...

Car Accident Attorney in Capron

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to navigating the intricate path towards justice following a car accident, you deserve an exceptional level of assistance. Carlson Bier emerges as your best ally in these scenarios, with our sterling reputation as personal injury lawyers. Based firmly on the pillars of competency and dedicated service, we are geared to help residents in Capron amidst their stressful situations. We possess vast experience handling various complexities associated with car accidents that truly sets us apart from other legal practitioners in Illinois; a blend of profound legal acumen along with empathetic client relationships aids us in delivering excellent outcomes consistently. Furthermore, at Carlson Bier firm, our pivotal goal lies not merely to fight for compensation for our clients but strive ardently to secure maximum restitution that helps them rebuild their lives post-accident. Choose Carlson Bier – your ticket towards achieving effective professional support married adeptly to distinctive personalized attention during critical times surrounding a car accident ordeal!

About Carlson Bier

Car Accident Lawyers in Capron Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we believe that knowledge is power and understanding your legal rights following a car accident can make all the difference in the outcome of your case. Our dedicated team of skilled personal injury attorneys, located in Illinois, are committed to educating you every step of the way.

A vehicle collision can be an incredibly traumatic experience and maneuvering through the aftermath comes with its own set of unique challenges. Securing evidence from the crash site such as pictures or videos, witness testimonies or even official reports can significantly influence the course of a legal claim. Knowing to record this information at this crucial time could greatly benefit your attorney’s capacity to present a comprehensive representation on your behalf.

Moreover, it’s pivotal to understand that each auto accident holds different variables and circumstances which determine how compensation claims are approached. Whether it’s a simple fender-bender, T-bone collision or multiple vehicle pile-up; understanding these categories help shape our legal strategy catering specifically to your situation.

You may also want to know several types of damages for which compensation might possibly be demanded:

• Medical bills: These include initial hospitalization costs as well as future medical expenses related to injury treatments.

• Lost wages: If an injury causes you exorbitant work absences, incapacity to continue regular job functions or complete loss of employment; these factors could translate into possible higher compensations.

• Pain and suffering: Emotional distress caused by physical pain, anxiety, depression after an accident qualifies under this category.

Knowing when exactly to file a claim further ensures no potential entitlements slip away due to missed deadlines. In Illinois typically few exceptions aside – victims must present claims within two years post-accident date.

It’s important you realize insurance companies exist not just covering but mitigating their losses too. Quick settlement offers seem like easy fixes however might not cover long-term consequences like future medical costs or extended time-off work injuries may require. Here at Carlson Bier, we advocate against settling without ascertaining complete aware of claim’s potential value.

Equally noteworthy is understanding legal rights are exercised within the scope of Illinois state laws. Complying with existing rules like notifying the police immediately after an accident, reporting incident promptly to your insurance provider and avoiding self-incriminating statements during communication bear significant implications upon eventual outcomes.

Trial proceedings aren’t always necessary in dealing with injury claims. Often times you’ll find that settlements can be obtained via mediation or negotiation meetings which save time and expenses for both parties involved. At Carlson Bier, our ultimate goal extends beyond winning – it’s ensuring you’re adequately compensated while making processes as efficient and stress-free as possible.

At the end of the day, getting through a car accident is discombobulating enough. Being well informed should not add any extra burden on top of what you face post-accident – it should lighten them. Taking advantage of our online resources or reaching out directly to one of our experienced attorneys conveys a clearer understanding about your rights and obligations following such unfortunate incidents.

Navigating complex legal territories alone could eventually cost more than constructive professional assistance – financially or otherwise. You’re not alone, reach out today.

We’d like to invite you to click on the button below now; receive an estimate at no obligation regarding potential worth of your case from one-of-a-kind professionals who truly care because here at Carlson Bier Associates LLC., knowing better equates doing better for every client we represent.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Capron Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Car Accident FAQ​

The most common causes of car accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause drivers to lose control of their vehicles.
  • Vehicle defects: Defective vehicles can cause accidents in a variety of ways.
  • Weather conditions: Rain, snow, and ice can make roads slick and dangerous.

If you are involved in a car accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a car accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a car accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

    Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your vehicle.

    Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for car accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Capron

Areas of Practice in Capron

Bike Incidents

Proficient in legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Scald Injuries

Offering adept legal support for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Physician Negligence

Extending professional legal assistance for persons affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Responsibility

Handling cases involving faulty products, extending skilled legal guidance to victims affected by harmful products.

Elder Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Tumble Accidents

Skilled in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking restitution for their injuries.

Neonatal Damages

Offering legal help for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Mishaps: Concentrated on assisting sufferers of car accidents get equitable remuneration for harms and harm.

Scooter Accidents

Committed to providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Semi Crash

Delivering expert legal assistance for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for harms.

Construction Mishaps

Dedicated to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Neurological Traumas

Expert in delivering dedicated legal support for patients suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Traumas

Adept at tackling cases for persons who have suffered damages from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Crashes

Dedicated to legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Demise

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and adept legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spine Harm

Committed to supporting victims with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer