Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Carpentersville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to navigating the complexities of spinal cord injuries, you need experienced and skilled representation – that’s where Carlson Bier steps in. Our team excels in handling these intricate cases with unwavering diligence and deep understanding. Trust us for our unsurpassed knowledge about Illinois legalities surrounding Spinal Cord Injuries litigation. With a staunch commitment to every client’s justice, we invest substantial time researching up-to-date legislation pertinent to each case. Striving fiercely for fitting outcomes aligns exactly with what those suffering from spinal cord injuries deserve: relief and fairness above all else.

Having established ourselves as formidable litigators across Illinois, residents of Carpentersville can absolutely avail themselves of our specialized services without hesitation or doubt. We’re well-versed experts dedicated to ensuring possible compensation is maximized as per state guidelines.

Holding negligent parties responsible while safeguarding injured victims’ rights forms the bedrock of Carlson Bier’s mission statement. When your life is dramatically altered due to an unfortunate incident causing significant spine damage, remember – Voice yours through Carlson Bier; your reliable advocates championing Spinal Cord Injuries resolution with absolute tenacity.

We are not just lawyers—we’re guardians fighting relentlessly for justice on behalf of spinal cord injury patients amidst trying times; opt for none but Carlton Bier when seeking comprehensive legal support centered around results—no shortcuts,total empathy,and unequivocal skill!

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Carpentersville Illinois

Spinal cord injuries can often result in severe, life-altering consequences. That’s where the team at Carlson Bier comes into the picture, offering relentless advocacy for personal injury victims across Illinois. Our dedicated crew of seasoned personal injury attorneys stand committed to support every client who suffers a spinal cord mishap by ensuring they receive fair compensation for their injuries.

To understand spinal cord injuries better: they primarily occur when there’s damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves that connection ends to this critical body system. The aftermath includes permanent alterations in the strength, sensation and other bodily functions below the level of injury.

Here are key aspects to note about these types of injuries:

• Severity: Spinal Cord Injuries are classified as either complete or incomplete. A complete injury means there is no functioning below the level of injury; whereas an incomplete injury implies there is some functioning below the primary level.

• Consequences: The ramifications mostly depend upon severity and location – these range from numbness or loss of motor function to paralysis.

• Causes: Typically caused due to a violent blow-traffic collisions being most common, followed by falls, sports accidents and acts of violence.

Factors such as swift emergency medical attention followed by ongoing treatment play crucial roles in determining long-term outcomes for people with spinal cord injuries. Medical bills can pile up quickly-and we at Carson Bier understand how overwhelming it can be, which is why our mission is firmly grounded on helping clients secure suitable reimbursements for their losses including loss of future earnings capacity, emotional anguish, costs associated with home modifications and much more.

In our vast experience championing personal injury cases in Illinois, we have found one irrefutable truth-spinal cord injuries demand comprehensive litigation approaches since these claims involve complicated medical jargon and require assessments from multiple experts including health care providers and accident reconstruction analysts to corroborate facts accurately. All strategies curated take several critical factors into account-extent and nature of the injury, economic losses incurred and future medical needs.

At Carson Bier, we understand that every individual’s circumstances are unique. Our attorneys delve deeper into your case to develop an action plan tailored to your specific needs. With us by your side, you will never fight alone-we tirelessly strive to ensure that justice is delivered to those who deserve it.

We encourage you not just take our word for it. It’s crucial that you feel confident and comfortable in your choice of legal representation. Therefore, we extend an invitation for a free consultation with one of our skilled personal injury attorneys so you can determine first-hand why Carlson Bier can be the right choice for handling your spinal cord injury claim.

Navigating through any personal injury lawsuit can often be daunting-not anymore when you have the expertise of Carson Bier at your disposal. Our organized approach coupled with profound experience in Illinois’ legal landscape ensures a seamless journey throughout this complex process-where informed decisions are made with clarity and backed by knowledge.

Whether the spinal cord injury was due to blatant negligence on another party or from sheer unexpected accidents, know this-you don’t have to bear the burden alone. A dedicated team stands ready to help-right here at Carlson Bier, ensuring that every case receives due diligence while considerations about compensations each client rightfully deserves is paramount in all preparations – because we believe fair compensation does more than cover costs; it paves way towards recovery.

Ready to step forward on this path? Click on the button below now to find out precisely how much YOUR CASE IS WORTH-and turn towards starting a new chapter with hope and strength!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Carpentersville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Carpentersville

Areas of Practice in Carpentersville

Cycling Incidents

Proficient in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Supplying expert legal assistance for victims of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Clinical Malpractice

Delivering professional legal assistance for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Responsibility

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, delivering specialist legal guidance to clients affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Stumble Incidents

Skilled in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking recovery for their suffering.

Infant Wounds

Offering legal aid for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Accidents: Focused on supporting clients of car accidents gain equitable compensation for injuries and damages.

Scooter Collisions

Expert in providing legal support for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Trucking Collision

Ensuring adept legal assistance for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for losses.

Construction Site Mishaps

Dedicated to supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cerebral Damages

Dedicated to offering dedicated legal advice for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Injuries

Specialized in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Dedicated to legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unfair Loss

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and skilled legal support to ensure justice.

Vertebral Harm

Expert in assisting persons with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer