FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Carlock

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When pedestrian accidents occur in Carlock, many turn to the exceptional services of Carlson Bier, an Illinois-based personal injury law firm. Well-versed in dealing with tragic and often complex cases involving pedestrians, they are indefatigable defenders of justice with a remarkable record of wins. Pedestrian injuries can be life-altering; hence speedy legal response is essential for securing maximum compensation. To this end, Carlson Bier is committed not just to providing unparalleled legal representation but also ensuring their clients’ rights and interests are protected every step along the way. Drawing from a wealth of experience handling pedestrian accident lawsuits successfully across Illinois, they meticulously craft bespoke strategies tailored to each case’s specifics – all geared towards helping victims achieve deserved settlements swiftly and efficiently. If you or your loved one has been involved in a pedestrian accident within Carlock city limits or environs,summoning the astute prowess of Carlson Bier ensures you have distinguished champions fighting relentlessly on your side during these challenging moments.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Carlock Illinois

Carlson Bier is one of the leading law firms in Illinois, specializing in personal injury law with a strong pedigree in protecting the rights of pedestrians wounded in devastating accidents. Our attorneys fiercely safeguard your interests and work tirelessly to ensure you promptly receive the justice, compensation, and peace of mind you deserve.

Pedestrian accidents are unfortunately quite common across the country, including in Illinois. They can result from numerous instances such as negligent driving, texting while driving or other forms of distraction, speeding vehicles not observing crosswalk regulations—one never knows when they might become a victim. Given their unprotected status compared to vehicle occupants, pedestrians almost always risk severe consequences.

Key aspects to consider after enduring such an incident include:

• Immediate medical check-up: Even if your injuries aren’t immediately perceivable or appear minor initially—some could be internal or gradually surface over time—it’s critical that you rush yourself for thorough diagnosis and treatment without delay.

• Collect evidence: If possible and safe post-accident circumstances permitting, try documenting the accident scene through photos/videos capturing broken traffic signals/negligent automobile details/etc., verify any eyewitnesses’ contact details available nearby who may aid your claim later.

• Report Police: Notify local enforcement personnel arriving on site—they’ll register official documentation upon investigating which assists during insurance claim/liability determination procedures afterwards.

• Consult experienced personal injury attorney: Approach trustworthy lawyers like us—a crucial step often overlooked by many—in order for detailed advice based on legal considerations specific to your situation be it related insurance issues/legalities surrounding responsible parties & damages review…everything until ensuring rightful remuneration reaches you.

Unlike countless auto accidents where determining liability may sometimes prove contentious due to multiple involved factors/potentials drivers clashing perspectives even implicating bystanders occasionally- pedestrian incidents typically see victims absolved from majority blame throughout liability deliberations because very rarely do we witness walkers leap directly into cars’ paths intentionally/otherwise indulging reckless behavior essentially meaning drivers generally shoulder larger blame liability proportions. Also remember that apart from survival costs or medical bills, victims may be eligible for other numerous damages often overlooked initially: loss of wages due to work absence/psychological trauma endured… your lawyer’s ability to rightfully ascertain and award these go long way resolving cases successfully.

Illinois law stipulates a two-year statute of limitations on personal injury claims—which means you have two years from the accident date to file a lawsuit in the state’s civil court system. Therefore it is crucial not to delay reaching out to an expert pedestrian accident attorney who can guide you through this legal labyrinth and ensure no detail is left unfactored while beetling against time.

The team at Carlson Bier recognizes each case’s unique intricacies—offering tailored advice according one’s circumstances. Our primary mission aside securing comprehensive benefits which our clients solely deserve also firmly involves propelling awareness about pedestrian rights as well as responsibilities within society thereby contributing reducing such unfortunate instances entirely going forward.

Navigating legal systems alone especially post traumatic accidents can be overwhelming hence why we’re here taking that unnecessary pressure off – whether it’s answering queries/simplifying complex issues/negotiating with tough insurance companies—we perform everything allowing you focus speedy recovery entrusting us take care rest behind scenes tirelessly championing cause until justice served swiftly fairly. So don’t hesitate any longer—they say information is power; click the button below today for free evaluation concerning case stand potentially see valuable it turns worth thus far simultaneously discovering exactly how Carlson Bier strip back layers doubt replacing firm reassurance detailed guidance accurate compensation owed.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Carlock Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Carlock

Areas of Practice in Carlock

Bicycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Burn Burns

Extending skilled legal help for people of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Hospital Misconduct

Offering experienced legal advice for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Accountability

Managing cases involving problematic products, providing skilled legal guidance to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Abuse

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Slip Mishaps

Adept in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking recovery for their losses.

Infant Traumas

Offering legal assistance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Car Collisions

Collisions: Committed to aiding sufferers of car accidents gain equitable settlement for injuries and destruction.

Bike Crashes

Focused on providing legal advice for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

Big Rig Crash

Offering adept legal assistance for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for injuries.

Construction Site Mishaps

Dedicated to advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Head Traumas

Focused on delivering professional legal representation for victims suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Wounds

Skilled in addressing cases for persons who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Expert in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unjust Loss

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and adept legal services to ensure justice.

Backbone Impairment

Expert in defending individuals with paralysis, offering expert legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440