Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Cahokia

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a Slip and Fall Accident in Cahokia, the litigation process can be overwhelming. You need an experienced legal team like Carlson Bier on your side who are highly knowledgeable of Illinois laws regarding such cases. This top-tier law firm has extensive expertise in these types of accidents, ensuring that your rights are protected while aiming for the best possible outcomes. By combining their thorough understanding of complex legislation and their dedication to personal touch, they offer comprehensive legal services that prioritize client needs. Their remarkable track record in achieving successful settlements and verdicts is testament to their capabilities as a superior choice for those involved in Slip And Fall Accidents. Being well-acquainted with Cahokia’s demographic factors also gives them unique insights into strategizing local court proceedings effectively without violating the state’s advertising law mandates. Hence, if you require reliable representation from committed experts who will fight relentlessly for your cause, look no further than Carlson Bier as they stand tall among other attorneys specializing in Slip And Fall Accidents.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Cahokia Illinois

Navigating the aftermath of a Slip and Fall Accident can be both daunting and confusing, particularly when trying to determine liability and navigating applicable Illinois laws. At Carlson Bier, we offer unparalleled legal expertise steeped in a rich understanding of these complex affairs. Our team is dedicated to protecting your rights as an accident victim and ensuring that you obtain every bit of compensation you deserve.

Slip and fall accidents occur far too often but despite their frequency, many people underestimate the severity of injuries that can result from such occurrences. These include broken bones, spinal cord injuries, brain injuries, cuts, bruises or even disability. It’s critical to seek immediate medical attention following any slip or fall incident not only for your personal wellbeing but also because medical records play a significant role in providing evidentiary support that substantiates your claim.

• Immediate medical attention aids early detection of severe injury

• Medical records provide substantial evidence to support your claim

Determining fault in Slip and Fall Accidents requires precise analysis which is best conducted by a seasoned personal injury lawyer. Two factors commonly influence this: identifying if the property owner acted ‘carelessly’ thus allowing a dangerous condition to persist; or if the injured party was careless and did not notice what could reasonably be termed an ‘obvious’ hazard site.

Carlson Bier excels at decoding these often-complicated dynamics surrounding fault determination in Slip and Fall cases. We meticulously examine all details including scrutinizing maintenance records of premise owners among other relevant facts to build an unshakable case for our clients.

Fundamental components assessed during case-building include:

• Property owner’s duty – Did they exhibit reasonable care towards maintaining safe premises?

• Plaintiff’s action – Was there caution exercised while navigating through hazardous zones?

Illinois law provides substantial protection for victims of slip-and-fall incidents under Premises Liability Law. This asserts that property owners are legally responsible for assuring safety on their properties; any slip and fall injury due to negligence may result in a liability claim. However, it’s worth noting that the burden of proof lies with the plaintiff who needs to demonstrate unequivocally that the accident was a direct result of the property owner’s negligence.

In Illinois, there is also a unique aspect referred to as Comparative Fault Rule, which allows compensation for victims even if they had partial fault in an accident.

This means that you could still be eligible for damages although at a reduced rate proportional to your share of blame. All these components underscore why mastery of local laws, offered by Carlson Bier can make significant difference to your case.

• Understand Premises Liability Law – Invoke your right against negligent property owners.

• Know about Comparative Fault Rule – Secure some compensation despite shared fault scenario.

Your journey towards fair compensation starts on acknowledgement that slip and fall cases are not necessarily straightforward litigation processes. They mingle elements such as legal and insurance issues requiring seasoned personal attention coupled with proficient legal guidance; all purposed towards rightfully reclaiming what is owed you from liable parties or their insurers.

Remember time is crucial following such accidents – The earlier actions commence after event occurrence, chances are higher for evidence collection leading to positive outcomes. In facilities like malls or public buildings where CCTV cameras might have captured occurrence, early action triggers immediate preservation requests stalling potential data erasure.

In pursuit of unmatchable client satisfaction levels and results delivered Carlson Bier successfully blends practical experience, knowledge depth partnered by personalized care reflecting our unwavering commitment to supporting clients navigate demanding times effectively restoring lost health and stability.

Ready now more than ever? Click on the button below to find out how much your case is potentially worth! At Carlson Bier, we genuinely believe in providing justice rather than making grandiose promises – We’re poised waiting to champion you towards deserved victory lane today!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Cahokia Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Cahokia

Areas of Practice in Cahokia

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or hazardous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Supplying adept legal advice for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Clinical Incompetence

Delivering expert legal services for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Obligation

Managing cases involving defective products, supplying skilled legal support to victims affected by defective items.

Geriatric Misconduct

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Stumble Injuries

Professional in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking compensation for their damages.

Infant Injuries

Extending legal aid for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Collisions

Incidents: Concentrated on helping individuals of car accidents gain equitable compensation for hurts and damages.

Motorbike Collisions

Committed to providing legal assistance for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

18-Wheeler Accident

Ensuring experienced legal advice for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for harms.

Worksite Mishaps

Committed to representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Injuries

Specializing in delivering compassionate legal support for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Damages

Adept at tackling cases for people who have suffered damages from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Collisions

Dedicated to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Death

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and expert legal representation to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Impairment

Focused on representing clients with paralysis, offering dedicated legal support to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer