...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Cairo

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to dog bite injuries, understanding the process and nuances involved is critical. That’s where Carlson Bier enters – a premier law firm that specializes in personal injury cases with a specific focus on dog bites. We’ve honed skills through years of staunch advocacy for victims across Illinois in seeking fair compensation for their pain, medical costs, lost income or emotional distress caused by such incidents. Acknowledged expertise coupled with utmost dedication ensures every case achieves its deserved settlement. Given our vast experience and impressive track record, Carlson Bier stands out as the preferred choice among those who need sound support after a canine attack incident; being vigilant on your rights under stringent Illinois dog bite laws while fighting relentlessly to ensure justice prevails makes us stand apart from conventional law practices. Despite geographical differences mattering little when quality representation is concerned; rest assured knowing you’re served by practiced hands at Carlson Bier – striving consistently to champion your interests wherever injustice strikes.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Cairo Illinois

Dog bite injuries are harrowing experiences that can result in long-lasting physical and emotional damage. As one of the leading personal injury law firms based in Illinois, Carlson Bier is committed to helping victims recover their lives. Our goal is to illuminate your legal rights and explain how we can assist you through this trying time.

A dog bite incident may seem relatively clear-cut, yet its implications are multi-faceted, involving medical evaluations, insurance claims, potential homeowners’ policies, and possibly liability suits against pet owners or caretakers. At Carlson Bier, our seasoned attorneys have a comprehensive understanding of these complexities.

• Immediate Medical Attention: Seeking immediate professional treatment post-dog bite is paramount; not only for treating wounds but also for creating medical records proving the extent of harm inflicted.

• Reporting the Incident: It’s important to report dog bites to local authorities promptly. Such action leads to an official account of the event which could be used as evidence in court.

• Documenting Evidence: Photos of injuries plus statements from eyewitnesses can be powerful pieces of proof. We encourage clients to compile any information surrounding their incidents meticulously.

Illinois law upholds strict liability when it comes to dog bites. Under Section 16 of Animal Control Act (510 ILCS 5/), if an unprovoked dog or other animal attacks a person peacefully conducting themselves in a place they may legally be, the owner is liable for civil damages. Meaning that under most circumstances, even if a dog never exhibited aggressive behavior previously or the owner took protective steps, they can still potentially be held responsible for damages caused by their pet’s actions.

As experienced personal injury lawyers at Carlson Bier, we endeavor fervently on your behalf using all aspects of legal arsenal available within Illinois laws’ framework—to ascertain you receive deserved reparations. We review police reports comprehensively along with detailed analysis of relevant health care records incurred due to the occurrence—working hand-in-hand with medical experts—to highlight the after-effects of injuries sustained which might encompass long-term physical discomfort, emotional trauma, or cosmetic deficits.

Moreover, we engage in efficient negotiations on your behalf with involved insurance firms. If claims can’t reach a favorable settlement outside courtrooms, we’re ready to take the case before jurors genuinely articulating the pain you’ve endured due to someone else’s negligence.

Understandably, coming up against dog owners who may be neighbors or friends carries an emotional burden. However, Carlson Bier assures all our clients that filing a claim isn’t about animosity—rather it’s focused on accessing financial resources to aid your recovery process comfortably plus eventually resume regular life effectively. Amid such draining circumstances, having dedicated legal representation by attorneys at Carlson Bier means personal attention—every step of the way!

So why choose us? As Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys,

• We possess proven track record evidencing substantial settlements and verdicts favoring our clientele spanning numerous years.

• Our law team maintains constant communication ensuring you stay abreast throughout your case proceedings.

• You pay us only if compensation is secured successfully for your cause—the no-win-no-fee promise bound securely by our commitment towards fair justice.

At Carlson Bier—the leading personal injury law group in Illinois—we strive relentlessly combating dog bite accidents’ aftermath so victims like you return back stronger than ever! Want authentic details regarding possible damages owed? Why not click on the button below to ascertain how much your specific case could worth monetarily? At Carlson Bier — We are always here because—injustice has met its match!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Cairo Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Cairo

Areas of Practice in Cairo

Bicycle Incidents

Specializing in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Scald Wounds

Offering skilled legal advice for people of serious burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Physician Negligence

Extending experienced legal advice for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Liability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, delivering skilled legal assistance to victims affected by harmful products.

Senior Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Tumble Accidents

Expert in managing trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking restitution for their damages.

Infant Injuries

Supplying legal support for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Collisions

Accidents: Focused on supporting sufferers of car accidents gain reasonable recompense for harms and harm.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Expert in providing legal support for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Big Rig Collision

Providing expert legal assistance for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for hurts.

Construction Accidents

Focused on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Brain Impairments

Dedicated to offering dedicated legal assistance for individuals suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Injuries

Adept at managing cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Incidents

Expert in legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unfair Demise

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and experienced legal representation to ensure fairness.

Spine Harm

Specializing in advocating for victims with backbone trauma, offering professional legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​