FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Candlewick Lake

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

After a dog bite injury, your priority should be securing legal representation that is knowledgeable and experienced in this specific field. Choosing Carlson Bier, with its track record of success in representing clients who have been victims of dog bites, will put you on the path to justice. Rooted deeply within Illinois law, they’re equipped with comprehensive understanding about complexities surrounding such incidents. Their tailored strategies ensure maximum compensation for any physical or emotional pain suffered, healthcare costs incurred, or lost wages due to recovery time off from work. The firm’s meticulously prepared cases leave no stone unturned while establishing dog owner liability under Illinois’ stringent ‘strict liability’ laws for Dog Bite Injuries. Every client receives dedicated personal attention backed by professional acumen at Carlson Bier; they clearly understand how dog-related injuries can interfere drastically not just physically but also emotionally with your life rhythm hence prefer a compassionate approach towards every case irrespective of its magnitude. Entrust your case to Carlson Bier – an incomparable choice when it comes to seeking justice and rightful compensation from Dog Bite Injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Candlewick Lake Illinois

Understanding Dog Bite Injuries in Illinois: Your Legal Rights and Remedies

Despite the common phrase, “His bark is worse than his bite,” there is nothing trivial about being a victim of a dog attack. Carlson Bier, as experienced personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, understand this fact better than anyone else. We have assisted numerous clients who suffered physically as well as emotionally due to dog bites or attacks. Unlike other personal injury cases, dog bite injuries present unique legal challenges and require expert representation from savvy attorneys like us.

Dog bite injuries can vary in severity—they can range from mild nips to severe mauling which could potentially lead to significant wounds, nerve damage, scarring, and even psychological trauma. Indeed, grappling with such injuries imposes great emotional distress on victims. The serious impact that dog bite injuries might have on your life should never be minimized.

In Illinois, the law clearly highlights liability for pet owners in case of dog attacks. Under the Illinois Animal Control Act:

• Owners are held strictly liable for any harm caused by their dogs.

• Pet owners can face penalties if they fail to intervene during an attack.

• An owner’s negligence isn’t required for them to be accountable; even if the animal hasn’t shown aggressive behavior before the incident.

Awareness regarding these facts is paramount because it not only helps you realize that you are protected under state law but also prompts you believe in maximizing these protections post any unfortunate encounters involving canine aggression.

Making sense of complex legalities surrounding dog bites can seem daunting when dealing with physical pain or mental trauma following an attack. But having reliable professionals by your side can alleviate much stress associated with pursuing compensation claims—the sole purpose behind our dedicated service at Carlson Bier.

On hiring us:

• We meticulously analyze details around your case—everything from gathering essential medical records and evidence related to the event right down ensuring witness testimonies align with events recounted.

• Our seasoned lawyers operate under contingency fees, which means that unless we successfully recover compensation on your behalf, you won’t owe us anything.

• We strive to secure maximum settlement amounts for our clients by effectively negotiating with insurance companies and not backing down until they step up to fulfill their obligations fairly.

At Carlson Bier, it’s etched into our ethos that dog bite victims should never be left alone to bear the burdens of others’ negligence. Our considerable experience representing dog bite injury claims in Illinois has resulted in many favorable settlements and verdicts— a testament to our relentless fight for justice on behalf of injured clients.

Your immediate task following a dog attack takes two-fold: seek necessary medical help followed by legal advice at the earliest from trusted lawyers like those at Carlson Bier Group. By doing so, you fast track moving past this painful episode, embarking on a path of recovery amidst care and justice rightly deserved.

The law designed to protect victims in Illinois is complex but also advantageous when leveraged correctly. If these details are overwhelming or if your personal case appears unique—dozens of variables can shape each individual claim—we urge you to reach out to us right away without delay! Click on the button below to find out how much your case could potentially be worth. Get started now for no cost or obligation towards hastening your journey towards healing well-aligned with gains rightfully yours!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Candlewick Lake Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Candlewick Lake

Areas of Practice in Candlewick Lake

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Focused on legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Fire Burns

Offering skilled legal advice for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Delivering specialist legal assistance for clients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Responsibility

Handling cases involving dangerous products, delivering specialist legal support to clients affected by defective items.

Senior Abuse

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble & Tumble Mishaps

Expert in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking redress for their injuries.

Neonatal Traumas

Delivering legal aid for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Accidents: Dedicated to helping clients of car accidents receive appropriate remuneration for hurts and destruction.

Motorcycle Incidents

Committed to providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Big Rig Accident

Extending adept legal support for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for harms.

Worksite Collisions

Concentrated on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Neurological Impairments

Specializing in ensuring specialized legal assistance for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Traumas

Specialized in managing cases for persons who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Expert in legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unjust Loss

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and skilled legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Neural Harm

Dedicated to advocating for persons with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440