Healthcare Malpractice

Providing dedicated legal advice for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Liability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, extending professional legal assistance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Abuse

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Trip & Trip Injuries

Specialist in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking compensation for their suffering.

Childbirth Harms

Offering legal guidance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Incidents: Concentrated on aiding clients of car accidents receive fair payout for injuries and destruction.

Bike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal services for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

18-Wheeler Collision

Delivering specialist legal support for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for damages.

Building Site Crashes

Engaged in assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Neurological Damages

Focused on offering dedicated legal advice for victims suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Wounds

Adept at tackling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Expert in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Loss

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and professional legal assistance to ensure justice.

Backbone Harm

Focused on defending victims with paralysis, offering specialized legal services to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer