...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Carthage

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering a dog bite injury can be an incredibly distressing experience, leaving victims physically and emotionally scarred. In these circumstances, you require expert legal representation to pursue the justice and recompense you deserve; that’s where Carlson Bier steps in. Renowned across Illinois for their unparalleled skills and dedication in personal injury law, Carlson Bier specializes in representing clients with dog bite injuries. Their proficient team meticulously scrutinizes every case detail ensuring comprehensive claim execution. Recoverable damages might include medical expenses, lost wages due to recovery time away from work, pain and suffering, emotional trauma among others crucial considerations pertinent to your unique situation. Managing such complexities alone could significantly weaken one’s claim integrity leading to sub-optimal outcomes – but not on our watch! Motivated by compassion and the pursuit of justice, Carlson Bier relentlessly safeguards your rights against powerful insurance companies aiming at minimizing payout obligations post-injury incidents like thos involving unruly dogs . This makes us the undeniably preferred choice for representing those affected by canine-inflicted harm seeking deserved compensation within Illinois’ boundaries—your fight becomes ours.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Carthage Illinois

At the distinguished law firm of Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury cases, including those related to dog bite injuries. Based in Illinois, our dedicated team of professionals has an impressive track record for holding dog owners accountable and securing just compensation on behalf of victims.

Dog bite injuries can have serious immediate and long-term consequences that extend far beyond the initial wound itself. These incidents can lead to severe physical injury, emotional trauma, risk of infection as well as unforeseen medical costs. For this reason, you need a skilled legal advocate who is unflinchingly committed to asserting your rights and defending your interests in these complex matters.

• Immediate Medical Care: This initial aftermath often includes emergency medical treatment such as stitches or even surgery in extreme cases.

• Ongoing Medical Costs: Dog bites carry potential for infection that could necessitate additional medical expenses

• Psychological Counseling: Victims, particularly children may require therapy to overcome post-trauma anxiety towards dogs.

• Loss Of Income: If you are unable to work due to a Dog Bite Injury, lost wages can add significant financial stress

• Disfigurement & Scarring : Deep wounds may leave permanent scars causing both psychological and physical pain

In Indiana State Law Section 3-14-3-18/19 (Dangerous Dogs), clearly states that dog owners are held responsible if their pet causes harm provided that the victim was not provoking it at the time nor trespassing on private property. A deeper understanding here relates why focusing on prevention remains paramount. Owners are advised to train their dogs appropriately from infancy; fixating on pet behavior ensures mitigated risks overall.

Here at Carlson Bier where empathetic support meets unmatched legal expertise– guidance navigates with ease through daunting task of recovering damages for unexpected dog bite injuries incurred through no fault of your own. When you become our client , rest assured knowing each intricate detail surrounding incident will be investigated thoroughly leading optimized winning strategies.

Exemplifying cutting edge, our comprehensive approach ensures securing maximum compensation feasible for your physical pain and suffering, mental anguish as well as any other hardship you had to endure. No stone is left unturned in fighting for what is due on your behalf.

Carlson Bier’s multipronged strategy embarks with a complimentary consultation designed specifically around each distinctive case need. Drafting an indisputable narrative once evaluating the entire dog bite scenario aids delivering effective & compelling case arguments.

Choosing Carlson Bier implies engaging passionate legal expertise determined on safeguarding victim rights ending leaving no scope unheard or uncompensated. Experience how we remain committed to view your fight as ours ensuring yield successful outcomes in personal injury lawsuits.

Your journey towards obtaining rightful justice starts from first interaction itself; careful assessment easily pave way for deciding future course of action correspondent to individual needs. Our dedicated team promises beside standing at every step during this often overwhelming process letting embarking clients focus solely on recuperation without worrying about medical charges.

Remember, acquiring proper legal representation significantly impacts overall outcome dealt with comparative negligence instances or if dogs hold certain dangerous breed status effectuating argument directed against inherent nature of beast has its own demanding aspect where professional attorney intervention proves indispensable.

Click on the button below to garner bespoke advice enabling comprehensive view of potential directions your legal recourse may adapt optimally thus directly influencing projected monetary value associated with proceeding lawsuit-your assured right following distressing instance laden with emotional as well as financial burden alike. Trust the Carlson Bier law firm to relentlessly advocate for you while relieving you from anxiety-laden hassles piling extraordinary medical bills plus psychological trauma.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Carthage Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Carthage

Areas of Practice in Carthage

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Specializing in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Giving specialist legal services for victims of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Physician Negligence

Delivering specialist legal services for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Liability

Handling cases involving defective products, extending expert legal guidance to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Malpractice

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Fall Mishaps

Specialist in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking redress for their harm.

Newborn Injuries

Providing legal help for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Accidents: Dedicated to helping clients of car accidents receive reasonable payout for harms and harm.

Motorcycle Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal services for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

18-Wheeler Incident

Offering expert legal assistance for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for hurts.

Building Mishaps

Committed to defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Brain Traumas

Dedicated to delivering dedicated legal advice for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Injuries

Specialized in managing cases for clients who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Collisions

Committed to legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Loss

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and experienced legal services to ensure redress.

Neural Harm

Dedicated to advocating for clients with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer