FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Calumet City

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been victim to a dog bite injury in Calumet City, turn to the seasoned attorneys at Carlson Bier. We specialize in personal injury claims, with emphasis on assisting victims of such traumatic incidents recover fair compensation. Leveraging years of expertise, our dedicated team understands the nuances of Illinois laws regarding dog bite injuries and their subsequent personal distress- physical or emotional trauma, medical bills or lost wages from time off work. Count on us as your ally; we’ll tirelessly advocate for you ensuring that justice is served while helping ease your resettlement process after such an unsettling incident. With proven results and hands-on approach throughout Illinois state-wide cases like yours – turns out choosing Carlson Bier isn’t just prioritizing legal competence but compassion as well. Come feel the difference we can make when navigating a complex landscape becomes indispensable towards regaining control over your life post-dog-bite occurrence.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Calumet City Illinois

Dog bites can lead to severe injuries, not only physically but emotionally as well and when this happens, it’s crucial to have an experienced team advocating for your rights. At Carlson Bier, we stand with you in the pursuit of justice, presenting your case authentically. We are a skilled Illinois based legal group specializing in personal injury law and dog bite cases specifically.

Dog Bite Injuries emerge in various forms and degrees of severity – ranging from minor superficial scratches to significant wounds that require surgical intervention. While physical harm is most evident following these incidents, psychological trauma shouldn’t be overlooked either. Many victims find themselves at risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), phobias or panic attacks triggered by their harrowing ordeal.

• Physical damage: This includes skin tearing, bone fracturing or deep tissue damage caused directly by the dog’s teeth.

• Infection: The wounds can become infected and result in further health complications if not treated promptly.

• Long-term effects: As previously mentioned, victims often struggle with emotional distress long after the incident.

Understanding Illinois state laws about dog bombardments is also important. One critical fact is that liability generally falls on the pet owner regardless if they were aware or unaware of any vicious tendencies in previous actions by their pet unless provocation took place prior to the attack. This aspect significantly strengthens victims’ grounds for receiving fair compensation for medical expenses incurred due to their injuries plus potential pain and suffering costs.

At Carlson Bier LLC., our approach revolves around three key steps:

• Preparation: Our expert team believes in thorough preparation before proceeding towards litigation or negotiation with involved parties.

• Presentation: Presenting your case effectively according to the specifics of your incident is vital during negotiations mediations or trials.

• Perseverance: Our commitment prevails whether through complex disagreements long-winded disputes or tough negotiations – until justice prevails for you.

In terms of monetary value assigned to each case, many factors come into play. These include the severity of the injuries incurred, medical expenses carried out due to those injuries, lost earning potential if you were unable to work subsequent psychological distress experienced and how impactful this incident has been on your daily life.

It’s crucial that key evidence is preserved following a dog bite injury. This includes photographic records of all wounds sustained before healing occurs medical documents detailing your treatment route and invoices associated with these treatments. The more comprehensive your documentation, the stronger grounds for compensation claims you could have.

Ultimately achieving justice after suffering a dog bite injury requires expertise in this specialized personal injury law area. The Carlson Bier team prides ourselves on our commitment to helping each client navigate through these difficult times whilst fighting tirelessly for their rights.

Furthermore, we want you to feel confident as we proceed by giving you control over decisions related to settling or refusing offers that may arise during negotiations with liable parties or taking your case fully through trial if necessary,

Even though no amount can make up entirely distinctively challenging ordeal endured it’s important that victims don’t bear financial burdens single-handedly especially when another party’s negligence led to such circumstance.

Wouldn’t it be great if there was an exact number assigned automatically post every dog bite attack? Unfortunately, cases aren’t resolved so simply but here at Carlson Bier LLC., we’re committed to helping interpret these complexities so you don’t have to do it alone.

Interested in discovering what may reasonably be obtainable from a claim for your specific case? We urge our website visitors who are seeking legal advice regarding their situations involving animal attacks like dog bites take full advantage of our free evaluation tool found below: Click on the button beneath this paragraph now for insightful information tailored toward quite possibly assisting in some ease towards any current uncertainties – Find out how much YOUR case might just be worth!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Calumet City Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Calumet City

Areas of Practice in Calumet City

Bike Accidents

Expert in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Supplying adept legal services for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Medical Carelessness

Ensuring specialist legal advice for persons affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, extending expert legal services to customers affected by harmful products.

Aged Neglect

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble & Stumble Accidents

Expert in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking redress for their suffering.

Neonatal Injuries

Delivering legal support for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Crashes: Devoted to helping clients of car accidents receive just remuneration for harms and damages.

Bike Collisions

Committed to providing representation for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

18-Wheeler Collision

Ensuring expert legal advice for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for damages.

Construction Site Collisions

Concentrated on supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Head Impairments

Focused on extending compassionate legal advice for persons suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Traumas

Expertise in handling cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Committed to legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Unjust Passing

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and skilled legal services to ensure justice.

Backbone Harm

Focused on supporting patients with paralysis, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​