...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Carlyle

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with dog bite injuries in Carlyle, a comprehensive understanding of Illinois law is paramount. This is where the expertise of Carlson Bier comes into play. We are well-versed in navigating the complicated legal landscape that surrounds such incidents and we take pride in our approach to representing victims of these unfortunate occurrences. Our dedicated legal team realizes the emotional and physical trauma tied to these episodes; hence, we endeavor to achieve maximum compensation for every client’s pain and suffering. Our credentials speak for themselves as we have consistently demonstrated unrivaled attention to detail when handling these types of cases and presenting them before courts or negotiating terms with insurers. With Carlson Bier, you not only get a zealous advocate but also experience unmatched empathy towards your circumstances—a combination rare amongst personal injury attorneys today . So if you fall victim to a dog bite incident within Carlyle city limits, allow our incomparable proficiency guide you on this strenuous journey towards justice and financial recovery.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Carlyle Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we passionately champion the rights of those who have been victims of personal injury incidents in Illinois. As an esteemed law firm specializing in personal injuries incurred as a result of dog bites and attacks, we possess expertise that is paramount to securing fair and satisfactory compensation. We understand your pain, and are committed to guiding you towards justice with professionalism and diligence.

When it comes to dog bite cases, our team understands that each situation is unique with its nuances and complexities. Under Illinois law, owners are strictly liable for any damage their dogs cause; however, winning your claim involves proving negligence on behalf of the owner or handler beyond this principle. This can be challenging without proven experience navigating these legal waters – making our services crucial to delivering the results you deserve.

There are several considerations when dealing with Dog Bite Injuries:

– An immediate visit to a healthcare provider is essential: Not only does this guarantee necessary medical attention but it also provides indispensable documentation should legal action follow.

– Report the incident: Informing local authorities helps establish a record – another valuable tool when pursuing fairness.

– Gather information regarding the dog’s owner: Names, addresses, phone numbers – these details matter when filing your lawsuit.

– Evidence collection is crucial: Photographic evidence of injuries or location where the attack occurred strengthens your case substantially.

Dealing with traumatic experiences like these can feel overwhelming without a skilled advocate at your side. The aftermath often leads to significant medical bills from treatments such as rabies vaccinations or plastic surgery procedures needed for scarring prevention purposes.

Through detailed evaluation and comprehensive strategy approaches tailored according to individual circumstances, our goal at Carlson Bier is ensuring maximum compensation against severe disruptions caused by dog bite accidents. We aim to recover costs associated not only with immediate medical expenses but also long-term effects such as emotional trauma or loss of income due potential disability implication arising from severity inflicted damages sustained during these horrifying incidents.

We want you to know that you’re not alone in this. Our dedicated team will fight for you throughout the process, offering expert advice catered to your specific circumstances and ensuring that all legal guidelines are adhered to effectively – making sure nothing is left to chance. While we understand no amount of financial compensation can erase the pain endured, it helps alleviate some burdens associated with such traumatic incidents.

Carlson Bier – your trusted personal injury lawyer – sincerely believes in putting clients at the center of their legal endeavor, fostering an environment of trust and confidence. We navigate these rough waters keeping your best interests at heart while delivering justice you rightly deserve.

By transforming our extensive experience into valuable insights for our clientele’s benefit, we’ve established ourselves as a premier law firm adeptly navigating complex dog bite laws’ landscape in Illinois. Every single case receives undivided attention from dedicated professionals determined not just about winning but also delivering value beyond monetary reward – helping victims reclaim their lives post-traumatic events marred by such unfortunate incidents.

Through empathetic engagement coupled with aggressive pursuit centered on securing deserved justice allows us carving a niche as preferred choice among those seeking professional counsel following bitter experiences permeated by dog bites or attacks.

Evaluating precise worth of each claim forms integral part our service offer; hence, we thoroughly analyze every aspect related to incident prior determining potential payout value based upon diverse factors – ranging from severity inflicted injuries up unto long-term implications thereupon affecting victim’s quality life.

Ready to take control back? Click below and start discovering what your dog bite injury claim could be worth today! Act now – transform this challenging phase into opportunities poised for repairing shattered dreams while restoring disrupted normalcy amidst tormented turmoil through Carlson Bier’s unmatched expertise safeguarding irreplaceable ids within perilous mazes constituted under Illinois Dog Bite Law.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Carlyle Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Carlyle

Areas of Practice in Carlyle

Cycling Collisions

Dedicated to legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Providing expert legal help for people of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Physician Incompetence

Providing specialist legal support for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Responsibility

Handling cases involving dangerous products, offering skilled legal services to victims affected by defective items.

Geriatric Neglect

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Stumble Injuries

Skilled in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking compensation for their damages.

Newborn Harms

Providing legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Mishaps: Dedicated to guiding victims of car accidents receive appropriate settlement for wounds and destruction.

Motorcycle Accidents

Dedicated to providing representation for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

18-Wheeler Incident

Delivering experienced legal services for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for hurts.

Building Collisions

Focused on supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Cerebral Impairments

Specializing in extending compassionate legal services for clients suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Injuries

Adept at tackling cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Accidents

Expert in legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Passing

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and adept legal support to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Dedicated to supporting patients with paralysis, offering professional legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer