...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Carthage

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When the unthinkable happens and you become a victim of medical malpractice, Carlson Bier is the trusted source to seek knowledgeable legal aid. Serving clients like yourself in Carthage, we specialize in representing cases that require extreme diligence and expertise. Our experienced team vigorously fights for justice on behalf of those wronged by healthcare professionals’ negligence. As experts in Illinois tort law, we understand how devastating these situations can be both emotionally and financially. We will tirelessly work to ensure you receive adequate compensation for your hardships faced due to medical malpractice; everything from ongoing treatment costs or lost income to pain and suffering endured as a result of such unfortunate circumstances. The success rate at Carlson Bier defending Medical Malpractice claims truly sets us apart – living testament to our skilled approach towards each case combined with an unwavering commitment towards upholding client interests foremostly. When facing harrowing times because of ill-advised medical practices- remember Carlson Bier: defining excellence through better representation one case at a time.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Carthage Illinois

At Carlson Bier, your wellbeing matters to us. As a renowned Illinois-based personal injury law firm, we specialize in protecting the rights of medical malpractice victims. With years of experience, our team is not only equipped with unrivaled expertise but also steadfast devotion to obtaining justice for individuals who have suffered due to medical negligence.

Medical malpractice is an unfortunate yet prevalent reality that results in substantial harm to many unsuspecting patients. This refers to situations where healthcare providers diverge from standard practices and procedures, leading to preventable injuries or health complications. These breaches often stem from errors in diagnosis, treatment, aftercare, or health management.

• Misdiagnosis: When healthcare professionals fail to identify a patient’s condition accurately and promptly.

• Surgical Errors: Instances of erroneous surgical procedures that lead directly to an injury.

• Medication Mistakes: Pharmaceutical errors involving administering incorrect medication doses or wrong medications altogether.

• Negligence during childbirth: Failures by healthcare professionals before or during birth can result in significant injuries like cerebral palsy or Erb’s palsy

Delving deeper into the specific nuances of these categories could help you discern if you’ve been subjected to any such predicaments. However, proving medical malpractices demands keen insight into intricate legal facets coupled with robust evidence gathering skills.

Typically an adept attorney seeks out certain elements critical while making a claim:

– The presence of a duty owed by the health care provider initially

– A breach of the standard care expected

– An injury caused as a direct consequence

– Damages resulting from this injury

Armed with this knowledge and exceptional litigation prowess at Carlson Bier are vigilant about holding negligent practitioners accountable for their actions. Our attorneys diligently review all aspects of your case — from critiquing the initial examination reports down scrutinizing pharmacy chains — amassing all proofs necessary for securing compensations fitting for your situation.

At our esteemed firm we understand that dealing with any form of personal injury, let alone medical malpractice, can be emotionally taxing and financially debilitating. On top of the physical agony, it ushers in piling recovery bills further burdening you and your loved ones. That’s why our compassionate lawyers devout extensive hours meticulously preparing cases for trial to recover possible damages inclusive of:

– Medical expenses past and future

– Lost wages

– Emotional distress

– Any other losses directly related

Moreover, under specific circumstances known as ‘punitive damages’, an extra amount might be added by the court designed to punish the wrongdoer.

What sets us apart at Carlson Bier is that we believe informed clients are empowered clients. Hence through our consistent commitment to imparting legal education and upholding transparency, we strive diligently to guide you every step of the way. You’re never alone when you partner with us; we become your strongest advocates standing firm by your side during these strenuous times.

Even though victories cannot undo the harm caused nor eliminate future uncertainties entirely, they do bring forth financial relief assisting victims on their journey towards healing. Furthermore, successful lawsuits can also draw public attention towards systemic healthcare inadequacies contributing significantly to enhancing overall patient care standards.

We invite you now to take action. It’s time for accountability and justice — no longer should victims bear the brunt in silence. If you or a loved one has been affected due to medical negligence don’t hesitate make use of our readily accessible resources or consult attorneys well versed with Illinois’ complex laws surrounding this challenging arena.

Take a moment right now – click on the button below for a tailored assessment of your case devised by some of Illinois’ most respected personal injury litigators here at Carlson Bier— discovering how much it could be worth pursuing justice with conviction and trained expertise on your side.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Carthage Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Carthage

Areas of Practice in Carthage

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Proficient in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or risky conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Supplying professional legal services for people of major burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Medical Misconduct

Offering professional legal assistance for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Responsibility

Addressing cases involving defective products, providing adept legal help to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Neglect

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Slip Mishaps

Skilled in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking compensation for their injuries.

Birth Wounds

Providing legal assistance for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Accidents: Concentrated on supporting clients of car accidents receive fair compensation for harms and impairment.

Motorcycle Crashes

Committed to providing representation for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Trucking Incident

Ensuring professional legal representation for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for damages.

Construction Incidents

Dedicated to representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Brain Damages

Committed to ensuring professional legal support for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Specialized in handling cases for people who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Passing

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and experienced legal support to ensure redress.

Vertebral Injury

Dedicated to assisting clients with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​